JAPAN NEWS AND DISCUSSION
-
- English Instructor (Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe)
- Berlitz Japan, Inc. (ベルリッツ・ジャパン株式会社), Kansai
- Salary: ¥125,000 ~ ¥250,000 / Month
-
- FT English Teachers for Kids - Osaka
- Kohgakusha Co., Ltd. （株式会社興学社）, Osaka
- Salary: ¥255,000 ~ ¥275,000 / Month Travel Expenses, Encouragement of Japanese learning*
-
- Translator
- ZAIHON, Inc. (日本財務翻訳株式会社), Tokyo
- Salary: ¥6.0M / Year Negotiable
3
Dilbert14
RomeoR,
I think the reason it can be a gateway drug is because it's available at the same place that other hard drugs are available. It's the dealers who suggest, other hard drugs to innocent pot smokers. If it were seperated and legal, noone would decide to try hard drugs.
Furthermore, if pot was legal, drug dealer would be a thing in the past. This is their primary income and without it they wouldn't be able to survive, dealing hard drugs only. Legalization of pot can be the the solution to drug war. Legalization can (and will) bring drug lords and even terrorists to their end.
Posted in: 50% of Americans support legalizing marijuana: poll
3
Dilbert14
Everyone is responsible of their own lives. It's not governments responsibility to have a say about people's mental state. They can regulate and restrict chemical drugs, hard drugs, but not a plant that can be consumed as it is, without going through any chemical process.
Even though I'm for legalization, I wouldn't want to see it being advertised for. Absolutely no advertising should be done. It can even be licenced, only people with licence should grow it, and be responsible for self consumption, not resale.
People are waking up to the fact that it's just an innocent, harmless plant.
Posted in: 50% of Americans support legalizing marijuana: poll
-3
Dilbert14
SHAME on Japan!! Especially in these troubled times, they still insist that this barbaric act should go on. SHAME!!! Japan = Killers of sealife.
Posted in: NZ, Australia condemn Japan's plan to go ahead with whaling
8
Dilbert14
Time to donate to seasheperd. I hope they can be as successfull as last year.
Posted in: Japan to go ahead with whaling despite activist threats
-2
Dilbert14
Here are some highly credible people talking about 911.
http://www.infowars.com/highly-credible-people-question-911/ You official story believers will one day know the real truth.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-3
Dilbert14
Could the reason why, it's completely uninteresting to you be becuase it defies laws of physics? You can't claim to be a scientist and ignore the fact that building would never fall in freefall speeds, unless all internal columns were all severed in synch.
As a matematician, maybe you could help us calculate the possibilities of these many events coming together in one day.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-4
Dilbert14
Because you keep on ignoring them. In the link I posted, it explains how three independant research at all three buildings found traces of thrmite.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-3
Dilbert14
@pawatan,
I think we can go back and forth all day long about this. I think you're not being reasonable at all, suggesting that WTC#7 could fall the way it did. I know it could not have. I know explosives were planted in all three buildings and demolutuion was planned by experts. I know no plane hit pentagon and I know for sure some people had advanced knowldge of the events. I know silversteen bought the buildings couple months prior to the event and I know he doubled his money from insurance afterwards. There's no convincing me as there's no convincing you. You have a faith in system and you would fight to protect it. I on the other hand have no faith in humans, especially ones in power. I know power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. above all, I know they are doing the things thety do because they know most people will believe the official story they come up with and won't question any further. Just know that your ignorance is being counted on by the elites.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-3
Dilbert14
A PhD in physics and former student of physics teacher David Chandler had analysed the twin tower collapse, watch the part of the video here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQAkgKQ7G-U&feature=player_embedded#!
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-2
Dilbert14
A PhD in physics and former student of physics teacher David Chandler had analysed the twin tower collapse, watch the part of the video here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQAkgKQ7G-U&feature=player_embedded#!
