White House considers ownership stakes in banks
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
JAPAN NEWS AND DISCUSSION
-
U.N. Security Council blames Syrian gov't for Houla killings
( 4 )
-
U.S. drones kill 5 militants in Pakistan
( 9 )
-
NATO has fight on its hands in Afghanistan - Panetta
( 6 )
-
Iran may rethink 20% enrichment: spokesman
( 0 )
-
Egypt's uprising activists weigh Brotherhood vote
( 0 )
-
- English Instructor (Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe)
- Berlitz Japan, Inc. (ベルリッツ・ジャパン株式会社), Kansai
- Salary: ¥125,000 ~ ¥250,000 / Month
-
- ALT - Mie Prefecture - Yokkaichi City - June start
- NPO法人グローバル教育推進機構（GLAD), Mie
- Salary: ¥230,000 / Month For a full working month. Some months differ.
-
- Business Teaching Positions - Part-time - Kanto Region
- Interac, Tokyo
- Salary: ¥3,000 ~ ¥5,000 / Hour
Order by Time Order by Popularity
28 Comments
Login to comment
0
skipthesong
No. Don't you dare. This is basically one area where government has not taken over in the US.
The US economy over the years proved to be one hell of a money machine for many. Has anyone noticed once they started implementing things like forced loans, have we been going downward? We are going through a rough time; for some its not for a great many it is going to be hard. But that is no reason to turn the entire financial system over to the government.
To analogize , let's say you are married and you and your spouse are having lots of problems do you seek help, get divorced, or try to find some ground to work things out?
On the flip however, "The administration so far has stressed its major goal is to purchase bad loans from financial institutions." is understandable as it was the government that forced banks to give out those loans to begin with.
0
coulrophobic
I hope Carter, Clinton, Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Barack Obama and the Democrats can one day find the moral courage to squarely face and accept blame for what they have done. They will never be able to make it up to the American people but the effort must still be made.
0
smithinjapan
coulrophobic: "I hope Carter, Clinton, Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Barack Obama and the Democrats can one day find the moral courage to squarely face and accept blame for what they have done."
Funny, but those aren't the guys in office that led things to the current crisis, and are the ones considering taking ownership of the bank, but hey, like any of Bush's five remaining fans, you just can't see the forest for the trees. Bush and Co. were 100% for deregulating things and letting them go wild, saying all Americans would get rich from it, and now look what's happened. You made your bed, I just hope you can afford to lie in it.
0
sdmsec
Why shouldn't the U.S. own banks? After all, we can't allow Hugo Chavez to show us up can we?
I'd like to write a suspense-thriller novel about how a U.S. President was secretly injected with DNA from a South American, socialist dictator.
0
smithinjapan
"I'd like to write a suspense-thriller novel about how a U.S. President was secretly injected with DNA from a South American, socialist dictator."
Sadly, your character would still have a heads up on GWB, and be far more capable.
0
coulrophobic
"Bush and Co. were 100% for deregulating things and letting them go wild, saying all Americans would get rich from it, and now look what's happened. You made your bed, I just hope you can afford to lie in it."
Where and when did President Bush say he was 100 percent for deregulation and that all would get rich?
Do you have a source? Is this another hallucination of yours?
0
taniwha
Over in a site called Information Clearing House, there's an article by Adrian Salbuchi, "a prominent author and economic analyst based in Argentina." Apparently he "is part of the Argentine Second Republic Movement", so no, he is not a socialist.
Anyone who is wondering about the likely options the administration could well settle for should give this short article a read. It sets out the three most likely scenarios, and here you need to keep in mind that this is an economist who has worked in a country that suffered at the time one of the most devastating financial crises to hit any single nation.
The title ~~~ 'Get Your Dollars Out Now! FAST!!!'
You can find it here:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20939.htm
0
yabits
LOL!!! Imagine..casting that spell over all Republicans and robbing them of their brains and backbones.
0
yabits
LOL! He might not have mentioned a percentage.
Back in 2002-2003, when Bush began expressing his "strong dollar policy," I started moving a large percentage my dollars to accounts based in euros and CHF. Not since Colonel Klink has there been such a reliable predictor of a major screw up.
0
yabits
smithinjapan,
The only real phobic by these Republican apologists is fear of truth.
0
Sarge
Looks like it's going to be the United Socialist States of America.
0
Betzee
If what you say is true, then the Republicans also owe the American people an apology for allowing the minority party to subvert the system while they were in charge. I can just hear Tom DeLay, "Yep, I should have been watching the shop instead of shaking down K St lobbyists for PAC money."
I would identify Phil Gramm as the individual most responsible for the mortgage industry meltdown. When we last heard from him, a few months ago, he was dismissing critics "as whiners, because Americans never had it so good." Has he stood up and admitted he was wrong? Nope.
