War crimes court to seek arrest of Sudan president
THE HAGUE —
International Criminal Court prosecutors will seek the arrest of Sudan President Omar al-Beshir for genocide in Darfur, it emerged Friday, prompting Khartoum to warn of a threat to peace efforts.
“I understand that the prosecutor intends to go before a panel of judges to present information and request for a warrant,” U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters in Washington, confirming newspaper reports that Beshir would be targeted.
It would mark the first-ever bid by the ICC, based in The Hague, to charge a sitting head of state.
The Sudanese government, which rejects the court’s jurisdiction and refuses to surrender two war crimes suspects already named, responded angrily to the news.
“If there is a decision about President Beshir, it may destroy the peace process,” state minister for foreign affairs Al-Samani al-Wasila said.
“In this situation, Sudan will never co-operate with the ICC,” he added.
There were fears that it could trigger a military response by Sudanese forces or their proxies against U.N. and African Union peacekeepers.
Sudan’s U.N. ambassador Abdalmahmood Mohamad told CNN Friday that the ICC move was “very serious and all options are open for our reaction.”
When asked by the broadcast network whether the reaction included taking international peacekeepers hostage, the envoy said: “All options are open, I tell you.”
On Tuesday, seven U.N. peacekeepers were killed and 22 were wounded in the ambush of a U.N. convoy in Darfur that some blamed on state-backed militia.
The United States warned Khartoum against any retaliation against peacekeepers saying it was “strongly committed” to international obligations, though not part of the ICC.
“The Sudanese government has obligations under Security Council resolutions as well as the Vienna Convention. The international system expects them to abide by those obligations. Violence serves the purpose of no party,” McCormack said.
China’s U.N. ambassador said such a move would put peace prospects “in jeopardy.”
“I have a lot of concern,” Wang Guangya told reporters when asked about the reports.
Wang said peace in Darfur required “cooperation from all parties” and was based on three pillars: peace talks between Khartoum and the fragmented Darfur insurgency, the joint U.N.-African Union peacekeeping operation and U.N. humanitarian aid to refugees and displaced people.
“This might put the three pillars in jeopardy,” said Wang, whose country is a close ally and energy partner of Sudan.
Chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo’s office announced Thursday that he would unveil a new case on Darfur and name suspects next Monday. It said the case would cover “crimes committed in the whole of Darfur over the last five years”.
But a spokeswoman refused Friday to confirm that a warrant would be sought for Beshir.
“The prosecutor will make his announcement before a judge of the court on Monday, and we will not give details to the press until after,” she said.
The United Nations says up to 300,000 people have died and more than 2.2 million have been displaced since the Darfur conflict broke out in February 2003. The Sudanese government says 10,000 have been killed.
The conflict began when African ethnic minority rebels took up arms against the Arab-dominated regime and state-backed Arab militias, fighting for resources and power.
The U.N. force, UNAMID, is under-staffed and ill-equipped, with only a third of its projected total of 19,500 soldiers and 6,500 police currently deployed.
Advocacy group Human Rights Watch said Beshir’s possible arrest was “very exciting”.
“For us this is what the institution was created for ... the fight against impunity” at the highest level, spokeswoman Geraldine Mattioli told journalists in The Hague.
Wire reports









Order by Time Order by Popularity
14 Comments
Login to comment
0
LIBERTAS
“For us this is what the institution was created for ... the fight against impunity” at the highest level, spokeswoman Geraldine Mattioli told journalists in The Hague. I have another list of candidates for the Court: Bush, Cheney , Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Zacheim, Tenet, Blair, Olmert, Netanyahu, and the guy still on life-support, Arik himself. And acknowledgment of the legitimacy of the court should be irrelevant. Advocacy group Human Rights Watch would say their possible arrest would be “very exciting”. Indeed. Practically the entire world would agree!
0
RepublicofTexas
While Bush has not been a very good president he has not ordered ethnic cleansing and a number of other heinous acts.
However the court will never be able to try him. This will only antagonize Sudan more.
