world

Tensions high as more protests planned in Missouri

36 Comments
By JIM SALTER

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

36 Comments
Login to comment

This is not a black/white issue. It is a good/bad issue.

Thugs have such disrespect for authority and thats an indicator a thug is 'on the edge' of the law. When will thugs of all races learn your behavior is a clear indication of being on the fringe of the law or worse.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Online court documents show that Myers was free on bond when he was killed. He had been charged with the unlawful use of a weapon, a felony, and misdemeanor resisting arrest in June.

Being 18yrs old he should be in school now. Seems to me his 3 month rampage started when school got out (June) and lasted the whole summer.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

This is not a black/white issue. It is a good/bad issue.

Thugs have such disrespect for authority and thats an indicator a thug is 'on the edge' of the law. When will thugs of all races learn your behavior is a clear indication of being on the fringe of the law or worse.

No, doubt. I am so sick and tired of the race baiters trying to politicize the issue, there was last month a cop that was shot by thugs and NO one marched or protested on Sept. 28th. Did I hear any of the usual suspects on JT cry out, NOPE! He's ok, but the point is, NO outrage. Hypocrites!

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

@bass4funk, if you are referring to an incident a while ago in Ferguson, why has the official story about the near-shooting already changed? If you check the STL Post Dispatch, it went from plural suspects to only one. Next, will it turn out to have been an embarrassing accident? How about a rally to encourage officers to get better training for handling firearms.

Rand Paul just spoke to the NAACP in Ferguson. Do you include him among those who want to politicize the issue?

3 ( +3 / -0 )

FYI TorafusuTorasan. Weekly across the nation Black on White crimes are committed daily, some fatal. No protests, no race card outcries, no media attention. Most of all no US Attorney General attention either.

Street thugs are scum, they need education, motivation and self respect. Unfortunately entitlement lifestyle does not bolster self respect. That is evident in all races. Entitlement lifestyles need to go. Entitlement boosts in life when in need is fine with me. I just oppose cradle to grave entitlements for being lazy.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

there was last month a cop that was shot by thugs and NO one marched or protested on Sept. 28th. Did I hear any of the usual suspects on JT cry out, NOPE! He's ok, but the point is, NO outrage. Hypocrites!

Not really the same thing is it though. Of course, no one other than hard-core criminals think it's ok to shoot at the police. But the fact is, if you are a police officer, you have chosen a profession that comes with a high potential for getting shot at. This is different from the kid who is walking down the road living his life, and gets shot by a cop with an attitude. The cops are supposed to serve, but when a cop shoots an unarmed person, they are only serving their own interests, not the people.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

BTW Stranger, last I heard an investigation was ongoing. That means the facts and allegations are being investigated. The scenario you post are allegations.

Police are to Serve and 'Protect'. You missed that point also. Quite possible the officer was 'Protecting'. Wait for the investigation report for the facts. Otherwise your allegations are meaningless.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

The kid was unarmed, and there have been no disputes on that fact. No need for an investigation into those facts, they have been acknowledged by both sides.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Reports say a struggle for the officers gun......self preservation from a thug in his eyes if true.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

protests are just an excuse to attack and loot shops and get free stuff.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

The kid was unarmed, and there have been no disputes on that fact. No need for an investigation into those facts, they have been acknowledged by both sides.

I agree with everyone else, you weren't there, none of us were. We don't have all the facts. Let the investigation run it's course. The only thing I'm worried about if the Grand Jury doesn't find any evidence that Wilson was wrong and he was justified in the shooting, people like you won't be satisfied with anything other than a guilty verdict. The Feds and the Grand Jury took their time and in the event that they find Officer Wilson was not responsible for Brown's death, Brown was himself, will you guys let it go? They didn't rush the investigation, they interviewed all the witnesses, went over the crime scene extensively and nothing, if that's the case, you guys need to let go and applaud the justice system for giving the officer a fair hearing. And as -"umbrella" said, most of the protests are merely an excuse to go out and loot.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

Reports say a struggle for the officers gun......

There hasn't been one report claiming a struggle for the officer's gun. DNA and fingerprint testing has been done on the weapon and the results have come back. Here's how the public can surmise that there wasn't a trace of evidence on the weapon of Brown's DNA: On September 17, Darren Wilson testified before the grand jury for over four hours.

