Thursday February 16, 2012

OssanAmerica's past comments

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    cleoFeb. 15, 2012 - 09:00AM JST Are you telling us the harpoonists have no proper professional training, only what they learned at their daddies' >knees? And their daddies before them? No wonder you're so forgiving of the abysmal time-to-death-rates in the >whaling industry.

    And are YOU telling us that they went to a Harpoonists Academy and got their certification papers? Hate to break this to you but yes, for the most part, maritime and fisheries occupations vare very much handed down in families. Even in England and Scotland. The time-to-death-rate is a non-issue. Unless of course the entire basis of your position is merely emotional.

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    That's not correct. They are constantly reviewing whale stocks and the possibility of resuming commercial whaling - >they have just decided against it at this point. Partly due, as you probably know, to the fact that the science of several >countries has been rejected as being too flimsy. ('Hey...where are the samples we took? You didn't EAT them, did >you?')

    That's totally incorrect. The 1986 Moratorium was subject to review and reassesement in 1990.
    In 1991 the IWC Scientific Committee suibmitted it's findings to the commission that under the RMP, that 2000 Minkes could be harvested per year as the population had risen to 873,000 worldwide (761,000 in Antarctic waters). The anti-whaling faction vote to continue the Moratorium. The Moratorium itself is in contradiction to the IWC's charter and CAnada even left the IWC because of it.

    ('Hey...where are the samples we took? You didn't EAT them, did >you?')

    This "would" be funny if IWC Article VIII didn't REQUIRE that whales taken under Scientific Permits be CONSUMED. That means "eaten", if you're not clear,

    Funny how the anti-whaling perspective is labelled 'emotive' and 'hippy' when pro-whalers pull out gold nuggets like >this. This is true in ALL ex-whaling countries, including my own. The last town to lower the whaling flag in my >country bemoaned the 'death of a town' in 1978 - it's livelihood, traditions, culture. Now, 34 years later, it is a thriving, >prosperous town that is recognised as one of the best places in the state to live and has the best eco-tourism >industry in the state, largely based on....the whales that inhabit surrounding waters.

    How YOUR country Australia has handled the end of whaling is irrelevant. Australia never had a practice of whaling for food, they merely killed every whale, mother whale and calf they could find, skin it onboard to boil the blubber, and toss the tons of wasted flesh overboard to feed the White Pointers.

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -2

    OssanAmerica

    What originality comes out of China? everything is copied..

    Everything in the world was originally invented in China. 5000 years ago. The rest of the world is just copying Chinese products. Just like China has owned all of Asia for thousands of years.

    Posted in: Chinese city seizes Apple iPads in name dispute

  • -1

    OssanAmerica

    An act of children. The rightists of Japan, another group of children, are green with envy that China has such a rule.

    The world's biggest authoritarian dictatorship with the biggest population and second biggest economy with an expantionist military agenda stepping on the toes of all it's Asian neighbors conducting military traning with the United States as the desgniated enemy....and you're worried about a miniscule bunch of losers in black trucks annoying the hell out of everyone? One word.."perspective".

    Posted in: China tightens limits on imported shows on TV

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    Yes the Judge threw out this stupid complaint.

    Posted in: California court to decide if SeaWorld whales are illegal 'slaves'

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    cleoFeb. 15, 2012 - 02:37AM JST "Whether an industry is "dead" or not depends entirely on economic factors, The UK, US et al. did not stop commercial whaling (AFTER they decimated the global population) because some people got emotiomally bent out of shape over whales". When an industry is shut down whatever the reason, it's ipso facto dead. The moratorium means there can be no >legitimate commercial market for whalemeat; economically it's dead. It's only our taxes and lies about 'research' >that keep it afloat.

    Not true at all. Firstly, "moratorium: means a TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF ACTIVITY. In fact the IWC 1986 Moratorium was suppose to have been reviewed but has not due to the biased actions of the anti-whaling faction in the IWC. SEcoindly, the 1986 IWC Moratorium makes no reference whatsoever as to whether a legitimate commercial market for whalemewat may or may not exist. In fact, IWC Aricle VIII REQUIRES that whales taken under Scientific Permits be CONSUMED. I repeat, an industry does not shut down because a bunch of aged hippies want to play eco-terrorits, or a large crowd of uneducated weakminded souls believe that whales are somehow any more "magnificent" than cows.

    "Training as a mariner has a wide range of employment possibiltites"

    We're not talking about training as a mariner. We're talking about training as a whaler. DS wanted SS to >provide 'education/training programmes for whalers so that they can make a living'. It seems you agree with me, for >different reasons, that there is no need for any such training, and certainly no need for SS to provide it.

    Training as a whaler, short of personally manning a harpoon, is not as distinct an occupation from other fisheries occupations as you seek to think. In fact even my argument is debatable if you consider Mediterranean swordfishermen. The Whalers are currently making a a perfectly legal (in Japan and other whaling nations) living and again, only economic reasons will change that. That you don't like what they are doing on an emotional level is utterly irrelevant.

    "Your uneducated and insulting comments about the mariners is offensive"

    I've made no comments about 'mariners'. My comments were about people who are stupid enough to train for >professions and industries that no longer exist.

    Many peopke in the fisheries field, not just in Japan but the world over, learn their craft from their fathers who learned from theirs. Entire villages are often based on a tradition handed down over centuries, Nobody is going out and training for professions that "no longer exist". You are the one trying to make a profession that has existed for centuries, cease to exist because you "Don;t Like It"..

