Thursday February 16, 2012

Thai gov't to negotiate with airport protesters

BANGKOK —

Thailand’s government backed off Friday from its threat to forcibly remove protesters occupying Bangkok’s two airports in their campaign to oust the prime minister, saying police would avoid violence and attempt to negotiate.

Thousands of tourists have been left stranded since anti-government protesters occupied the main international Suvarnabhumi airport on Tuesday and the smaller Don Muang airport on Wednesday. Both airports are now shut down and the capital completely cut off to air traffic.

On Thursday, Prime Minister Somchai Wongsawat declared a state of emergency at the airports, authorizing police to take back the terminals. The order appeared to indicate that a crackdown was imminent against the members of the People’s Alliance for Democracy.

But eight hours later, government spokesman Nattawut Sai-Kau told The Associated Press that police have been instructed to get the protesters out of airports “as soon as possible” in a “peaceful manner.”

“Firstly, the police should open negotiation with the protester. If they refuse to go, police should do whatever is necessary to open the airports on the basis of nonviolence,” he said.

The new soft line, and the government’s failure to send in security forces so far, has raised doubts about whether Somchai has the support of security forces and the army, a powerful institution that has traditionally played a key role in the country’s politics.

Army commander Gen Anupong Paochinda has so far been neutral in the political turmoil, and even suggested that Somchai call new elections, triggering speculation that a military coup could take place.The whispers were further fueled by press reports Thursday of tank movements that the military later said were only a training exercise.

In an address to the nation Thursday night to announce the emergency, Somchai said that navy and air force personnel would help the police, but was vague about any participation by the army, saying only the government would also ask the army “to help take care of the people.”

The state of emergency also empowers the government to suspend some civil liberties, including restricting the movement of people and prohibiting mass assembly.

Emergency was declared once before in the three months since the protesters seized the prime minister’s office, but there was no move to take advantage of its provisions, apparently because the army was reluctant to take on the alliance, which at the time enjoyed greater popularity.

The protesters remained defiant on Friday.

“We are ready to defend ourselves against any government’s operations to get us out of those places,” Parnthep Wongpuapan, a spokesman of the People’s Alliance for Democracy, said.

“We are going to stay at the airports until Somchai resigns,” he said.

Protesters at the international airport donned goggles and helmets, and first aid stations handed out surgical masks in anticipation of a police raid. The group’s “guards” were patrolling the area with slingshots and metal batons. Many also carry concealed handguns.

Speakers from a makeshift stage repeatedly yelled: “Are you scared?” The crowd roared back: “We’re not scared!”

They alliance’s protest grew out of its hatred of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, a brother-in-law of Somchai. Thaksin was ousted in a bloodless military coup in September 2006 after months of protests by the alliance.

It accused Thaksin and his allies of corruption and abuse of power. Thaksin is in exile, a fugitive from a conviction for violating a conflict of interest law. The group says Somchai is merely a Thaksin puppet and should go.

However, Somchai has stood his ground, saying his departure would be a blow to democracy.

In his televised address Thursday from the northern city of Chiang Mai, Somchai accused the alliance of “holding the country hostage and the public hostage.” Somchai has been in the pro-government stronghold since he returned from a summit in Peru on Wednesday.

The protests, which gathered pace three months ago when demonstrators overran the prime minister’s offices, have paralyzed the government, battered the stock market, spooked foreign investors and dealt a serious blow to the tourism industry.

“If the government uses an emergency decree and decides to crack down on protesters, the army may decide to intervene to prevent that,” said Panithan Wattanayagorn, a political science professor at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University.

Until now, Somchai has not tried to forcibly oust protesters from his office compound and urged police to exercise restraint during the group’s forays outside the walls. Still, at least six people have been killed thus far in political violence.

Wire reports

  • 0

    smithinjapan

    Bad move for the PM if he truly wants to stay in power. If there's some kind of assault on the airports and demostrators are hurt/killed, it's going to make the PM look even worse, and calls for his head will rise exponentially. What's more, the military's not going to like, if they choose to follow, any orders to storm the airports, and a coup may indeed be in the works.

    What's with Thailand these days anyway... wasn't there a coup just a year or so ago?

  • 0

    rjd_jr

    PAD are Thailand's terrorists.

  • 0

    Scrote

    If the demonstrators were prevented from taking food and drink into the airport they would eventually be starved out without force having to be used. Yet it seems that they are allowed to do as they please.

    The wealthy urban types that are behind these demonstrations may soon find themselves out of work thanks to their foolish actions.

  • 0

    soldave

    rjd - I take it that is your personal opinion rather than anything officially recognized?

  • 0

    neverknow2

    If the demonstrators were prevented from taking food and drink into the airport they would eventually be starved out without force having to be used

    If these people could be influenced in any way, they wouldnt be in there in the first place.