We're talking about an incident that didn't even take three minutes before an unarmed jaywalker was lying dead in the street, and Wilson is up there for over four hours. If Brown's prints or DNA were on that weapon, Wilson's testimony wouldn't have taken more than 15-20 minutes. It's only because there wasn't a trace of Brown on that weapon that Wilson had to recount a three-minute story over and over and over again for over four hours.

Next is the fact that the Ferguson police lied when their chief gave out the distance of Brown's body from Wilson's vehicle as "35 feet." The eyewitnesses said the distance was much greater, clearly indicating flight, not fight. Like a sucker, I tended to believe the police account over the eyewitnesses. As it turns out, forensic examiners have gone over the scene and know the precise locations of Wilson's vehicle and Brown's body. The actual distance of his body from Wilson's vehicle was approximately 100 feet. The eyewitnesses had it right. Why the police tried to float such an obvious lie seems very odd.

The video evidence shows one of Brown's flip-flop sandals about 20-30 feet from the vehicle -- which came off as he was running his tail off to get away from the vehicle. Wilson has no claim whatsoever of self-defense based on this evidence. He's a murderer every bit as much as the killer of Jordan Davis.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

I agree with everyone else, you weren't there, none of us were. We don't have all the facts.

No, but we do have one of the facts - the kid was not armed. That's not in dispute anywhere by anyone.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Unarmed, yes. A threat to the officers life if aggressive, yes. Justifiable in that case, yes. Otherwise Wilson is in trouble. Innocent until proven guilty is the law in this land.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

yabits: ... Here's how the public can surmise that there wasn't a trace of evidence on the weapon of Brown's DNA: On September 17, Darren Wilson testified before the grand jury for over four hours. ... We're talking about an incident that didn't even take three minutes before an unarmed jaywalker was lying dead in the street, and Wilson is up there for over four hours. If Brown's prints or DNA were on that weapon, Wilson's testimony wouldn't have taken more than 15-20 minutes. ...

That's a big stretch.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

That's a big stretch.

Knowing that Wilson testified for over four hours, please state the odds -- as you see them -- that there was physical evidence from Brown on that weapon or holster.

I say the odds at this point are less than 1%. Here's your chance to provide a number which will show us how much you know about stretches.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Let's try guessing at your scenario for the grand jury requiring no more than 15-20 minutes because Brown's DNA is found on the gun.

Something out of Monty Python?

Wilson's attorney: "And in addition Brown's DNA was found on the gun."

Grand jury foreman: "WELL, no more need be said, Mr. Wilson! Sorry to take up so much of your time! I knew your father well, we played golf often back in the day. How about lunch next Wednesday?"

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Let's try guessing at your scenario for the grand jury requiring no more than 15-20 minutes because Brown's DNA is found on the gun.

If Brown's DNA is on the gun OR holster, it's all the evidence Wilson needs to demonstrate Brown was making an attempt for his weapon -- a move which would warrant the use of deadly force.

I'll ask again: Based on 4+ hours required for testimony -- on a 3-minute event -- what are the odds that you claim that Brown's evidence is on the gun or holster? That's what this really comes down to -- and not your attempt at comedy.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

yabits : what are the odds that you claim that Brown's evidence is on the gun or holster?

I claim there is almost no connection between the two quantities "time Wilson retained for testimony" and "whether Brown's DNA was on the gun", so how are you going to get odds from it?

You're claiming Brown's DNA on the gun would give the defense a slam dunk, and grand jury would feel no reason to question Wilson much. That's just "out there".

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I'll ask again: Based on 4+ hours required for testimony -- on a 3-minute event -- what are the odds that you claim that Brown's evidence is on the gun or holster? That's what this really comes down to -- and not your attempt at comedy.

I'll ask this question as painlessly as I can once again, Yabits. And I'll ask it in the most simplest ways so that you don't misunderstand me. If Wilson is not charged, it would mean, the Feds and the Grand Jury couldn't find or there wasn't enough circumstantial evidence to convict Wilson, if that's the case, will you move on? Because the justice system played itself out and that's that. You can come on here trying to explain again and again your theories and what you've read witnesses said this or that and honestly I don't know why to jam in possible scenarios that could've happened, but were not proven. In any case, it matters not what you think, it matters what the Feds and Grand Jury could find or prove and if they can't find anything that shows that Wilson intentionally murdered Brown, then that's it, case closed. Or, if they do find the evidence that he did maliciously and with intent killed Brown, then he should be arrested and face the maximum sentence.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

You're claiming Brown's DNA on the gun would give the defense a slam dunk, and grand jury would feel no reason to question Wilson much. That's just "out there".

