Trump has a history of questionable behavior with women: NY Times

This guy is a certifiable text book case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. This is how little rich privileged boys act when they have no one to teach them respect for others.

Barbara Res, who oversaw construction of Trump’s Manhattan business headquarters, said he would sometimes interrupt meetings with comments about women’s figures.

I imagine him to have some kind of letcherous Tourette's syndrome.

Trump (interrupting meeting) "Buns.... Curves....boirds Knickors....hooters !"

He's a total dunderhead.

"A Trump representative did not immediately respond to a request by Reuters for comment."

Get used to it America.

Donald J. Trump is already sick of your whining.

Donald J. Trump's Loser Americans, just STFU.

This is nothing new. I'm more concerned with Hillary's questionable behavior over the years, especially with setting up a private email server in her house.

I couldn't agree more, Trump should really think of Bill Clinton as the exemplar for how to treat women.

Trump supporters don't care about stuff like this. Once the white trash decides to vote for the bigot it's not like we're going to expect any outrage over the treatment of women. Look elsewhere.

https://youtu.be/nnMsUaT6e8k NutJob Washington post claim that Trump posed as John Miller 25yrs ago to promote his own PR. Audio does not sound like Trump at all.

Since the media cannot beat Trump they are manufacturing all sorts of lies, semi-lies, and partial Truths with lies. A new US media low.

"They take care of their asses"

"No one "cherishes" or "respects" women more than him"

Nobody loves asses more than Donald Trump and asses love nobody more than Donald Trump.

He called her "honey bunch?"

Oh, the horror. Obviously he's evil and should be sent out of the solar system, riding on a rocket.

And....wandering hands Joe gets a free pass...

Bill Clinton, Berlusconi, DSK the list of politicians who had 'questionable behavior with women' and made it to the top is endless. In fact I often think its often detrimental not to show testosterone or bad taste, thats what make you real or 'one of us' in voters' eyes.

Re Trump I think he is like that with everyone, men and women.

There's only 1 thing that scares me more than President Trump, that is another President Clinton. There simply isn't any good choice. Both of these candidates are bad for the USA, bad for the World, and bad for all living things in the universe.

"None of the above" ... but sadly, I'll probably end up voting for Mr. Trump. It isn't a vote FOR him, instead it is a vote AGAINST, Ms. Clinton.

Trump supporters don't care about stuff like this. Once the white trash decides to vote for the bigot it's not like we're going to expect any outrage over the treatment of women. Look elsewhere.

Hillary supporters love to deflect from their own candidates treatment of women. Once bigoted and intolerant know-it-all's decide to vote for a power hungry authoritarian it's not like we are going to expect outrage over her treatment of women who were raped and sexually assaulted by her husband. Trump is no model of gentlemanly behavior, but if you expect Hillary Clinton to care about the average American - male or female - you are dumber than the "white trash" the racist Left disdain so much.

Wolfram, who was raped by her husband?

it's not like we are going to expect outrage over her treatment of women who were raped and sexually assaulted by her husband.

I've seen this talking point in the bubble recently, so kudos for repeating it to the outside world. Can you please give me the nuance of the story, since it's only recently come up, right?

It's amazing that some people actually believe Trump would be better than Hillary. Just goes to show how effective smear campaigns can be.

" Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, has been publicly accused by many women of sexual misconduct; one woman (Juanita Broaddrick) has publicly accused him of rape, another (Kathleen Willey) states Clinton groped her without consent, and a third accuser (Paula Jones) states that Clinton sexually harassed her..........Clinton has only admitted extramarital relationships with Monica Lewinsky and Gennifer Flowers."

And Trump called someone 'honey bunch'...

He's a clod. That's not in dispute. However, the short memories of the Dems are remarkable.

Trump has a history of questionable behavior with women:

it's true for every man at least once in his life time...!

Is above story the one times apologized?

There is a reason the NYT is pretty much out of business and lost more than half of it's circulation and is now online. Having Hillary as president and wanting this Charlatan to keep the status quo of keeping the failed Obama policies in place with the baggage, the questionable and lawlessness of this woman's conduct in Benghazi, her financial and questionable campaign contributions, her unwillingness to disclose any of her speeches. The woman would serve the public much better if she exchanged her traditional pantsuits for a nice prison State issued one.