0
skipthesong
Libertas, I noticed all the possible criminals you mentioned. I noticed you are only concerned with 1. those who are not of Islamic nature, 2. those who have gone to war with Muslims. Why not Johnson, Kennedy, Nixon for Vietnam? Trumen for Korea, Regan for Libya, Grandeda, Russia's Gorby for invading Afganistan, China for invading Tibet?
Why do only those who go to war against Muslim get punishment and others don't?
0
SuperLib
I saw a story about this on the news today. Apparently only women go to some areas to get supplies because the men will get killed if they go. And when the women go they get raped. That's their choice...rape or death.
0
LIBERTAS
skipthesong They're almost all dead! By all means add Gorby, but I think it was one of his wooden predecessors (Chernyenko or the other stiff, Andropov) who ordered Afghanistan. Can't remember who was in China when Tibet was invaded, probably Mao. If so, he's dead too! And frankly I don't care a whit what religion the people were who these thugs invaded and killed. It's a crime against humanity, regardless of race, creed, orientation, etc. etc. etc. I'm tired of seeing the shattered, charred bodies of innocents being scraped from walls and pavements, splashed their by thugs of whatever creed, uniformed or not. Ya commit the war crime, ya do the time! Too bad Slobo didn't live to get sentenced. Or Ken Lay of ENRON for that matter! That was a war crime of sorts against ordinary hard working Joes and Josephines too. I have a special lamp post reserved for Cheney, al Duce! I dare say big Mo in Libya deserves to be on this list. As do a half dozen micro-nations we hardly ever hear of too. Not to mention some faction leaders both sides in N. Ireland, the former Yugoslavia and even here in Japan. A few black-van men could do with some scrutiny too.
0
Madverts
Destroy the "peace process"? What "peace process"?
The international war crimes court is a good idea in priniciple, but unless hard power is used to bring these individuals into the courtroom, they doesn't seem to be very useful threats.
0
adaydream
I can't believe that the government of The Sudan has done to these people.
Then we scream and holler about countries that are just flexing their muscles and these people are dieing by the 100s.
Now peace keepers being killed.
The peace keepers should have many many more troops. They shouldn't be allowed to take offensive action, but a force larger than needed to protect the aid workers. < :-)
0
SuperLib
The peace keepers getting killed is absolutely disgusting. If you're just going to sit there and watch them get killed without any response then you may as well drop them in and write "target" on their foreheads. What's the friggen point?
0
DXXJP
Thats what the blue helmets are for. Its been how many years and still nobody has stood up. I guess poor people are further down the list than poor people living on a oil tank.
0
RepublicofTexas
Until nations like China stop supporting Sudan, and the AU steps up pressure the killings are going to continue.
0
reddragonguy
Another foolish attempts by the western world. The ICC has no credibility or repuatations of fair and justices,it was just a place to screw up those leaders of certain countries. Just like the execution of saddam huessein, it was a vengeance instead of a fair trail. The Arabs, the african union ,China and Russia alll backing Bashir and certainly he dont gives a mere care about those accusations. In fact the geinocide of Darfur was a myth, a fabricated charges with political motive and a hidden agenda. It was the west greeding the oil in sudan not in humanitarian issue because they are using the human rights as a political tool to raise up morale standard that theyw ere looks like very noble ! If the ICC deserved to be trusted, then MacNamara, Rumsfled,Cheney these people should eb sending there first! China and Russia will certerianly backing Bashir and he will be OK just like Mugabe!
0
reddragonguy
Those peace keepers were expensedables, do you believe that matters big countries interests because of a few of them got shot?
0
reddragonguy
The Hague.... It is not the time for those Europeans come out to world stage yet. Big brother in Moscow and Beijiang were the one who say yes or No
0
reddragonguy
Who is supporting those African rebels or better known as terrorists? Why those power having interests to support the rebels? For freedom? Nonsenses. Those who against the Sudanese govt were western oil companies who attempted to steal Sudan's oil and those were known as robbery and they deserved to goto ICC for trails. This is fair!
Back to top