If Brown's DNA was on the gun, not only would Wilson's testimony have been significantly shorter, the grand jury would have reached a decision not to indict by now.

I claim there is almost no connection between the two quantities

So you're not able to think that there's any correlation. Four hours of testimony on the three-minute even means nothing to you, and that a key variable like physical evidence on the holster and/or gun means nothing to you. That's fine.

If Wilson is not charged, it would mean, the Feds and the Grand Jury couldn't find or there wasn't enough circumstantial evidence to convict Wilson, if that's the case, will you move on?

Your question demonstrates your ignorance of this **specific" procedure -- and the role the DA decided to take in it. It's doubly ignorant because the "Feds" are not investigating Wilson.

Brown's body was 100 feet from Wilson's vehicle. That much is proven. That's an awfully long distance. Not the 35 feet that the police lied about -- making it appear that a shadow of doubt could be cast on whether Brown was trying to distance himself from the officer. Oh, that the police claimed it was 35 feet is also proven.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

If Brown's DNA was on the gun, not only would Wilson's testimony have been significantly shorter, the grand jury would have reached a decision not to indict by now.

If, but what happens IF the forensics doesn't support that theory, which is what it is? The grand jury didn't reach a verdict, which means, it's NOT a solid shut case.

So you're not able to think that there's any correlation.

I'm not on the investigation team, I'll let them sort it out, they get paid for doing that. I don't get paid privately or by JT to make probable guesses.

Four hours of testimony on the three-minute even means nothing to you, and that a key variable like physical evidence on the holster and/or gun means nothing to you. That's fine.

It doesn't matter what I think, I'm not, you're not on the case. Trust me when I tell you, your life as well as mine will go on. I ONLY care about Wilson getting a fair trial and if he is NOT found guilty of any wrongdoing, the lynch mobs should disperse, everyone go home and let everything turn back to normal, the justice system has spoken, next! That's all I care about. Brown is dead, can't change that fact. Charges and allegations were brought and filed and if the investigation shows Wilson is innocent, let it go. You will be fine, so will everyone else.

Your question demonstrates your ignorance of this **specific" procedure -- and the role the DA decided to take in it. It's doubly ignorant because the "Feds" are not investigating Wilson.

I think more, that the people that have an axe to grind and will stop at nothing whether there is evidence or not or if Wilson is proven to be innocent, the mobs won't be satisfied until there is vigilante justice. in other words, if the verdict doesn't go the way the people in Ferguson want, it's called injustice. So in order to show their disapproval, they have to engage in acts of rioting and looting? Now that's being ignorant.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

The grand jury didn't reach a verdict, which means, it's NOT a solid shut case.

The only decision the grand jury has to reach is whether or not the evidence warrants an indictment. You ignorantly keep portraying this as a "trial." There is absolutely no one representing Brown -- the real victim -- in this procedure.

I'm not on the investigation team, I'll let them sort it out, they get paid for doing that. I don't get paid privately or by JT to make probable guesses.

If someone is paying you to think, they must have overdrawn their account long ago. To the people assembling in the St. Louis area, it is not Darren Wilson who is on trial but the justice system itself. For the intelligent people out there: District attorneys are extremely reluctant to bring charges against police officers who make the appearance of acting in the line of duty. That fact alone tilts the scales against justice being granted to an unarmed 18-year-old jaywalker wearing flip-flop sandals.

in other words, if the verdict doesn't go the way the people in Ferguson want, it's called injustice.

Wrong, and grossly stupid. The grand jury has to reveal the details of the process by which they arrived at their decision. If they decided to give Wilson the benefit of a doubt despite the evidence, it most certainly would be an injustice.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

It's the "normal" which has created so many of the problems between the Ferguson police dept and the black community. It has made many violations and are still being investigated. Telling protestors that they had to keep walking was a violation of the constitution.

Exactly and if the police feel that there is a chance that a riot could possibly happen they also have a responsibility to the community in keeping them and the property of the store owners public and private safe, that is their first and foremost duty. No one is stepping on the rights of the protesters, they don't have a right to protest anytime they want, whenever they want, of course not. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can yell fire in a crowded room.

Since the killing of Brown there have been no changes in the community or how the cops operate within it.

Maybe because the problem doesn't lay with the cops.