Hillary supporters love to deflect from their own candidates treatment of women. Once bigoted and intolerant know-it-all's decide to vote for a power hungry authoritarian it's not like we are going to expect outrage over her treatment of women who were raped and sexually assaulted by her husband.

Dems can't be racist.....because they are Dems?? And White Dems can't be racist because they are....White Dems? ROFL Typical liberal logic in play as usual and these are the people that demand if a man feels like a woman he should have the right to go wherever he wants, even if that means to violate a woman's private space.

Trump is no model of gentlemanly behavior, but if you expect Hillary Clinton to care about the average American - male or female - you are dumber than the "white trash" the racist Left disdain so much.

BINGO!

Just goes to show how effective smear campaigns can be.

Yup. Just like that whole "vote for change" thing. Anyways, out with baboon. And in,on, forward with Trump or Hillary. . . .she's gona make america whole again.

When did "honey bunch" become derogatory? -and what is a "honey bunch" anyway? = I think this "reporter" screwed up her "report" and meant "honey bun" or "honey buns" = a cheap honey glazed (grossly manufactured) donut that gives you a fat butt.

How come Trump's national spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, doesn't have a problem with him?

Trump has a questionable history of behavior with women: NY Times

Like nobody else has a questionable history of behavior with women? How many women have come out and accused Trump of sexually abusing them as is the case with other famous people (such as Bill Clinton & Bill Cosby)?

Is calling a girl honey bunch and commenting to somebody next to you about her anatomy a sexual abuse? I don't think so. Besides, if that's the case, aren't women also guilty of the same thing?

Years later, when Res says she had gained weight, she said Trump told her: “You like your candy.”

So does he, apparently. And there must be a tonne of cartenoid in his candies. And don't get me started on the squirrel living on top of his head.

Himajun: However, the short memories of the Dems are remarkable.

Oh I was around in the 90s. I remember the news stories.

But this has to be about Hillary, right? That has to be the hook or else you're just rehashing a story about a candidate's spouse that everyone already knows. See how Wolfpack specifically said, "her treatment of women who were raped and sexually assaulted by her husband"? Therein lies the hook.

I can't wait to hear the story. I'm sure there's a lot of brand spanking new information being circulated by people decades after the fact. Strange how the timing worked out....

I get what you're saying, SuperLib but that's a pretty big glass house they have there...Bill will be in the White House again, no?

Trump has a questionable history of behavior with women

. . . .yet its all good when obama says "you put lipstick on a pig . . . "

But when Trump says something like that the libs slam him. How 1-sided !!

I'm going to preface this with the following - if you've ever worked in a male-dominated culture or in a high-pressure environment, you have to be able to take outrageous comments and develop thick skin.

For everyone that calls for workplace equality and needs everyone to show proper respect to each other in every situation, please see what a trading floor is like. When hundreds of millions of dollars are on the line, you don't care about honorifics or being nice - obscenities about race, gender, etc are all thrown out the door.

These women are crazy. Look if you don't like the work environment, no one is keeping you there - you can quit and no one would care because you obviously can't handle the environment, get offended easily, are too sensitive, etc. They even say that Trump gave them opportunities when no one else would. Do they think that there's such thing as a perfect job ? There's always something that sucks about a job, and no job is 100% perfect.

Please stop complaining when in the 80s and 90s, workplace equality was nonexistent, and women were still seen as housewives. He gave you a chance to make your life better, and even if he's sexist like the TYPICAL CULTURE back then, you wouldn't be here bashing him just for either publicity or because he's running away with the election.

If he did not say about Bill Clinton, Times wouldn't jump to create this story. But I wonder he enjoy having free name ads. He spent money telling he has $2 billion. But he is short now when GOP want his money. I wonder he does not want to reveal his last year's income because he is not rich. Adelson might give him $200 million. But some billionaires are not supporting him yet.

But this has to be about Hillary, right?

Only because this story is about a rude and crude old man who is running for the same office as Hillary. Therefore the lack of perspective with respect to the self-serving old lady's repeated excuses for a man accused of rape and sexual abuse is glaringly obvious.

Strange how the timing worked out....

