Monday May 28, 2012

U.N. meets on global food crisis

BERN —

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Monday held talks with key development agencies on how to tackle the crisis provoked by soaring food and fuel prices.

“This is an exciting time for the United Nations, but it is also a time when we are challenged to exert our best efforts to rise to the expectations that the world is placing on us,” Ban said ahead of meetings in the Swiss capital.

The United Nations was to hammer out a battle plan of emergency measures at the two-day conference in Berne, while exploring other longer-term measures to solve the global food crisis.

The talks were expected to see advocates of protectionism face off against those who favor opening up markets, as well as arguments between both supporters and opponents of biofuels.

Rising populations, strong demand from developing countries, increased cultivation of crops for biofuels and increasing floods and droughts have sent food prices soaring across the globe.

Ban met first with officials from the Universal Postal Union before holding main talks with 27 key U.N. agencies.

Also in Berne were Josette Sheeran, Executive Director of the UN’s World Food Programme; World Bank President Robert Zoellick; Jacques Diouf, head of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO); and Lennart Baage, president of the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD).

“I would like to thank you for your hospitality and your active support of the United Nations,” Ban told Swiss President Pascal Couchepin at a reception in the Swiss parliament.

Despite hosting the European headquarters of the organization, Switzerland did not formally join the United Nations until 2002 after a hotly-contested popular referendum.

Couchepin assured Ban he could count on continued Swiss support and participation in U.N. activities for “many years to come”.

In a statement on IFAD’s website, Baage said the international community needed to come up with an urgent response to the crisis, warning that the parallel threat of climate change would only heighten the risks for the world’s poor.

“Responding effectively to the impact of higher food prices must be a top priority for the global community,” he said.

But he criticized protectionist measures by developing countries such as Brazil, Egypt and Ghana, saying they would prove counter-effective in the long run.

“Some of these measures ... have not only contributed to the instability on global markets, but have also undermined the prices that producers are able to realize,” Baage said.

Instead, he hailed moves by countries such as Yemen and China, who have promoted credit facilities for those hardest hit by rising prices, and subsidies for production in Pakistan, the Philippines and Jordan.

Besides seeing Couchepin, Ban met Monday evening with Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey to discuss development issues, climate change and the current food crisis.

In Geneva, the United Nations’ outspoken independent expert on the right to food, Jean Ziegler, said the meeting on Monday marked “an essential day for hungry people around the world.”

Ziegler, who is from Switzerland, criticized the World Trade Organization’s trade liberalization talks, saying that they worked against those who are dying from hunger.

“The line taken by Pascal Lamy (director general of the WTO) is completely against the interests of people dying of hunger because it’s exactly the protectionist taxes that allow farmers to cultivate food crops,” he said.

Ziegler also called for a suspension of biofuels which he said are one of the causes of the sharp increase in food prices.

His call was echoed by international development charity Oxfam which on Monday called for an end to the biofuels mandates in rich countries.

Celine Charveriat, Oxfam International’s deputy advocacy director said: “Biofuels are not only a major cause of increasing prices but are also linked to labor rights abuses and land grabs in developing countries.

“Furthermore, research suggests they may make climate change worse. In this context it is absolute madness to have mandatory targets.”

AFP

  • 0

    adaydream

    More food will be turned to fuel.

    Less food will be available.

    More people will die.

    People who are investing in bio-fuel food and oil have one mind right now. Proffits.

    Until the United States and other countries quit paying subsudies and also allowing the farmers to sell all their crop to bio-fuel manufacturers, who would want to raise food if they can reap both.

    Not only is this going to wing up killing people, the use of all the fertilizer will kill even more of the Mississippi Delta.

  • 0

    rajakumar

    Food affordability woes in poor nations. This problem is due to the nations affected themselves. If china a nation with biggest population in world can escape food woes, why not haiti.

    Why is there food woes there in haiti,its GDP is low with USD 17 billion wealth to shared with 9 million people.

    Why is there no food woes in domican republic the other half of haiti.

    What is the USA/france/other richer nation doing to help out.

    There is enough food for all people in haiti. Who has been feeding them before.

    Who is feeding all the birds,insects and animals in haiti. Are they going hungry in haiti's earth.

    Why is it the human ingenuity to feed themselves insufficient in haiti.

    It is education and motivation of people in haiti that need to empowered with good scientific education and will power to overcome their food woes.

    What is this talk of less food available,this just talk to up prices and incomes.

  • 0

    rajakumar

    Food should not have a crisis especially in countries producing more food.

    More food producing nations and other nations exporting other things need to iron a system for all nations to mutually progress via interdependence in food and other goodies.

    High food producers and other products nations need each other's buying power to prosper.

    Nations need to uproot their border mentality and live in borderless friendly world of abundance in food and other products.

    If nations or people do not change with the times in global trade of food and other products,then they will be left behind.

    Many nations today live in borderless trade world,same for some who are now getting more national.

    It is time for governments to change their educational systems to educate people for the future abundance borderless trade in food and other goodies worldwide.

    The worldwide changes for good must carry on irrespective of borders and nationality.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all