The reported stories remain the same and never change. Change takes time but ther appears to be no attempt to even make a start, which should begin with the replacement of the police chief.

That depends on who you are asking, but the voter turnout for Blacks in that city is very low, if every person would vote, the Blacks could get the person they want in office, but the Whites in Ferguson overwhelmingly vote more than the Blacks. So if you want to institute change, that's where you start. Blacks should get the vote out.

@yabits

The only decision the grand jury has to reach is whether or not the evidence warrants an indictment. You ignorantly keep portraying this as a "trial." There is absolutely no one representing Brown -- the real victim -- in this procedure.

No! The trial meaning "officer Wilson" is in trial in the eye of the public in Ferguson. But what if there is NO indictment, will you finally give all of us a rest and let this go? It would mean there was NO evidence to support that officer Wilson exceeded his authority and probably was justified in using reasonable force for a thug that tried to take him down. Or will you come on JT and complain the justice system doesn't work because the indictment didn't go the way YOU wanted it to go?

If someone is paying you to think, they must have overdrawn their account long ago. To the people assembling in the St. Louis area, it is not Darren Wilson who is on trial but the justice system itself.

Only to the protesters.

For the intelligent people out there:

Intelligent people know to allow the justice system to play itself out and whatever the verdict, accept it and move on.

District attorneys are extremely reluctant to bring charges against police officers who make the appearance of acting in the line of duty. That fact alone tilts the scales against justice being granted to an unarmed 18-year-old jaywalker wearing flip-flop sandals.

Ok, so now we are back to digging again?

Wrong, and grossly stupid. The grand jury has to reveal the details of the process by which they arrived at their decision. If they decided to give Wilson the benefit of a doubt despite the evidence, it most certainly would be an injustice.

That would be your opinion. In other words that would mean, if the verdict doesn't go the way I want, then there will be repercussions. Sounds like a threat and that's the reason the police are making sure to neutralize that threat if people decide to that the opportunity AGAIN to riot and loot. Which would happen and nothing to do with justice. Anyone that is White in that neighborhood would be foolish to drive around Ferguson. I was in the middle of the L.A. riots reporting reporting and that was one of the scariest job I have ever done, for 4 days it looked like Armageddon. I remember when the Blacks were dragging people out of their cars pummeling them, kicking and beating them and who could forget Reginald Denny, the innocent truck driver trying to get through along Florence and Normandy Blvd. They pulled the man out of his truck and beat him until his skull caved in and for what? Because the Rodney King verdict didn't go their way??? No one wants to go through that and shouldn't. It took months to clean the city and the cops are not and should not allow that kind of anarchy to happen again.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

As I said, Wilson is in trial in the court of the Ferguson public. So in theory if the down breaks down with riots will depend if the public accept the verdict of Officer Wilson or not.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

The Grand Jury will not end until January so we didn't know what it has decided but its not a trial.

While the term of this grand jury will end in January, the district attorney has estimated they will be done with their work in this case by early November.

Thus far, political cowardice has reigned supreme in the case, which has only inflamed passions even more. The DA has the power to file charges in the case without a grand jury, but has refused to do so. (He comes from a police family, and his father was killed by a criminal in the line of duty.) The governor of the state has the power to replace the prosecutor with a special prosecutor but has refused to do so, fearing the political repercussions.

As one attorney in St. Louis County puts it: "Bob McCulloch is a very experienced prosecutor, and he knows how to manipulate the system so that when it’s done, it will appear the grand jury did the ‘no true bill’ and that it was their decision." This strategy has provoked criticism as a disaster waiting to happen. Former federal prosecutor Alex Little says that this decision to present all of the evidence, and to use up such a long period of time, indicates that McCulloch is using the grand jury as a “delaying tactic.”

It’s hard to think of anything more cynical. The prosecutor has almost complete discretion as to what evidence the grand jury hears. There is no obligation to present defenses or alternative theories of the case, and because the grand jury is not an adversarial proceeding, there is no cross-examination of witnesses. Officer Darren Wilson can walk into the grand jury room, tell his tale, and no trained opposing force will be challenging his story.

The people on the street know that the system is being manipulated in every possible way so as to achieve the result that this murderer pretending to be police will never have to face a trial. If the grand jury does recommend charges, it means it has passed some very serious hurdles operating in Wilson's favor.

will depend if the public accept

Based upon the extremely cynical process described by legal experts in Missouri, why would any member of the public accept it?