Would you also believe that old (but not so surprising) stories about Trumps boorish behavior are not legitimate news? I think not. Yet Hillary's past is off limits? Trump is politically incorrect (as well as crude) but it isn't as though he doesn't promote and support women in his business. In fact, his daughter is much more influential in his businesses than his sons. Conversely, Hillary treats men she sees as beneath her like dirt. Word has gotten out about how Hillary has mistreated the police, Secret Service and military personnel while her husband was an elected official. Perhaps the public deserves to hear more about this still relatively unknown side of Hillary's character.

Far as I am concerned Bill Clinton is the worst because even the Oval Office was not sacred less no the marriage. Hillary stayed with him through the whole public hearings of Bill's liaisons that makes her guilty by association. Because what real woman would put up with that..

Because what real woman would put up with that..

Lots of them. People marry for life and do what they can to try to make it work. Anyone who does otherwise wasn't truly committed to their marriage in the first place.

Hillary is candidate, not Bill. At least Hillary did bot bring 28 years old young boy to tell her daughter here is your new father. He can't speak English well yet Take care of your new father. Beside that, she does not have several ex husband.

Hitting Trump about women problems is like hitting Hillary about "enabling" Bill's women problem. It gets you nowhere. Focus on issues, like whether the breakup of the US will be peaceful or there will be civil war; when will the breakup take place; what happens to the nuclear weapons after the breakup.

Hillary is candidate, not Bill. 

Those who think that are being pretty naive. It is for a bill & hillary ticket americans will be voting for in November the same way they voted for the bush dynasty with GW! You don't elect someone whose hubby or dad has been president of the us without at least partially/virtually reinstating the hubby/dad. Not saying its good or bad but Bill's achievements and errors are relevant to this campaign.

Damage control for the new film "Clintons Cash". Nice play NYT. lots of knees must be hurting right now. MSM propaganda at it's best, while Hillary sings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUt_KF9vI10

Those supporting Trump, please return to the US immediately.

Oh come on we all know the reason Hilary was mad at bill cause he got caught. Before they were in the Whitehouse Hilary probably said she wanted to be President but in that day and age a woman was out of the question. So she told her husband to run and he could screw whoever he pleased while she ran things

I read the whole article and think that, for all the slanting, what it shows is a dearth of bad material. The article begins with the story of him offering a bathing suit to a woman — a model — who arrived at a pool party without a bathing suit. When she put the bathing suit on, he said "wow." Would he have been mocking her if he'd failed to say "wow"? If this is all they have Trump is pretty much home free.

Would you also believe that old (but not so surprising) stories about Trumps boorish behavior are not legitimate news? I think not. Yet Hillary's past is off limits? Trump is politically incorrect (as well as crude) but it isn't as though he doesn't promote and support women in his business. In fact, his daughter is much more influential in his businesses than his sons. Conversely, Hillary treats men she sees as beneath her like dirt. Word has gotten out about how Hillary has mistreated the police, Secret Service and military personnel while her husband was an elected official. Perhaps the public deserves to hear more about this still relatively unknown side of Hillary's character.

We all know Trump is far from being a perfect candidate and most people can and will admit it, however, the left treat Hillary as a Saint and that the woman has NEVER in her life made ANY mistakes are was EVER involved in ANY scandals. Funny how the left will go through hoops to shelter her and push aside any doubts or scandals about her as fabricated. More testament that the Unicornverse Dems and libs reside in is a clear indication of how far they have fallen off into the alternate dimension.

HimajinMAY. 15, 2016 - 10:18AM JST However, the short memories of the Dems are remarkable.]

I wouldn't go around tossing out casual insults at peoples' memories when you seem to have forgotten that Bill Clinton isn't running for President.

This is an election, not a cheerleading contest. We're supposed to be voting for who we think will be the best leader of the country, not blindly supporting the side that we threw our lot in with because it feels good to pretend we've won a competition.

"We all know Trump is far from being a perfect candidate and most people can and will admit it, however, the left treat Hillary as a Saint and that the woman has NEVER in her life made ANY mistakes are was EVER involved in ANY scandals."

Funny that many Sanders supporters despise Clinton. Some have said they would refuse to vote for her if she is the nominee.