0
yabits
Great points, Betzee. If what folks like Sarge claim is actually true, then the Democrats are the first minority party in the history of the world to have so completely bamboozled a ruling party, leading it and the country into such dire economic straits. They must be the most clever party of all time. Just the idea that the Republicans could have stood by and let it all happen just proves that they deserve another four years, according to the logic advanced by the Republican excuse-makers and finger-pointers.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, a growing mass of the American people know better where the blame for this fiasco lies.
0
coulrophobic
"If what you say is true, then the Republicans also owe the American people an apology for allowing the minority party to subvert the system while they were in charge."
The two biggest crises we have faced in years - oil prices and the need for even stopgap measures for the disastrous consequences of affirmative action carried into the housing market and Americans had no vote on either.
Blame goes to the Democrats.
Pelosi and Reid in particular.
Worst.
Congress.
Ever.
0
Good_Jorb
It wasn't to long ago that the current Canada government tried to deregulate the Canadian banking industry and change it into a more American style, along with allowing more American banks into the systems but it failed (How lucky). As it is now, no Canadian banks have failed or have needed Government(tax payers) Welfare checks (considered to be because of conversative regulations the banks deal with), in fact the worst of banks woes have been less than expected profits. But if you don't mind living a corpate welfare state, then if it is not broken then why fix it, should work?
0
adaydream
coulrophobic - It's the deregulation by the republicans that caused this problem, but blame the democrats.
Remember John McCain, the deregulation king? < :-)
0
WilliB
Smithinjapan:
Actually, they are. Find some deeper information than the headlines in the newspapers, and you will find that the root of the current crash is social engineering by the Democrat party, accompanied a generous corruption by various friends.
0
WilliB
adaydream:
Check which president removed the Glass-Steagal act, and who lifted on restrictions on the CRA. It is pretty cynical that the Democrat croonies who created this disaster now blame the other side.
0
adaydream
WilliB - Please enjoy my little links with John McCain touting his deregulation of Wall Street. His tremendous success in giving Wall Street a blank slate to push the United States into a financial tailspin. < :-)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/16/AR2008091603732.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26831372/
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/21/mccain-deregulation/
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/23/mccain.bailout/
0
proxy
Who is up the creek now? I'll give you a hint it starts with a "C" and sounds like "kittycorpse." I've been hearing stories about them being insolvent for 6 months.
0
Betzee
Yabits,
It sounds like you've prudently readied a lifeboat. Sometimes I feel like I'm on the Titanic, after the iceberg has been spotted, and all anybody wants to do is play the blame game not avert disaster (if that's possible).
Republicans would be on much stronger ground to blame Alan Greenspan, as many experts do, for his opposition to regulating credit derivatives. But that requires a knowledge of arcane financial activities. It's obviously much easier to go the Willie Horton route and blame the usual suspects. What a bitter pill it will be for them to swallow when Democrats register increases in Congressional and Senate seats next month, it's really only a question of how many. Presumably John McCain, who wants to be the steady hand on the tiller, will go do with the GOP ship as well.
Earlier this year my nephew, who is now eligible to vote, confided he'd registered as a Republican. We're close and he was concerned about my reaction to the news. But in fact I was happy that the party was gaining someone who isn't angry and ready to cast blame elsewhere.
I counseled the need to win on the basis of ideas, which we've spent a great deal of time discussing over the years, rather than hatch-it job attacks, which derailed John McCain's presidential ambitions back in 2000, as well as ad hominem arguments.
The last I heard he was going to do a write-in for Ron Paul. That's his business but it tells me everything I need to know about what he thinks of the Republican Party platform.
0
yabits
WilliB writes: "Check which president removed the Glass-Steagal act"
The name of the legislation which repealed Glass-Steagall? The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Gramm - Republican Leach - Republican Bliley - Republican
The veto-proof bill which was presented to Bill Clinton was opposed only by a few Democrats, and was a Republican creation.
0
yabits
Betzee writes: "What a bitter pill it will be for them to swallow when Democrats register increases in Congressional and Senate seats next month..."
On CNN's Situation Room this afternoon, on a day when stocks took another serious dive, they showed a McCain campaign in Wisconsin where some of the assembled voters really vented their anger at the thought of Obama doing so well. Thinking of it in a humorous light, it reminded me of Sheriff Bart riding in to Rock Ridge for the first time.
Republican mismanagement made all of this possible. There can be no other explanation.
0
sdmsec
Not too sure about the euro, but CHF and Singapore Dollar together with some US$ is a prudent hedge for your cash. However, I think that paper is being devalued at a rapid pace right now, and I hope you also hedged some in precious metals.
0
SuperLib
Smith, can you provide more information on this? I'm not sure what "were for 100% deregulation" means. You're saying they wanted to remove all current regulations off of the books for the United States?
0
SuperLib
From what I've been reading it looks like taking over some of the banking industry is what's going to happen.
Back to top