  • 0

    elbudamexicano

    Well, if we look at the history of moder day Thailand, these kind of demonstrations against their government aren't as rare as we would all like to think, in the LAND OF SMILES, while we are having a nice cold tropical drink on some exotic hot beach, but under all those smiles their seems to be a lot of hate for the ruling class, yes, just like in any other country.

  • 0

    sickearth

    from first day of the airport protesting until now(from what i know) the runway and migration area in the airport are still ok to use.

    the protester did not close the runway. the thai airport can / should just let all the departed flight get out of the country rather than shut the whole airport down at one.

  • 0

    rjd_jr

    Well let's see soldave. What is a terrorist:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=terrorist&r=66

    "1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism. 2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others."

    Let's see, I think that going by the definition of terrorism and terrorist, clearly PAD members are terrorists. Threatening violence, taking over government buildings and shutting down airports, disrupting a major Thai economic source, gunfire and explosions, etc. etc. What else should we call these protestors, freedom fighters, lol. Let's see how far such antics would go outside of Thailand. That PAD thugs aren't "officially" sanctioned as terrorists means absolutely nothing.

    I (and many many others) see PAD for what they are, terrorists.

  • 0

    sickearth

    terrorist also include those government's supporter gang shoot dead an anti-gov in changmai(north) too? it was daylight in public yesterday!

    what is the dead threat to those people from bangkok or south if theyever step foot up north? (that was long even before thaksin has been kicked out!)

    what about the other group waring red carry gun wallking in an equally big group as the yellow t-shirt?

    do not forget about those with hand grenade too!

    What else should we call these protesters? the peaceful government supporter?

  • 0

    gonemad

    "1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism. 2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others."

    This definition does not make sense, as it would include, among others, any military, any violent criminal, many politicians (their stupidity frightens me), etc

    The inflationary and indiscriminate use of the term "terrorism" has rendered it useless for any meaningful discussion. It's rather an indicator that the person who uses it is running out of arguments.

  • 0

    rajakumar

    Somchai wongsawat PPP politics,Limthongkul(media thailand) PAD politics,and their political supporters making negotiations for changes. Thailand politics and supporters of PAD politics ,now want more PAD influence in Thailand.

    PAD wants a thailand with less money politics.

    They feel thailand has been damaged by money politics of past governance and also present governance which is has close ties with Thaksin/Shin-temasek woes. There is now many new problems in tourism thailand,under those thai people smiles.

    Thailand became richer but now they have new problems which come with being richer. More competitions in same kind of business without more diversity of business is leading to problems.

    Take the thai motorbike taxi operator,before they made huge money but now with so much motorbike taxi operators is hard for them to make enough.The distribution of work and the distributions of wealth in thailand need changes via more dynamic change of systems at the top .

    The administration of thailand must tackle the new problems facing thailand in wealth distribution woes, thai society woes and in job systems changes.

    If we read the posts on nationmultimedia.com we can realise the problems in thailand in more details.

    The reality of way of things in thai society is complex,which foreign tourist people/foreign media does not try to learn more about ,because of the complexities in learning thailand society politics/thai language.

    I do not think that I know much about thai society politics,as I do not know thai language to understand what thai people say or what thai media says,when I travel there.

  • 0

    rjd_jr

    Interesting how some here are so conveniently ignoring the tactics of the PAD. “Peaceful” protests, lol. The fact is these demonstrators are but a small fraction of the total Thai population. Whatever sympathies they may have had in the beginning, whatever good will they previously merited from Thais and foreigners alike, have long gone in the wake of their hostility, threats, and acts of sabotaging airports and the like.

    Again, what country would allow its citizens to make threats and disrupt airports? Peaceful protests are the hallmark of what earns respect and admiration from people around the world. That is the democratic way. Doesn’t it tell you something when many foreigners are cancelling their vacation plans to Thailand and many are expressing their disgust at this whole situation (many of them former PAD sympathizers?). When is this insanity going to stop, what is to say the next PM won’t make the PAD happy as weren’t they supposed to be satisfied Samak was gone?

    It doesn’t take a phD or in depth analysis to see what a farce this whole thing is. The PAD views this government/PM as corrupt and what is their solution? To have certain social groups have the vote in choosing representatives, and taking that right away from the rural class? Yea, that sure sounds empowering and “democratic” to all Thais.

    But that is all irrelevant you see. Again if it were peaceful protests and demonstrations many would have no problems with this whole deal. There’s a fine line between peaceful demonstrations and making threats and disrupting lives. Again this is a small percentage of the total population involved in this mess. How do you think the people whose lives are disrupted by this nonsense feel? What about the Thai citizen who makes their earning from the tourist trade, or even those who make their earning from working in government who cannot even go to their offices? And so on and so forth.

  • 0

    gonemad

    rjd, when you don't try to hide behind improper buzzwords, you start to make a lot of sense. I can only agree with your last posting.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all