What in the name of ROFLing Bolshevik unicornverses are you Benghaziing about?

Bill Clinton isn't running for President.

No his wife is, and she's just as qualified to lead America as Brett Favre's wife is to lead the Green Bay Packers.

Funny that many Sanders supporters despise Clinton.

And yet, she seems to be the nominee, that is, if she's not indicted or even after.

Some have said they would refuse to vote for her if she is the nominee.

Some, but the majority of liberals will since Sanders won't get the nomination.

Once again, how come Trump's national spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, doesn't have a problem with him?

but the majority of liberals

Trump is very Liberal: Higher taxes and more government healthcare. He's just slightly wrong on the 100-foot tall wall.

You know the left wing media is desperate when they sink to attacking a candidates conduct with the opposite sex.

How about Clinton's marital problems.

Give me a break. Media bias much?

Note: I despise Trump. But I despise blatant media bias and brown nosing even more.

. . . .yet its all good when obama says "you put lipstick on a pig . . . " But when Trump says something like that the libs slam him. How 1-sided !!

Again, with this half-truth, WC?? I have said it before and I will say it again. That quote is not sexist, and Obama was not the first to use the term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipstick_on_a_pig

"Sheesh!"

I think he's absolutely right on the wall. As for taxes, I'd rather pay more taxes and grin and bear it than have a habitual liar in the White House, that's for darn sure.

Poll of JT. more Trump supporters.

Throughout his early career in the mid to late '80's as Trump was successfully navigating through one of the most corrupt construction industries in the country to become a brand-name business mogul the language and behavior with women that would have gone in on in back rooms and behind the scenes would probably make all our heads spin.There was virtually no aspect of the New York City construction industry that was not affected by organized crime and racketeering which makes it is a backhanded compliment actually when put in context that he was able to deal with mob-controlled companies, Democratic politicians and unions folks legally and successfully. The bottom line is that Donald Trump has a record of getting things done the right way (not the Clinton way) in an environment when you are dealing with less than respectable figures.

So you want the US government just to remove the American Indians off their sacred land in a very cruel fashion. OK, it's cruel but you are free to think that. 100 foot high wall? Really? Is it possible to built a 100 foot wall 2000 miles straight?

Taking a step back from that, the idea of building a wall is an absolutely moronic idea, supported by scared, misinformed, whites. 30-40% of all illegals in the US came here legally and subsequently overstayed their visas. Trump's plan will do nothing to address visa overstayers. If one really wanted to curb illegal immigration, you'd simply place a massive fine for every illegal immigrant a firm employed. Unless you decrease the demand for illegal labor, people will keep coming.

I also think the idea of building the 125-foot (that includes 25 feet underground to prevent tunneling) x 2000 mile wall is stupid but...

I think he's absolutely right on the wall.

Other people think otherwise.

Once again, how come Trump's national spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, doesn't have a problem with him?

I have no idea, but a couple of possibilities:

1) She actually does have a problem with him. Do you know her personal feelings?

2) She actually does have a problem with him, and sucks it up because he is powerful and she thinks she can get further with him than by announcing her problems with him.

3) He isn't attracted to her, so she has no problems because he doesn't focus on her.

4) He pays her to not have a problem with him.

Those are just a few possibilities off the top of my head. Again, I have no idea whatsoever, and the above isn't even speculation. It's simply a way to show that concluding there is nothing wrong with Trump simply because one woman doesn't appear to have a problem with him would be faulty logic as there are other possible reasons why she may not appear to have a problem with him.

Lots of them. People marry for life and do what they can to try to make it work. Anyone who does otherwise wasn't truly committed to their marriage in the first place.

Strangerland you have it all twisted backwards... If Bill Clinton was committed to the marriage he would not have cheated in the first place.

Blowing off steam as an excuse for cheating is the lowest and most pathetic excuse I have ever heard. It is saying the cheater treats himself as a toilet

Trump reminds me of Rodney Dangerfield's Thornton Melon character in Back to School:

Thornton Melon: Oh, you left out a bunch of stuff.

Dr. Phillip Barbay: Oh really? Like what for instance?

