Monday May 28, 2012

U.S. court upholds 'under God' in Pledge of Allegiance

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

  • 0

    adaydream

    Good. Now leave it alone. < :-)

  • 0

    smithinjapan

    Another institution that needs to get with the times. I don't see why a minor change to the Pledge can't be made in order to make it all-inclusive and eliminate religion completely.

  • 0

    Odogma

    I don't see why a minor change to the Pledge can't be made in order to make it all-inclusive and eliminate religion completely.

    You don't know anything about American history - - the vision of its founders in particular, and that is why you can't see.

  • 0

    sensei258

    "the references to God disrespect his religious beliefs" - If he's an atheist, shouldn't it be "his lack of religious beliefs"? When he dies, at the judgment seat, will he still deny the existence of God to His face?

  • 0

    sensei258

    "Separation of church and state" is meant to prevent the government from mandating or prohibiting a specific religion or practice. It does not mean that the government can't mention that God exists.

  • 0

    Odogma

    Obama, in keeping with his plan to consolidate for his corrupt party all the power in America, will just have to invite these judges to DC for his next SOTU speech, and denounce them before the US people like he did the Supreme Court judges.

  • 0

    Triumvere

    Smith,

    Another institution that needs to get with the times. I don't see why a minor change to the Pledge can't be made in order to make it all-inclusive and eliminate religion completely.

    Interestingly enough, the "under God" was not originally part of the Pledge (1892), but rather was added in 1954, marking the fourth time the Pledge has been changed.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all