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Thus far, political cowardice has reigned supreme in the case, which has only inflamed passions even more.

Because the justice system could possibly NOT go the way most Blacks in ferguson want? Instead of letting the chips fall where they may and allow the Feds and Grand Jury do their job without prejudice. What more do you want? Race baiter Holder went down to Ferguson to appoint a special investigative task force to oversee the shooting and you libs still complain?? Basically, either Wilson gets prison time or else....

The DA has the power to file charges in the case without a grand jury, but has refused to do so. (He comes from a police family, and his father was killed by a criminal in the line of duty.)

A Black man

The governor of the state has the power to replace the prosecutor with a special prosecutor but has refused to do so, fearing the political repercussions.

Or because there wasn't enough evidence to charge Wilson.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Because the justice system could possibly NOT go the way most Blacks in ferguson want?

There are millions of Americans of all colors who know the system is cooked. We've got state and federal legal officials going public telling us that the system is cooked.

Instead of letting the chips fall where they may and allow the Feds and Grand Jury do their job without prejudice.

There's no proof that the grand jury is doing their job without prejudice, and I take such things on blind faith -- knowing that the very system has been cooked and manipulated by the DA from the beginning.

Basically, either Wilson gets prison time or else....

Yet again, this is woeful, stupid ignorance. Wilson should be charged and receive a trial. Period. The trial will determine if he receives prison time or not.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

"and I take such things on blind faith"

Correction: " and I refuse to take such things on blind faith.

Incorrect. In the Nov 2012 elections, 54% of Ferguson African Americans voted and 55% of Whites.

That's significant. Here in Georgia, reliable estimates show nearly 700,000 eligible voters who are African-American have not registered to vote. Even if 40% of those registered and showed up to vote, it would easily swing the governorship and two US Senate seats over to the Democrats. This is why conservatives have redoubled their efforts to suppress voter turnout among the poor and minorities.

This has relevance to this issue because there are still far too many enclaves like St. Louis County where many aspects of Jim Crow are still in effect.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

There are millions of Americans of all colors who know the system is cooked. We've got state and federal legal officials going public telling us that the system is cooked.

If Wilson is convicted you would say, the justice system worked, but he is NOT, there is a serious flaw with our system.

There's no proof that the grand jury is doing their job without prejudice, and I take such things on blind faith -- knowing that the very system has been cooked and manipulated by the DA from the beginning.

Hmmm, just a moth ago, you were on JT kissing the ground that Holder was walking on boasting, now is the time and things will get done, we'll get to the bottom of this and so positively sure that Wilson would be indicted NO MATTER what. Again, because the ruling could come the other way, now all of a sudden the system is corrupt?!

Yet again, this is woeful, stupid ignorance. Wilson should be charged and receive a trial. Period. The trial will determine if he receives prison time or not.

Well, that is your opinion, but again, you were for a grand jury coming in with the Feds and investigating the case. Now the possible cold feet that maybe Wilson was right all along. Even if he is found NOT to be liable for the death of a possible rampaging thug and the shooting was justified, will you shut it down and more importantly, will the people of Ferguson accept it and move on?

This has relevance to this issue because there are still far too many enclaves like St. Louis County where many aspects of Jim Crow are still in effect.

LOL, or the precisely put it, many Blacks just don't believe THEIR vote will make a difference and so many choose not to vote. Not the smartest thing to do. And then they get mad and cry racism when the answer is with them all along, get the vote out, but they don't. Has absolutely nothing to do with Jim Crow it has everything to do with pure political ignorance, the same way, the majority of Blacks constantly vote for a party that brings them nothing, nothing but promises of more entitlements and keeping them on the government dependency tit. But I keep forgetting, self-reliance and financial freedom is a racist thing!

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

If Wilson is convicted you would say, the justice system worked, but he is NOT, there is a serious flaw with our system.

You keep displaying your ignorance by talking about a "conviction." If the grand jury recommends charges, it means that there's a chance for justice despite the obvious flaws in the system.

Hmmm, just a moth ago, you were on JT kissing the ground that Holder was walking on boasting, now is the time and things will get done, we'll get to the bottom of this and so positively sure that Wilson would be indicted NO MATTER what.

I praise Holder because he understands the system is flawed. I never made any claim that Wilson was sure to be indicted. Holder has nothing to do with that process. But, as soon as this grand jury phase is over, all of the data should be turned over to the public for inspection to determine how they made their decision -- one way or the other.

