U.S. general admits Afghan civilians wounded at bomb site
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 1 )
( 6 )
( 9 )
( 6 )
( 2 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
9 Comments
Login to comment
0
smithinjapan
Ah, so some civilians were 'wounded', eh?
0
Darren White
Makes a change from NATO troops being killed by US "friendly fire".
0
lunchmeat
Pure and simple.
0
MeanRingo
Lunchmeat... I suppose you would say the same thing if the US just killed EVERYONE in the area. It would get rid of the insurgents, wouldn't it?
0
MeanRingo
Now, my next question is, would you feel safer then?
0
Suzu1
The stolen tankers could not have been allowed to fall into Taliban hands. They would have been used in attacks on Afghan government or NATO forces. The Germans did the right thing calling in the air strike.
0
rajakumar
US should have pullout out of afghanistan latest by 2016 or earlier,like in Iraq in 2010. The sooner the better.
US/EU soldiers should do their jobs,with 100 percent safety systems.
When there is enough afghan soldiers,to do the job,US/EU must pull out troops.
There is no nuclear weapons in Afghanistan,US/EU army should pull out of afghanistan. EU/US should just give more support to Islamabad administration.
Unneccessary loss of educated US/EU soldiers is not necessary and for what.
Afghanistan and Iraq must get richer and better via their own people unity/united work,the way vietnam did.
0
rajakumar
correction is good- There is no nuclear weapons in afghanistan,US/EU army should pull out from afghanistan.
0
rajakumar
correction- US should pull out of afghanistan ,latest by 2016,like in Iraq in 2010.
Back to top