Trio cleared over 2005 London bombings
LONDON —
Three men were found not guilty Tuesday of helping to plan the July 7, 2005 suicide bombings in London which killed 56 people, although two were convicted on lesser charges.
Relatives of the victims, meanwhile, renewed their calls for an independent inquiry into the attacks, which were the deadliest terrorist bombings in British history, saying that no one had yet been brought to justice.
Waheed Ali, 25, Mohammed Shakil, 32, and Sadeer Saleem, 28—the first, and still the only, individuals charged in connection with the attacks—were accused of carrying out a two-day reconnaissance mission seven months before the bombings on three Underground trains and a double-decker bus.
The sites allegedly considered included the Natural History Museum and the London Aquarium.
But Ali and Shakil were convicted of a second charge of conspiring to attend a place for terrorist training, and will be sentenced Wednesday.
As the verdicts were read out, after eight days of deliberation by the jury, Ali smiled, Saleem wiped his eyes and Shakil mouthed “thank you” to the jurors.
Outside the court, in a statement read by his lawyer, Saleem criticized police and prosecutors for charging him based on “guilt by association” and despite having only “the flimsiest of evidence.”
“I am indebted to these 12 courageous individuals who have now cleared my name and allowed me the opportunity of seeing my children grow up,” Saleem added, referring to the jury.
The verdict in the three-month trial at Kingston Crown Court follows the trio’s earlier trial which ended in August 2008 after the jury failed to reach a verdict.
The men, who grew up in the same South Asian community in the northern English city of Leeds as July 7 bombers Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shezhad Tanweer, were arrested in March 2007 and charged the following month.
During the trial, they admitted making a trip to London in December 2004 with the two other London bombers Hasib Hussain and Jermaine Lindsay, but insisted it was a “social outing.”
Ali said he wanted to visit his sister in the capital and the group used the opportunity to see London’s landmarks, but prosecutors alleged they were conducting a “hostile reconnaissance” mission.
The court heard that between 2001 and the London bombings, both Ali and Shakil made visits to Pakistan and attended terror training camps.
Ali visited the camps with Khan in 2001, and Shakil made a similar trip with Khan in 2003, where they were trained to use machine guns, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and assault rifles.
“These two men learned to fight at training camps attended by other terrorists,” John McDowall, the head of the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, said after the verdict.
He added: “Ali and Shakil clearly associated with, and shared the terrorist beliefs of, the London bombers.”
The pair were arrested on March 22, 2007 at Manchester airport as they attempted to board a flight to Pakistan.
Saleem was detained the same day at his home.
None of the men attempted to hide their support for jihad and the defense of Muslim lands during the trial, but all three said they did not support suicide bombings and were unaware of the July 7 attacks before they happened.
The July 7 attacks—which occurred as Group of Eight leaders were meeting in Scotland, and a day after a euphoric London celebrated winning the 2012 Olympic Games—killed the four bombers and 52 other people.
Campaigners and relatives of the victims said a full independent inquiry into the bombings was required immediately.
“We are not looking for people to blame, but we also know that we have not been told the whole truth,” said Graham Foulkes, whose 22-year-old son David was killed in one of the Underground bombings.
Wire reports






Order by Time Order by Popularity
6 Comments
Login to comment
0
teleprompter
I read something like this and can only conclude that many in the UK (and Europe, for that matter) crave dhimmitude.
Statements from clowns like Archbishop Rowan Williams only confirm my belief.
0
smithinjapan
teleprompter: "Statements from clowns like Archbishop Rowan Williams only confirm my belief."
Well, rest assured no one is concerned about your beliefs, nor does your 'conclusion' on the issue have anyone questioning the sentencing any more than they would otherwise. These people were cleared by a jury of their peers, bottom line. It's in the UK (and Europe, for that matter), so naturally you're resorting to your sad nature and making remarks that show the inferiority of your posts, and the insecurity you suffer as an American who opinions are shared by a very small minority. If this were in the US, you'd be searching for a way to blame Obama.
Bottom line, these guys were found not guilty. Any and all leads need to continue to be followed to find those who were ACTUALLY responsible.
0
Madverts
"Statements from clowns like Archbishop Rowan Williams only confirm my belief."
As do all the garbage you regurgitate from your hate blogs. It doesn't make it fact, and I fail to see how UK citizen's can "crave" "dhimmitude", as the word itself is simply a label created by a rightwing hack.
And we all know how radicals like to label.
0
Muchakucha
There are overwhelmingly obvious facts about Islamic doctrine, spelled out clearly in the Koran and repeatedly cited by Islamists all over the world, that some people just choose to ignore.
But as for Britons 'craving dhimmitude' - they certainly do not. However, they seem to be totally ignorant of what the Koran says, or what allowing Sharia courts to operate in the UK will lead to.
BTW, 'dhimmi' is most certainly a real word, meaning a non-Muslim living under Islamic juristriction- and consequently having to submit to various special restrictions and taxes. 'Dhimmitude' is a perfectly acceptable derivative term meaning 'the act of being a dhimmi'.
As for the acquittal: can't argue against it if the evidence wasn't conclusive. UK justice remains fair, and available to all. Until Sharia takes hold of course...
0
Madverts
Anybody that honestly thinks the British will embrace an attitude of concession, surrender and appeasement towards Islamic demands needs their heads looking at.
I suggest the simplest eye-opener would be to go to a football match, sit in the stands of one team , whilst wearing the other teams' colours and shout "Allah Ackbar".
Back to top