Even if he is found NOT to be liable for the death of a possible rampaging thug

This makes the overt, premeditated, willful lie by the Ferguson police as to the distance that Brown's body was from the vehicle all the more significant. At 35 feet, there is some possibility, however small, of a "rampage" [sic]. At 100 feet there is no such possibility. The unarmed, shoe-less jaywalker is clearly in flight for his life. And Wilson is a murderer. The people of Ferguson can only move on if they countenance murder. That, apparently, is easy for white supremacists and haters to accept. For them, like Wilson, Brown's life had no value whatsoever.

For Wilson, Canfield Drive belonged to whites -- not the people who actually lived there -- which is why he felt he could be verbally and physically abusive -- as the eyewitnesses attest. (Wilson was known as abusive by others in the community. He was a thug, and the fact that nobody can produce any evidence of anything positive Wilson ever did for the people he was supposed to be serving speaks volumes.)

For the people of Ferguson, Brown's life did have value. There is no justifiable reason he should have been slaughtered after an altercation for jaywalking -- after trying to distance himself 100 feet from the officer's vehicle. This is impossible for white supremacists to understand or accept.

the majority of Blacks constantly vote for a party that brings them nothing

Even if the party brought nothing, it's better than a party which justifies murdering unarmed jaywalkers and seems all too wiling to visit the problems of inner city Chicago on any incident involving a black suspect anywhere in America.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

You keep displaying your ignorance by talking about a "conviction." If the grand jury recommends charges, it means that there's a chance for justice despite the obvious flaws in the system.

Or justice would be served if Wison is NOT indicted based on that the shooting was justified. Play with that possible scenario for a moment. If he is not indicted and found to be justified and vindicated, then that would mean, NOT only does the justice system work, but that it's NOT racially bias. That is something that you want, right?

I praise Holder because he understands the system is flawed. I never made any claim that Wilson was sure to be indicted.

Actually, NO. You have been constantly confident that an indictment is sure to be handed down, Yes, you didn't verbally say it, but along the lines of virtually every remark you made suggested it and now that there is a possibility that Wilson might NOT be indicted, now the system is flawed, it doesn't work and there is NO justice.

Holder has nothing to do with that process.

No, not directly perhaps, but he has a whole lot of influence and political pressure to back him.

But, as soon as this grand jury phase is over, all of the data should be turned over to the public for inspection to determine how they made their decision -- one way or the other.

I see. ROFL if Wilson is indicted, will you equally ask that all the data should be turned over for public inspection to determine how their decision was made?

And Wilson is a murderer.

You don't know that, you weren't there and you have absolutely Zero proof that he is a murderer or not or do you know more than the Feds?

The people of Ferguson can only move on if they countenance murder. That, apparently, is easy for white supremacists and haters to accept. For them, like Wilson, Brown's life had no value whatsoever.

So I was right. Whether Wilson is innocent or not, you guys want to lynch him, literally and convict him regardless of what the justice system says, so for the majority of Blacks and umber liberals the attitude is, get this guy or else, we will. I would call that reverse racism on a White person, not to mention on a cop. Who is now the racist?

He was a thug, and the fact that nobody can produce any evidence of anything positive Wilson ever did for the people he was supposed to be serving speaks volumes.)

Well, that could be. We now have two thugs, one White and one Black, I guess there is equality when it comes to thuggery.

For the people of Ferguson, Brown's life did have value. There is no justifiable reason he should have been slaughtered after an altercation for jaywalking -- after trying to distance himself 100 feet from the officer's vehicle. This is impossible for white supremacists to understand or accept.

There was NO justifiable reason for Brown to bum rush officer Wilson and for him to thug his way through a liquor store snagging cigars for blunts. Why is it, Liberal loons can't understand this? Also, before Brown was shot, no one knew who this kid was. Now all of a sudden, he's like a fairy Saint of the most highest. Give me a break.

Even if the party brought nothing, it's better than a party which justifies murdering unarmed jaywalkers and seems all too wiling to visit the problems of inner city Chicago on any incident involving a black suspect anywhere in America.

Blacks have no one else to blame but themselves, you get what you vote for. Second, the high crime rate between Black on Black is off the charts. Blacks are 20 times more likely to be killed by other Blacks than any other ethnic group. I don't see Sharpton or Malik Shabazz out there protesting and demanding Blacks to stop killing each other. Hmmm, I wonder why....

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites