BreakingStaind's past comments

• 

  2

  BreakingStaindApr. 06, 2013 - 06:37PM JST

  Voted no. Why? very simple: As the user "333333" said, they haven't enough oil and enough food to feed and moving 4 millions NK soldiers. In addition, their tech level is quiet old compared to US, so NK will be crushed very soon if a war will going to happen.

  Posted in: Do you think North Korea will actually attack South Korea or U.S. bases in Japan or Guam?

• 

  0

  BreakingStaindMar. 31, 2013 - 02:47AM JST

  Honestly is a complete suicide to commence a nuclear war against SK and US. What's the benefit of NK in launching missles against US bases? nothing.

  So, I think that NK seeks attention, and should think twice before starting a kinda sort of nuclear war and they know it very well.

  So, in my opinion I am not worried that much. Of course, we can think about those South Koreans are very scared from North's provocations almost every day... Empty words or not, they think to scare the entire world with those missles...tsk.

  Posted in: N Korea says it has entered 'state of war' with South

• 

  0

  BreakingStaindDec. 23, 2012 - 08:08AM JST

  In my honest opinion, american people should be well-informed about keeping a firearm inside their own houses without harming anyone.

  In exact words: no mag inserted, no bullet already putted inside the gun and completely secured in a place that NONE will know. For the respect of american people because it's not my intention to say anything bad...and most peole don't really care about home security and they prefer to leave a gun in the desk. Just saying.

  In any case, a further and more strict controls over firearms could be a good idea, I think...

  Posted in: From Davy Crockett to Dirty Harry, guns tied to U.S. identity

• 

  1

  BreakingStaindOct. 01, 2012 - 05:06AM JST

  Hope that people in Aichi prefecture are allright. :\ For sure isn't a good thing to experience a bad typhoon like that..

  Posted in: Powerful typhoon hits Aichi; 56,000 evacuated in Nagoya

• 

  -3

  BreakingStaindSep. 29, 2012 - 12:59AM JST

  The fact is that China is greedy and it has too much lands for itself. Japan has almost nothing. Why? Because Japan lost so many lands, included those lands previously achieved from Sino-Japanese war. And at the end of WWII and the fallen of its imperialism, they lost them all.

  Of course, 70% of Japanese mainland are useless, so they can't expanding so much...i think that is legit to take Senkaku Islands, but i'm disappointed about government's sudden move to buy them..but it was necessary..they really need them.

  So guys....don't you think that China has too much power in its hands?

  Posted in: Japan 'stole' our islands, Chinese foreign minister tells U.N.

• 

  1

  BreakingStaindSep. 11, 2012 - 06:27PM JST

  I think that Japan made a dareful move, since because those islands are geographically stationed near Chinese territory. The main interest in Senkaku Islands are only natural resources...and since we learned history of Japan also throught WWII, maybe they are willing to claim islands in many ways. Just thinking.

  I don't know, I think that it's hard to calm down this tension between them...and Japan isn't in a good period to start a war only for a bunch of island. Buying them doesn't solve anything.

  Posted in: China sends 2 patrol boats to disputed islands after Japan buys them