Thornton Melon: First of all you're going to have to grease the local politicians for the sudden zoning problems that always come up. Then there's the kickbacks to the carpenters, and if you plan on using any cement in this building I'm sure the teamsters would like to have a little chat with ya, and that'll cost ya. Oh and don't forget a little something for the building inspectors. Then there's long term costs such as waste disposal. I don't know if you're familiar with who runs that business but I assure you it's not the boyscouts.

Dr. Phillip Barbay: That will be quite enough, Mr. Melon! Maybe bribes, kickbacks and Mafia payoffs are how YOU do business! But they are NOT part of the legitimate business world! And they are certainly not part of anything I am doing in this class. Do I make myself clear, Mr. Melon!

Thornton Melon: Listen, Sherlock. While you were tucked away up here working on your ethics, I was out there busting my hump in the REAL world. And the reason guys like you got a place to teach is 'cause guys like me donate buildings.

The bottom line is that Donald Trump has a record of getting things done the right way (not the Clinton way) in an environment when you are dealing with less than respectable figures.

Who better to deal effectively with dirtbags than another dirtbag.

Strangerland you have it all twisted backwards... If Bill Clinton was committed to the marriage he would not have cheated in the first place.

I wasn't talking about Bill's commitment to the marriage though, was I. I was talking about Hillary's commitment to it.

The bottom line is that Donald Trump has a record of getting things done the right way

Really? Like getting Trump University accredited? Or giving a good return to his investors?

I've been there many times, that is an outright lie. Me too. I have personally talked to the Indian chiefs (one is my close friend) and they are upset about Trump's 100 foot wall.

Well, if he's the president, then the chiefs will have no choice or in the worst case scenario, Trump can fortify the border in that area and flood it with more border patrol and the National guard-heavily which would be the second option.

I am the one with the real truth on the matter. The total height of the wall will be 125 feet (from underground to the top). My Indian chief friend is worried about the border trapping the Indians from their family like what happened with North/South Korea.

That's another lie and you know it! That area already has a fence around it. Building a bigger wall is adding what is already there.

That is so cruel that Trump wants to build that gigantic wall Good on Trump Yes, you want Trump to mess with the Indians and make it Andrew Jackson Part 2. How would you like it if there was a 100-foot wall right next to your house, and on your land?

I never have to worry about that, I'm not in that situation and No, I am not empathetic to anyone that breaks the law and illegally comes to the US, since Obama who's time is running out won't do something about it, at least Trump is willing to talk and push this as a main agenda and for me, that's good enough. Either you have a border and a country or you don't.

Try that in Mexico. The Mexican government is very fierce and protective over their border, if you don't have the right papers, you will be kicked out or locked up. They are very strict about immigration. They wouldn't tolerate it and we shouldn't either!

I thought the below quoted comment is an interesting comment on NYT site, I think the part where she says that Trump vocalizes what other men think is pretty much true: I would say for the vast majority of men in the world at some point or another we have had those thoughts about women that he is vocalizing.

I am a feminist and a Democrat and I passionately oppose Trump's candidacy for president. That said, I don't find this article helpful. First, Trump openly expresses the thoughts that other men have but don't vocalize. They lack Trump's power and prestige, so they keep these things to themselves. We are not talking about a small percentage either. Look at how many men across the country watch porn. Once again, Trump will score points for saying and doing what other people wish they could. Great.

Second, any woman in America who has gotten involved in a co-ed organization (work, internships, even higher education) has experienced things like this. It's part of life. Deal with it and do your part to make change, like raising your sons to respect women. I was first propositioned by an older, more powerful man than I when I was 16. Thanks to my father, in whom I confided, I came out unscathed. It was scary and it left an unsettling memory, enough so that I found my heart pounding in anxiety when I unexpectedly passed him on a staircase a few years later (thankfully, he walked right by me without any sign of recognition).

This experience has repeated itself several times since. Each instance made me stronger and more able to fend for myself as a woman. Were the experiences unpleasant, uninvited, and unsettling? Yes. But they are part of life. Sorry, but this article fails to indict Trump for anything other than crude behavior that women encounter every day.

Trump is no model of gentlemanly behavior, but if you expect Hillary Clinton to care about the average American - male or female - you are dumber than the "white trash" the racist Left disdain so much.

