Syrian army general assassinated in Damascus
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 2 )
( 1 )
( 6 )
( 10 )
( 7 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
5 Comments
Login to comment
0
NeverSubmit
The people fighting the Syrian government seem to be terrorists.
If an armed group of people were acting the same way in a Western country as the rebels are in Syria we would call them terrorists.
3
m5c32
That's obvious. I'm surprised you seem unaware that the adjective and noun "terrorist" is relative. That's not to say that such labeling is unjustified. Usually the more powerful entity gets to do the labeling; yet, sometimes it's the ruling power which is doing the terrorising which results in guerrilla warfare which then gets labeled with terrorism because, they in fact are also engaging in terrorism. Simply put, both sides of a conflict may engage in terroristic activities to some end. Who is "right" is sometimes tough to say and one may have to wait some time to see who the more "just" people are. Power struggles are seldom clean. Most often they are very messy with degrees of good and bad.
-1
Triumvere
Funny. I was thinking it was the Syrian Gov't acting like terrorists.
0
Triumvere
0
edojin
Syria ... a coup d'etat is in progress. It is only natural for the ruling government to do what it can to retain power. So blood will flow freely until one side or the other prevails. That, in short, is what happens in a coup d'etat.
Back to top