Monday May 28, 2012

U.S. House passes spy bill

WASHINGTON —

In a late-term triumph for U.S. President George W Bush, the House of Representatives on Friday approved spy-powers legislation that has drawn heavy fire on civil liberties grounds.

Lawmakers voted 293-129 for a bill that may shield telecommunications firms facing massive lawsuits over their work with Bush’s secret, six-year, warrantless wiretapping program, begun after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

The measure now goes to the Senate, where Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid has opposed granting retroactive immunity to companies that cooperated with a program thought to have skirted established surveillance laws.

During often bitter House floor debate, many Democrats broke with the measure, the fruit of months of talks among Senate and House leaders of both parties that ultimately gave in to key White House demands.

“It’s Christmas morning at the White House thanks to this vote,” said Caroline Fredrickson, a top official with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which has fiercely opposed the legislation.

Earlier, Bush had used a hastily announced public statement at the White House to press lawmakers to approve new funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and pushed hard for House passage of the intelligence bill.

“It’s vital that our intelligence community has the ability to learn who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they are planning,” Bush said in the two-minute statement.

The spending bill would provide $162 billion for conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, fueling both for months after Bush’s successor takes over in January, without attaching a withdrawal timetable sought by Iraq war opponents.

But the bitterest feuding was over the intelligence bill, which came amid a pitched political battle raging over Bush’s decision to secretly launch a warrantless wiretapping program believed to have skirted surveillance law.

Critics charge the secret program was illegal because it ran afoul of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)‘s requirement of a court order to spy on U.S. citizens inside the United States.

The White House says Bush, who brought the program under FISA oversight in January 2007, made proper use of wartime presidential powers under the U.S. Constitution, and that the often-updated law was ill-suited to deal with modern telecommunications and the nature of the terrorist threat.

If passed, the new measure could short-circuit about 40 court challenges targeting major U.S. telecommunications firms that cooperated with the program, which the public learned about in a December 2005 New York Times article.

“This is a good bill. It will help our intelligence professionals learn the enemy’s plans for new attacks. It ensures that those companies whose assistance is necessary to protect the country will themselves be protected from liability for past or future cooperation with the government,” said Bush.

Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said he would try to remove the retroactive immunity clause from the Senate version, but warned “given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay.”

“So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program,” he said, adding a vow to “to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives—and the liberty—of the American people.”

The fighting over the surveillance law and the war in Iraq come as the U.S. presidential campaign has heated up—and Bush has adopted a take-no-prisoners approach to belittling his Democratic critics on national security issues.

“The war on terror is the great challenge of our time. And on this vital issue, the Democratic Party has repeatedly shown it would take America down the wrong direction,” he said in a speech Wednesday.

AFP

  • 0

    skipthesong

    Do you now see what is happening?

  • 0

    SezWho2

    What do you think is happening?

  • 0

    adaydream

    Too damn many lobbiest.

    Too much control within the government.

    It's outrageous that these telecommunication companies will get away with this. < :-)

  • 0

    Sarge

    "In a late-term triumph for U.S. Presidentg George W Bush"

    Heh.

    "the ACLU which has fiercely opposed the legislation"

    They would.

  • 0

    SushiSake3

    "the ACLU which has fiercely opposed the legislation"

    sarge - "They would."

    That's because - unlike you - they are proud and patriotic Americans who have their country's best interests at heart.

  • 0

    Sarge

    Sushi - Oh, for cryin' out loud, the ACLU is a bunch of liberals who would ruin this country if they ever came to power.

  • 0

    SushiSake3

    Sarge, sounds like you are almost as scared of the ACLU as you are of The Terrorists :-)

    It also looks like you don't give a toss about the civil liberties of your fellow Americans.

    All in all, it sounds like you wouldn't have much respect for the U.S. Constitution or America.

    Heh, no wonder you are voting for John McCain - he doesn't either. :-)

  • 0

    taikan

    One of the true ironies of the past 50 years is the change in the definitions of "liberal" and "conservative." The very police powers that Sarge (and others who think of themselves as conservatives) support are the same police powers held by the Soviet KGB that were so strongly opposed by Barry Goldwater, William F. Buckley and others who started the "modern" conservative movement. Now, so-called conservatives argue that we should expand the powers of the government to make sure that it can peer into every aspect of our lives. And for what? Simply because of a fear that a few terrorists might do us some harm. Imagine how small the United States would be today if the early settlers had been as afraid of possible danger as Sarge and his ilk seem to be.

  • 0

    RedMeatKoolAid

    "a late-term triumph for U.S. President George W Bush"

    The Dem-controlled House wants McCain to succeed Bush as C-in-C.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all