Case in point the recent primary in WV. Hillary took a sever beating from Sanders. What's important to remember is that back in 2008, Hillary won this state with over 60% compared to Obama. Back then the thing was "it was the poor whites sticking up for Hillary (white) over Obama (Black). Funny, Obama won the state in the primaries in 2012.

But this time she lost. Much of it in fact on her stances on the coal industry, and her recent comments on putting those poor whites out of work, and the face to face meeting with an out of work coal worker and her blatant denial of saying what she said was caught for all to see.

The exit polling for WV showed that even though Bernie won by huge margins, those same voter said that for the General election, that they would vote for Trump instead of Hillary. WV is a strong Dem state, but a very different Dem than you would find in CA or NY. The late, long term Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (who was a Klegal in the KKK but many seem to forget) ruled over the state and kept the pork coming and the state has stayed Dem for a long time. The fact that Hillary can't win there, is telling.

If all you are going to do is call people who support Trump as bigoted racists, as former Mexican president Fox has done, all you are going to do is make more people wind up voting for him. I don't think people are afraid to be un PC and vote how they feel, and not how they are "supposed to feel."

Bill Clinton isn't running for President.

He is a Democrat He is husband of a candidate He has done much worse that call someone 'honey bunch' But that's Ok, he's a Clinton...

If Hillary wins, he'll be back in his old hunting grounds. It is an issue. For Hillary's side to be pearl-clutching over 'honey bunch' is just...jarring.

Sorry, but this article fails to indict Trump for anything other than crude behavior that women encounter every day.

Trump is actually fairly open minded and moderate coming from the construction industry which is about as high on the super male-dominated industries" spectrum as it is possible to get.

Wolfpack: the self-serving old lady's repeated excuses for a man accused of rape and sexual abuse is glaringly obvious.

What repeated excuses has she given? Is this going to turn into a "stand by your man" vs "leave the bum" argument that's been going on for centuries?

Would you also believe that old (but not so surprising) stories about Trumps boorish behavior are not legitimate news? I think not. Yet Hillary's past is off limits?

I think the Right is trying hard to twist Bill's indiscretions into her problem, and that's dangerous. The GOP needs more support from women but they will have to walk a fine line if they want to blame the woman for the man here. It still doesn't help the GOP's women problem which can only be corrected by expanding the base. This is just a cheap parlor trick and you have the potential for women to be offended if you don't play it right. Or even if you do.

Himajin: Bill will be in the White House again, no?

Good point.

Serrano: Oh and don't forget a little something for the building inspectors.

A buddy of mine can quote that rant word for word...heh

Alphaape: I don't think people are afraid to be un PC and vote how they feel, and not how they are "supposed to feel."

I understand that they are emotional, but the point is to make good decisions. I keep seeing these articles talking about how the GOP is "warming up" to Trump and it's all just a sham. They didn't like Trump then and they don't like him now, but, party before country. If the party nominates an idiot then I guess people will just vote for the idiot?

Some Republican politicians gave very honest and direct negative opinions about Trump and to hear them say that they'll support him (or "support the nominee" so they don't have to say his name) is a joke because they know that I know they hate him. And now they are going to vote for the guy? Jesus. They sold out their ideals as soon as the GOP party told them to. Very weak men.

"Barbara Fife, a deputy New York mayor in the 1990s, recalls Trump telling her at her City Hall office that he was in a hurry because he had “a great date tonight with a model for Victoria’s Secret,” she told the Times."

“I saw it as immature, quite honestly,” Fife was quoted as saying. - article

Donald J. Trump, super freak

If the Trump campaign could get off getting off there might be a campaign under the slimy belly of Trump's history of accomplishment.

That whole, "calling Mexicans rapists" thing.

The Main Stream Media didn't report on Trump except when he began the campaign ten monthes ago with the racist hook. The business genius at work. (Macy's promptly dropped the entire line of Trump Chinese Made goods.)

Lots of them. People marry for life and do what they can to try to make it work. Anyone who does otherwise wasn't truly committed to their marriage in the first place.

