World Nov. 07, 2008 - 04:28AM JST ( 4 )

BAGHDAD —

The United States and Iraq appeared to be edging closer to a final agreement on the future of U.S. troops in Iraq after Washington said on Thursday it had responded positively to new demands from Baghdad.

The Bush administration has agreed to remove a clause which could have allowed its troops to remain in Iraq after the end of 2011, Iraqi national security adviser Muwaffaq al-Rubaie said on Al-Arabiya television.

“They have accepted this change and the foreign military presence will end at the end of 2011,” he said.

Rubaie said Iraq proposed “110 changes” to American negotiators of the proposed status of forces agreement (SOFA) and “they came today with their responses.”

“They accepted many, many of our requests and rejected some points. We are going to read what they accepted and respond to them,” he said.

In Washington, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said: “We have responded very positively to many of their concerns.”

“There have been some changes that have been made,” so “it’s now up to them to work it through the Iraqi political system,” he said.

A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said “there may be requests for clarifications from the Iraqis but as far as we’re concerned that process of negotiating has come to an end.”

Deputy State Department spokesman Robert Wood added that “there was a letter from President Bush to Prime Minister Maliki with our final text,” but he did not give any details.

Neither Wood nor Whitman would say what specific changes to the draft status of forces agreement were accepted by the U.S. side.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh earlier told state television that Washington had on Thursday replied to demands by Baghdad that some clauses of the pact be amended by making changes of its own.

The Iraqi government would now review these suggestions.

“These modifications now need a meeting with the American side to reach a joint understanding,” Dabbagh said.

“The atmosphere is positive; the Iraqi side needs more time to give the main political entities time to review the proposed U.S. remarks and modifications,” he said.

But according to U.S.-financed Al-Hurra television, the United States has responded only to some of the changes Baghdad wants made. It did not elaborate.

A series of issues has repeatedly delayed the pact that both sides had originally aimed to sign by July 31 this year.

Foremost among the many points of contention in the arrangement was the issue of immunity for U.S. troops and jurisdiction over them.

Washington has already agreed to allow Iraq to prosecute American troops and civilians if they commit a serious crime outside the base when off duty.

But Iraq reportedly also wants to be able prosecute them for crimes committed on their bases.

According to the Baghdad edition of the London-based newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, the United States has agreed to just three of the five latest proposed changes by Iraq.

Quoting unnamed sources, it said Washington has dropped a clause that would have authorized Baghdad and Washington to seek an extension for retaining troops in the cities beyond 2009 and in the country beyond 2011.

The report said Washington has also agreed to allow Iraqis to inspect incoming and outgoing American postal mail, and was also ready to make some changes in the language of the texts.

Both sides must agree on the pact before the U.N. mandate allowing foreign soldiers to operate in Iraq expires on Dec 31, 2008.

A failure to agree on the current draft would raise a new set of thorny problems for both Washington and Baghdad, starting with the need to request a new mandate from the U.N. Security Council.

Wire reports