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-2
Dilbert14
Exactely as you said, when the supports are destroyed, all at the same time. All internal columns were destroyed at the same time. Rubble was also removed very fast becuase internal columns were cut at a length that would fit on a truck. It's a trademark of a company called "controlled demolutions". Same goes for twin towers.
Yes, I didn't think they were going to land on the next block, surely they fall down. But if it wasn't a controlled demolution, parts of the building would stand, not pulverize like it did.
I also try my best to select videos of dependable unbiassed sources. AEfor911truth is one of the good one. I watch their videos and believe what they say. I don't need to be a structural engineer to realize NIST report is a total farce. What they suggest is impossible and therefore not scientific. I can just believe over 1300 engineers and arhitects when they prove their points.
Governments have agendas, they are the ones in politics, not architects and engineers. Now you think you know more about structural engineering than those 1300 A&E professionals who have built many buildings all around the world. Care to comment to that?
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-1
Dilbert14
pawatan, If you saw the video, you've seen how they compared WTC#7 collapse to other controlled demolutions. How buildings implode into themselves when all internal columns are severed at the same time. Building #7 is doing exactely the same thing, it's coming down really fast and onto itself.
NIST is government controlled and can not be trusted. Their report is unscientific and impossible. They will say what they are told by their bosses. The AEfor911 truth is a movement. These professionals have gathered together to point out the impossibilities surrounding the official report and I believe them 100%. They have no reason to lie, noone to report to, paid by noone, not corrupted by politics and know what they are talkign about.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-1
Dilbert14
Pawatan, If you're comparing the Sampoong building to WTC#7, we're on very different levels. Read this:
"Originally designed as an office building with four floors, it was changed to a large department store during its construction by Lee Joon, the future chairman of the building. This involved cutting away a number of support columns in order to install escalators. When the original contractors refused to carry out these changes, Lee ignored and fired them and hired his own building company for the construction."
Do you still think it's similar to WTC#7?
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-2
Dilbert14
@pawatan,
Sorry, I have nothing more to say to you if you keep ignoring the evidence I presented. This video is made by Architects and Engineers for 911 truth. It shows clearly how WTC#7 came down. It's clear case of controlled demoultion.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
0
Dilbert14
@pawatan, I didn't ignore it, just that I can't explain it as well and detailed as it's explained in this video. If you can spare 15minutes, please watch it.
It is collapsed exactely like it would in controlled demolution. It totally collapsed at one time, watch the video.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-2
Dilbert14
@pawatan, please watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded Everything I want to explain is in this video. As you know, #7 building wasn't the only building around and not the closest to the twin towers. I know it's hard to accept it, it wasn't easy for me either. But uunfortunately, it's the truth.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-3
Dilbert14
@Horsfella, I very well know that it was a controlled demolution. Silversteen admited it by saying "fires were too intense and decision was made to pull it" Let me ask one question. Were you curious enough to do your own research on the subject? Or are you just repeating what you heard on CNN?
@ Hatsoff, I don't know. All I know is buildings don't fall on free fall speeds and get pulverized. WTC#7 is obvious case of controlled demolution.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
0
Dilbert14
@WillB,
I can't believe you gave Windsor building as an example of fires bringing buildings down. It is an example of how steel structures can burn all night but doesn't crumble on themselves. It It burned from top to bottom for 13 hours and it did not fall. Nothing can explain the pulverizing 110 story buildings of WTC after very short and isolated case of fire. except controlled demolution.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
-1
Dilbert14
Why is noone talking about WTC#7? Doesn't anyone know about it? What happened to it? All you official story believers, did you see it coming down? Would you say that fires brought it down? Just know that your ignorance is being counted on by the elite. They know they can do something like this and get away with it becuase most people will believe what TV is telling them.
I would like one of you believers to make comment on WTC#7. Here's my comment: Obvious controlled demolution. ANd of course if that building was brought down in controlled demolution, so were the others.
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?
0
Dilbert14
Of course that brings up the question of why would Al Qaeda drives plane into the buildings they already planted bombs?
Posted in: Ten years on, do you believe al-Qaida was responsible for the events of 9/11?