Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday.
NEW USER REGISTRATION
Letters and numbers only; 5 to 50 characters. This cannot be changed later.
You will be sent an email to activate your account before you can log in.
Yes, I would like to receive news alerts from JapanToday
Nancy FoustMar. 20, 2015 - 10:08PM JST
The article isn't clear about what actually was found. There is no fuel at all in the reactor vessel. No solid or melted fuel. So they ASSUME there is probably fuel in the containment vessel floor. But this is also at this point just speculation. They are going to start looking there next. There is considerable evidence that at least some of the melted fuel ended up in the torus tube and torus room. The torus room is the basement area that has pipe interfaces and other openings into other buildings and the ground. It is not part of the containment systems of the building.
Saying all the fuel is melted is a gross understatement of what was actually found.
If you look at all the reactor research and corium (melted fuel) research, what has happened is almost textbook. The fuel all melted due to lack of cooling, left the reactor vessel and likely all or part left the containment structure.
They will be doing the muon scan at unit 2 next. It could be in worse shape that unit 1.
Posted in: Nearly all fuel in Fukushima No. 1 reactor has melted, says TEPCO
Nancy FoustJul. 28, 2014 - 09:59PM JST
The Fukushima disaster will eventually bankrupt Japan. No sane person would restart a nuclear plant under the natural hazard conditions in Japan.
Posted in: Do you support the restart of nuclear reactors in Japan?
Nancy FoustJan. 12, 2014 - 10:39AM JST
It depends on how they do this. JAEA has done a bunch of destructive testing at their research reactor using a process similar to the one described in some of the news reports. If they are just doing a similar experiment using the equipment they have used in the past it is actually rather low risk. The ones they have done before takes a small 110mm model single fuel rod in a container and gives it a huge pulse of radiation that spikes the temperature. They have done this before. JAEA seems to have done a poor job explaining what they are doing to the press. If they actually have something totally different in mind they need to clearly describe what they are doing. The info given to the press sounds really disturbing the way it was worded.
Posted in: Scientists to create controlled nuclear meltdown in Ibaraki facility
Nancy FoustSep. 15, 2013 - 09:42AM JST
Barrett is yet another opportunistic "consultant" hired by TEPCO who is cheerleading the past and current reckless behavior that has earned TEPCO an international hated reputation.
Barrett has no solutions or ideas and just pushes that same BS that the public must "accept" their fate so TEPCO can keep on being an international menace and not bother investors with any pesky losses.
So far Barrett's solutions are to get some welded tanks and dump everything in the sea. Ultimately taxpayers in Japan are paying for this guy's "expertise". This guy is not some high ranking technical expert, he's a consultant that has been feeding off the US dept of energy consultant trough. Now he is doing the same in Japan. Put him in the same category as the utterly useless Barbara "Mrs. Burns" Judge who did the same thing. Showed up and went to work trying to BS people rather than actually providing solutions.
Disband TEPCO, let the banks take their lumps for investing in them. Turn the disaster site over to the NRA and keep all the reactors turned off. Time for Japan's govt. to grow up and start acting like adults.
Posted in: Japan must release Fukushima water into sea: U.S. adviser
Nancy FoustJul. 25, 2013 - 08:12AM JST
So who buys all this real estate? The government in order to put on the games? If the government is buying it then it is the taxpayers who are actually buying it. So the real estate gamblers want the taxpayers to buy their properties during a down market. How nice.
Posted in: Real estate markets will boom if Tokyo wins 2020 Olympics: Toyota exec
Nancy FoustJul. 05, 2013 - 10:22PM JST
This is just a TEPCO PR stunt. They hired Judge last year along with some other western nuke industry people to rehab TEPCO's image.. She is there to BS people, not change anything. She also has zero experience in nuclear engineering or anything really related to nuclear safety. She had a brief stint on one of the UK nuclear agency committees. Her appointment was heavily criticized because she had no experience at all to be on that board.
Previous comments about Judge and her earlier hire by TEPCO was that they thought she could convince women that TEPCO was now OK. That too is an old nuclear industry PR tactic. To try to use women to convince the demographic almost always against nuclear power, women. The US and UK do this heavily in their marketing and PR.
Posted in: TEPCO hires nuclear safety advocate
Nancy FoustJun. 27, 2013 - 09:56PM JST
The US first choice for dealing with their plutonium was to vitrify it (put it in melted glass) so it is impossible to retrieve. MOX was pushed by Russia to the US as part of arms talks. Yet the US turns around and pushes Japan to use MOX rather than the US first choice of vitrification to deal with proliferation issues. In many ways Japan is the US's lab rat for nuclear technology. Monju, MOX and Rokkasho are three projects that the US will never do domestically because the costs, pollution and risks show they are a clear waste of money. Yet the US state dept is pressuring Japan to continue things the US won't do and won't even put vitrification on the table.
Posted in: Japan gets first MOX nuclear shipment since 3/11 disaster
Nancy FoustJun. 23, 2013 - 06:39AM JST
A more accurate statement (or question) would be at what point does iodine 131 exposure (and other similar isotopes) begin to cause cancers? Do they really know for sure?
The 1990's research on Chernobyl really didn't know even some basic answers and I doubt they got all the answers out of Chernobyl in the last 10 or so years.
Throwing a gallon of water at someone gets them wet. Throwing 10 gallons of water at them gets them wet also but at some point between 1 and 10 you may not really be more "wet". The excessive exposures at Chernobyl at some point may have been over and above what is needed to create thyroid damage. So taking the huge exposures at Chernobyl and trying to go backwards to Fukushima's exposure doses that are in many cases not accurately recorded may not be an accurate measurement.
Posted in: The radioiodine exposure levels at Fukushima were only a tiny, tiny fraction of those at Chernobyl, which were very significant. Therefore, there just wasn't enough exposure at Fukushima to get thyroid cancers, and no other cancers can be expected, based on the Chernobyl experience.
Nancy FoustJun. 22, 2013 - 10:52AM JST
Can they make Sprint's coverage in the US Midwest not suck? If they can do that and charge somewhere less than the highway robbery Verizon is charging they could potentially make a decent go in the US.
Posted in: SoftBank chief aims to create world's No.1 company
Nancy FoustJun. 01, 2013 - 09:30AM JST
Just because something has a fancy title and make lots of proclamations doesn't mean it is a) accurate or b) worth the paper printed on.
UNSCEAR is part of the over all IAEA mess and has a long track record of downplaying nuclear problems.
What you want to ask is what data was used and does it realistically reflect the reality. How did they then use that data to make assumptions.
If the data itself was fairly useless or known to be inaccurate that ruins the whole thing. Using iodine scans done weeks after the disaster as someone's total iodine exposure is bogus. Iodine 131 has a 16 day half life. People who were tested were tested far too late. Unless you adjust and attempt to back track to what their exposure at the time was, using that late in the game reading is misleading.
One I saw mentioned in another article about this report cited workers would not see health impacts from their THYROID exposure to i-131 SOON. Never mind most of the workers didn't get the bulk of their exposures by inhaling iodine 131. Even thyroid exposure has some latency so they focus on one thing that turns out the way they want it and ignore the real problem like the number of workers with well over 100 mSv exposures from their work. Saying they will all have no problems at all would be foolish, inaccurate and that is why UNSCEAR avoids saying anything about it and focuses on something that was mostly irrelevant.
This is all a PR game for the nuke industry who wants everyone to forget what happened. They have a rug to sweep this all under and you pesky people are getting in the way of their nuke Renaissance
Posted in: No rise in cancer seen from Fukushima nuclear disaster: U.N.
Nancy FoustMay. 27, 2013 - 09:50AM JST
Do these politicians have any idea how all of this reflects on Japan elsewhere? Hashimoto's week long misogynistic tirades & denying war crimes? Abe outright advocating taking away individual rights considered normal in most of the world. Undo-ing the constitution looks more like chomping at the bit to go to war than trying to modernize the WWII laws. I thought his desire to restart reactors was bad. WTF....
Posted in: The deeper agenda behind Abenomics - constitutional change
Nancy FoustApr. 21, 2013 - 01:45PM JST
Dropping the bomb was about dick waving at the USSR, not about ending the war with Japan. This needs to be seen for what it really was. Even back in the 1980's they were still using the "to end the war" excuse in history class. The US tried very hard to prevent images of what was done to Hiroshima and Nagasaki from making it into the media. People SHOULD be appalled.
Greg Mitchell has a great series on the issue of dropping the bombs and the play by play of events that prove this wasn't about ending the war. Why the airshow thought this was ok in the first place is stupid on their part.
Posted in: Hiroshima A-bomb re-enactment dropped from U.S. air show
Nancy FoustApr. 01, 2013 - 09:12PM JST
"Reliable experts have said that there is no radiation problem that the level of radiation present is less that what is normally found in most parts of the USA."
"Reliable experts have said that there is no radiation problem that the level of radiation present is less that what is normally found in most parts of the USA."
Maybe the parts of the USA at the Hanford nuclear site or the Nevada test site? No, the levels in the evac zone are far higher than places in the US. Your "experts" are not reliable...
Posted in: No-go zone designation lifted for part of Namie town
Nancy FoustMar. 16, 2013 - 09:58AM JST
A couple of things that matter greatly not mentioned enough in the media. TEPCO and GoJ lied to the US about radiation levels. The US wasn't actively monitoring things until around the 16th. Then the govt agencies went into panic mode. There is proof of this in the NRC FOIA documents.
After the 16th when the Reagan realized levels were way higher than TEPCO or GoJ was telling US officials the US had DOE monitoring on the ground and took more action. I fully expect to eventually see action against the US military for what went on. There was clearly not enough precaution taken on the ship and none of the enlisted got iodine.
It isn't just the air doses. Some had more concentrated exposures due to handling filters, contaminated gear etc. If you can find the actual video of the press conference it makes all of this make more sense.
Posted in: 126 U.S. military members to sue TEPCO
Nancy FoustMar. 02, 2013 - 09:45AM JST
I would not put much stock in the WHO being impartial or honest either. They are beholden to the IAEA by UN mandate. So the guys who promote nuclear power on an international level have the ability to edit what WHO says and does.
Posted in: Japan riled by WHO's Fukushima cancer warning
Nancy FoustMar. 02, 2013 - 09:40AM JST
I actually read the report. They didn't include readings from inside the 20km zone. They eliminated them from the calculations. This is directly out of the report on exposures used to create the cancer prediction models: "Doses within a 20-km radius around Fukushima Daiichi NPP were not assessed in the WHO preliminary dose estimation and therefore this geographical area is not included in this HRA. "
The WHO exposure doses are totally generic. They used environmental readings and general food testing data from the government to create these generic exposures. The WHO work does not reflect what happened to real people.
So one person might get a slight over estimation, then the one who actually did end up exposed gets an unrealistically low estimation. the fact that the 20km zone is removed from all of this makes it worthless.
Nancy FoustFeb. 21, 2013 - 09:24AM JST
US grocery prices have gone up to about double what they were around 2006. We also have more and more problems with contaminated foods (e coli, lysteria, salmonella) and the general quality of many products has gone down to increase profits. About 70% or more of the food in the typical grocery store is produced by a handful of big agriculture/food conglomerates that own most of the major food brands. Be careful what you ask for. That corporate food supply will only be cheap until they are entrenched and then it will become expensive again.
Posted in: U.S. says Japan must negotiate on rice to join TPP talks
Nancy FoustFeb. 18, 2013 - 01:27PM JST
Basroil wrote this: "2) They only included nodules over 5mm in the initial report back in 2001, all others were disregarded. The Fukushima data shows just 0.5% of cases with nodules over 5mm, not the ridiculous 30% everyone complains about. That's a whole 60x smaller result."
You fail at reading both the actual testing results and every media outlet that has reported on it. The thyroid nodule rates are up into the 40% range.. unless you area accusing all of the newspapers in Japan to be spreading rumors...
Posted in: No ill health effects seen in residents near Fukushima plant yet: researcher
Nancy FoustFeb. 18, 2013 - 01:25PM JST
It has only been two years. Cancers have a varied latency period.
There are a number of locals that were exposed that have cited various medical problems they cite as being from radiation exposure. There is no formal study underway to document or verify these. That doesn't mean they are not happening.
The health survey has botched a number of the methodologies used in the estimates for exposure. So now various experts have complained that the health survey declaration of "no harm" may be wildly inaccurate. Meanwhile the GoJ and WHO have declared the entire thing a non issue.
The reality is the only official surveys are an unreliable mess and it is pretty sure based on what various experts have put forth as actual evidence that exposures differ from the govt. numbers. Exposures seem to vary widely in who got how much of what based on many factors.
Of course the powers that be want to make all of this a non-issue so they can restart reactors and get back to business as usual. Leading up to the 2nd anniversary this has kicked into high gear with various shills in the US and Japan suddenly declaring everything is peachy.
Nancy FoustJan. 20, 2013 - 01:43PM JST
5 people were also shot at gun shows in the US today. These people don't represent the wider array of views on the issue that constitutes the majority of people in the US. Reporting like this just encourages the view outside the US that the entire place is full of dumb rednecks.
Posted in: Thousands rally against stricter gun control in U.S.
May. 30, 2015 - 01:19PM JST
She is on the phone. That is illegal. So is riding holding an umbrella by the…
Posted in: Multitasker
May. 30, 2015 - 01:13PM JST
China is probably betting that they can establish some physical control before the group of nations…
Posted in: Chinese weaponry spotted on artificial island, U.S. says
May. 30, 2015 - 01:12PM JST
'Of course you don't. America is not the peace loving nation it keeps being touted as.…
May. 30, 2015 - 01:08PM JST
There are three ongoing cases, two by staff and one by members.
Posted in: Discord erupts at FCCJ over news agency accreditation
May. 30, 2015 - 01:04PM JST
I love Android, but I hate how it's usually deployed. Many problems that people report about…
Posted in: Google unveils Android's latest technological tricks