Bill and Hillary have an open marriage. No one feels sorry that Bill has treated her like dirt as if they had a committed relationship to one another. Hillary has enabled his mistreatment of other women and has herself mistreated his victims to protect her own interests - which are money and political power. She is only committed to Bill in the sense that they help each other get rich and gain power. That is Hillary's "woman" problem. She could have stopped his serial abuse of women but stood by and did nothing.

What repeated excuses has she given? Is this going to turn into a "stand by your man" vs "leave the bum" argument that's been going on for centuries?

Plenty of women have been abused by Bill - and Hillary considered them nothing but bimbos and trailer trash that needed to be managed. Of course she is going to do her best Tammy Wynette for him. Bubba has been her meal ticket for decades. None of these bimbos were ever going to get in the way of that no matter how badly he mistreated them. It's funny how the Left are all about supporting women until women get in the way of achieving their ideological goals. It reminds me of NOW back in the 1990's before Bill was caught with his pants down with the young Monica. They used to consider relationships and the power difference between men and women in the work place as harassment. After Bill that way of thinking disappeared completely and NOW doesn't get taken seriously anymore.

If the party nominates an idiot then I guess people will just vote for the idiot?

An idiot or a criminal. What kind of choice is that?

Hillary has enabled his mistreatment of other women

Ah, there it is. The hook. Blame Hillary for Bill with fuzzy "enable" commets. . Do you think most Americans will buy it? Will it be a strong enough distraction from the GOP's war on women? Time will tell. I wish you luck.

Ah, there it is. The hook. Blame Hillary for Bill with fuzzy "enable" commets. . Do you think most Americans will buy it? Will it be a strong enough distraction from the GOP's war on women? Time will tell. I wish you luck.

Most Americans will buy it and have been for a long time. Remember back in 1992 when Bill was first running, and the famed "Bimbo Eruption Squad" to help her counter the claims against Bill from various women. People remember, een if you chose not to.

I think the Right is trying hard to twist Bill's indiscretions into her problem

No..personally I think they should clean house before they preach to others.

Plenty of women have been abused by Bill Well, there is Bill who had fun with actual adults...then there is Dennis Hastert who molested boys while he was the no 3. person in the USA.

An idiot or a criminal. What kind of choice is that? Criminal? Dennis Hastert is not running for president. Idiot must be Donald Trump thinking he is going to build a 100-foot wall for 2000 miles and thinking he's going to "negotiate" the debt like he's buying a used car. But I'm not aware of any criminal running for President at the moment. Again, Dennis Haster is in the news because he's going to prison NOT because he's running for president.

Supposed to be a victim of Trump was on interview. Times misquoted and Trump did not behave like Times article.

Is this why Times openly apologized about issuing article?

She said he was a gentleman to all of girls, and video was displayed. Trump happily dancing center of girls on line.

Tomes apologized. Not to Trump but to subscribers.

@SuperLib:

Ah, there it is. The hook. Blame Hillary for Bill with fuzzy "enable" commets. . Do you think most Americans will buy it?

Actually - given the facts - yes, a many people will buy it. I am no Trump fan but being crude and condoning Bill's rape and sexual assault of multiple women are two completely different things.

Will it be a strong enough distraction from the GOP's war on women?

What war on women? Did Hillary vote for that too when she was in Congress?

@nishikat:

Plenty of women have been abused by Bill Well, there is Bill who had fun with actual adults...then there is Dennis Hastert who molested boys while he was the no 3. person in the USA.

I agree that Hastert is a terrible person but what is the point of bringing that up? He is going to jail and therefore will not be running for president. Does going after Hastert supposed to excuse Hillary's covering up for Bill's sexual assaults? I don't think so. By the way, rape and assault are not "fun" for the victims.

I guess any lie to protect and deflect from Hillary's hatred for the women that Bill chose as his mistresses is worth it - just ask the NY Times.

toshikoMAY. 16, 2016 - 10:27PM JST Supposed to be a victim of Trump was on interview. Times misquoted and Trump did not behave like Times article.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ehidkNhkw

So it turns out the women that were supposedly abused by Trump say the NY Times misrepresented their story and that Trump is a great guy. Guess the Old Gray Lady missed on this one. I am sure they will do better with their next hit piece. Meanwhile the Times still has not interviewed the women that were the victims of Hillary's husbands abuse.