Calls mount for international action in Congo
GOMA —
International pressure mounted Sunday for Europe to send an emergency security force to halt strife in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo as thousands more fled fighting between rebels and government forces.
Belgium’s foreign minister said U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon favors a special European force until full U.N. peacekeeping reinforcements can be found. A French minister visiting the conflict zone called for international action to counter which she called “catastrophic” conditions for refugees.
An estimated 250,000 people have been displaced since new fighting between renegade Tutsi general Laurent Nkunda and government forces erupted in August. This has worsened over the past six weeks with the main eastern city of Goma now surrounded by rebels.
Fighting around another town, Masisi, has sent another 6,000 people into the centre of the town over the past two days, U.N. Mission in Congo (MONUC) spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Jean-Paul Dietrich said.
Nkunda’s forces have fought pro-government militia and Rwandan Hutu militia around Masisi in recent days. Dietrich said U.N. forces had sent reinforcements to the town and started extra helicopter and ground patrols in the region.
Belgian Foreign Minister Karel De Gucht said the U.N. secretary general had asked Belgium to take part in an emergency European force for Congo.
Because the extra 3,000 peacekeepers approved by the U.N. Security Council will take time to deploy, “the United Nations hopes that a European military force could come and fill in the gap during this period,” De Gucht told Belgian television.
He said the force could stay for up to six months but that Belgian wanted three or four other countries to take part.
The minister’s spokesman Bart Ouvry said that Ban had talked about an interim European force during De Gucht’s discussions with him this week in New York.
The question is expected to be raised at NATO ministerial talks in Brussels this week as well as at an Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) meeting in Helsinki.
The Congo government said it was “open” to the idea. But Nkunda’s rebels described the diplomatic development as an “unpleasant surprise.
“We thought the United Nations were looking for a peaceful resolution to the crisis,” spokesman Bertran Bisimwa added, referring to talks at the weekend between U.N. special envoy Olusegun Obasanjo and President Joseph Kabila and Nkunda.
Belgium, the former colonial power, and France last month proposed sending troops to Nord-Kivu province to support MONUC, which is currently the biggest U.N. force in the world with 17,000 troops.
Other European states, including Germany, are not in favor of military support—preferring to back humanitarian organizations and political mediation.
France’s Humanitarian Affairs Minister Rama Yada said during a visit to Goma on Sunday that DR Congo was in a new “catastrophic” crisis.
“I don’t know what else it will take to make the international community act,” she said.
Leaders from Africa’s Great Lakes region will meet in Kenya on Dec 11 to discuss the crisis, the group’s Tanzanian presidency said. Ex-Tanzanian president Benjamin Mkapa has been traveling with Obasanjo, the former Nigerian president, during his peace initiative.
The Congolese army said Sunday it will host military chiefs from other countries in the region in Kinshasa this week for discussions.
Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Congo-Brazzaville, Sao Tome and Principe and Chad would all be represented, a spokesman said.
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
2 Comments
Login to comment
0
rjd_jr
This really breaks my heart. If there were valuable oil reserves there or in the area close to what is around the middle east area, we would have been there in a heartbeat. You want to talk about oppression and suffering? It makes me sick to see all these people suffering and the U.S. thumbing their nose at them.
0
Triumvere
...thumbing our nose?
Seriously, damned if you do, damned if you don't... people'd be crying "imperialism" and "violation of sovreignty" if the US were to attempt a military intervention. Where, may I ask, are the other world powers on this? Oh, yes, some have "proposed" sending troops but the likelyhood of anything comming from that in any reasonable time frame are about nil. And when the blue helmets get there, their orders will be "don't engage" and, finally "retreat"; another strategic withdrawl, a la Rwanda. Spare me.
Back to top