Monday May 28, 2012

JAPAN NEWS AND DISCUSSION

U.S. gets another month to revive Mideast talks

World Oct. 09, 2010 - 06:08AM JST ( 11 )

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

Order by Time Order by Popularity

11 Comments

0

sabiwabiOct. 09, 2010 - 11:26AM JST

The US should simply cut ALL aid. Israel is nothing but trouble, they ignore international laws and are constantly committing war crimes. Enough is enough!

But I know Obama won't do anything against Israel. If he did, AIPAC would destroy him.
0

djuiceOct. 09, 2010 - 01:13PM JST

The fact is that the Pals are not interested in peace. They will use anything as a pretext to end negotiations. What is the Arab League going to do in 30 Days? US does not answer to the Arab League. The Arabs have threatened to send in their own version of a peace keeping force to enforce whatever it is that they want to enforce, but I think they realize that they might have bitten off more than they can chew. Until the Pals can prove that they are truly interested in peace, there is no point in honoring any of their claims.
0

MisterCreosoteOct. 09, 2010 - 01:30PM JST

There is no such thing as Palestine. Why do we waste out time pretending there is and they want peace?
0

sabiwabiOct. 09, 2010 - 02:09PM JST

There is no such thing as Palestine.

Yeah, the zionist regime has tried very hard to wipe Palestine completely off the map.

Fortunately, most of the world (but not their puppet leaders) realize and recognize that Palestine is still there; it just needs to be liberated.

The Occupied Palestinian Territories belong to the Palestinians, it is part of Palestine. The Israelis have no business being there, and the entire world knows that. The quicker the Israelis move back to the pre-1967 borders, the quicker we can all have peace. The Israeli side is preventing peace by not doing so.
0

elbudamexicanoOct. 09, 2010 - 02:21PM JST

We should make the real power players here, Saudi Arabia etc..help pay for the relocation of these poor Palestinians. The Mideast is a big place, why make so much fuss over some bits of land that will only be contested by both the Jews and Muslims?? Even Egypt has lots of land, it could solve this by taking in all the Palestinians in to Egypt.
0

MisterCreosoteOct. 09, 2010 - 02:24PM JST

Palestinians enjoy their 'oppression' . It's pretty obvious. If they were serious about statehood or whatever fantasy their predominantly lefty allies have for them they would work towards creating the institutions necessary for a 'state.' Since they don't only 2 reasons explain their actions - - they do not want 'peace' and a state of their own, or they are prevented by the surrounding Arab/Mohammedan world from actually becoming anything other than the shock troops the Saudis, Iranians, Egyptians and so forth want in place and in permanent war with Israel.
0

sabiwabiOct. 09, 2010 - 03:15PM JST

We should make the real power players here, Saudi Arabia etc..help pay for the relocation of these poor Palestinians.

The Palestinians do not need to be relocated. They want to live in Palestine, on land that the entire world and the International Court of Justice say belongs to them.

There is no reason for Jews from all over the world to move into racial colonies built on stolen Palestinian land, paid for by American tax payers.
0

MisterCreosoteOct. 09, 2010 - 04:06PM JST

There is no reason for Jews from all over the world to move into racial colonies built on stolen Palestinian land,

Nothing was stolen. And why shouldn't they move back there? Muslims from all over the Ottoman empire moved to or bought up land in "Palestine", at the invitation of Turkish officials. But because the Arab / Mohammedan world by the late 19th century had fallen so far behind the xtian West these things somehow do not qualify as "imperialism," if they are examined at all.
0

sabiwabiOct. 09, 2010 - 09:32PM JST

And why shouldn't they move back there?

You're talking about ancient history, much of which we do not know the details; I am talking about modern international law. Big difference.
0

WilliBOct. 10, 2010 - 01:29AM JST

The "Palestinian" aka muslim Arabs leaders demand that Israel removes all Jews from the West bank -- a completely Jew-free area. And in response to this ethnic cleansing that talk vaguely about "peace".... which is of course a crock. If they really were interested in peace, they would allow the Jews in the West bank to live there without terror threats, the same way that the 15% Arab population in Israel lives as full citizens.

But that is of course nowhere even considered. And not even to mention the idea of reciprocity... e.g. that in exchange for forcibly removing Jews from Arab lands, a corresponding number of muslim Arabs should be asked to leave Israel.

Unsurprisingly, they won´t have any of that.
0

Helter_SkelterOct. 10, 2010 - 04:11AM JST

Arab ministers agreed Friday to give the United States another month

How far the US has fallen when the Arabs are giving them ultimatums. A number one priority for the US should be finding alternatives to fossil fuels. When this happens, the Arab league will become irrelevant.

sabi: The quicker the Israelis move back to the pre-1967 borders, the quicker we can all have peace.

Does anyone actually believe this? Had the Arabs agreed to a "Palestinian" state in 1948 instead of trying to destroy Israel, they would have had this land and more. They gambled and lost, so deal with it.