    "I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about you"

    I thought we were talking about the FBI and how good they are at defining terrorists (not very). The FBI has done a good job of defining terrorists as we have had no succesful attacks on US soil since 911. Furthermlore, the US Courts have had no problem with the FBI's definition of Eco-Terrorists either as evidenced by their succesful prosecuition of ALF.

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    "Have you ever tried clenching your buttocks while running, bare or not?"

    I wonder if it was really clenched. And not inserted.

    Posted in: Australian man fined for mooning Queen Elizabeth

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    cleoFeb. 14, 2012 - 12:31PM JST

    "I would hardl;y consider anyone simply working a high risk job to make a living a feed their family to be "dumb".

    Training to work in a dead industry is dumb. Or do you also admire people who demand public subsidies to work >as chariot grease jockeys, entrail readers and henge builders? That it's high-risk as well as dead-end only makes >them dumber.

    Whether an industry is "dead" or not depends entirely on economic factors, The UK, US et al. did not stop commercial whaling (AFTER they decimated the global population) because some people got emotiomally bent out of shape over whales. Petroleum simply replaced whale oil. Training as a mariner has a wide range of employment possibiltites and has been and will continue to be with us for a very long time. All maritime occupations are high risk whether they be fisheries, energy production, transportation or even leisure. Your uneducated and insulting comments about the mariners is offensive and uncalled for. References to presently nonexisting occupations are utterly irrelevant.

    "Good why don' you try that line of defense next time you find yourself on the derfendants side opf acriminal charge."

    And what criminal charge was thrown at Cat Stevens or John Lennon? Pacifism? Peace-lovin' song lyrics? (Never >been on the defendant's side of any criminal charge, but if the charge is being anti-war and/or anti-mindless cruelty, >I plead guilty.)

    I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about you, how far would YOU get with such a defense argument. Hope for your sake you never do. (end up as a defendant)

    "the FBI are not a joke."

    "The FBI as an organisation is not a joke. With the weight of the US government behind it, it can do a lot of damage >and upset people's lives. It's 'definitions' of what makes a terrorist (♪give peace a chaaance~♫) are a joke.

    The FBI's position towards John Lennon is also irrelvant to their position on eco-terrorists. Eco-terrorism is a real crime which is actually prosecuted. Would you disagree with the FBI's definition of "serial murderer" and "kidnapper" because you disagree with their views on John Lennon?

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -4

    OssanAmerica

    cleoFeb. 14, 2012 - 08:42AM JST The 'hunt' aka commercial whaling has been no-go for over a quarter of a century. Whalers who after all this time >still haven't realised they're in a dead industry, and especially those who trained after 1986, are probably far too >dumb to be trained for anything else.

    I would hardl;y consider anyone simply working a high risk job to make a living a feed their family to be "dumb". At least nowhere near as much as people who who value animal life more than human.

    "have you ever been detained at any international airport because you disagreed with the definitions being used by the local immigration and law enforcement authorrties?"

    \Lotts of people have, including Cat Stevens.

    And did they ever win? Good why don' you try that line of defense next time you find yourself on the defendants side of a criminal charge and see how far that gets you..

    FBI (the people who hounded John Lennon for being 'anti-war', remember) definitions are a joke.

    No the FBI are not a joke. Most law enforcement agencies on a national level are not a joke. Most of us outgrew this kind of attitude.

    Good why don' you try that line of defense next time you find yourself on the derfendants side opf acriminal charge.

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • 12

    OssanAmerica

    So according to China, Proview China is not bound by a 2009 agreement under which Proview Taipei sold theipad trademark to Apple 2009. So how can China continue claiming that Taiwan is a "part" of China? No country loves to mix politics with business like China. Let the world be forewarned.

    Posted in: Chinese city seizes Apple iPads in name dispute

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    StopKillingWhalesAndDolphinsFeb. 13, 2012 - 07:32AM JST Killing whales is not civilised, neither is throwing butyric acid. Both sides are wrong but Japan will have to stop >killing whales before this shameful misery will

    I think you are very wrong. Killing whales is no more or less civilized gthan killing any other animal. And Japan, will stop only if an agreement is reached at the IWC. The efforts by the IWC to accomplish this were desoroyed by Australia's unwillingness to negotiate, something that the United States and New Zealand were willing to do. Publicity ahd oney seeking eco-terrorists acts of violence simply harden Japan's position and work against the efforts of organizations like Greenpeace.

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    japan_cynicFeb. 13, 2012 - 10:23AM JST OssanAmerica, you can call a duck a pig if you want, it's still a duck. The FBI can try to redefine any word it wants for >political purposes, but it doesn't make it right, or acceptable to me. Have you read any Orwell?

    Have you ever been detained at any international airport because you disagreed with the definitions being used by the local immigration and law enforcement authorrties?

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    smithinjapanFeb. 13, 2012 - 02:27PM JST Sorry, my friend, but pointing out the fact that under your FBI definition the whalers could also be deemed 'eco->terrorists' is not 'irrelevant' any more than your saying they are eco-terrorists is irrelevant. We all know the >terms 'terrorist' and 'eco-terrorist' have been used and abused to the point that some governments will simply label >anyone who disagrees with them as such. Same with how GWB destroyed the meaning of the words 'democracy' >and 'freedom'.

    Sorryn my friend but I can not ber held responsible for anyone's lacl of education, reading comprehension or direct experiemnce with law enforcement agencies and judicial systems. Your comment that the Federal Bureau of Investigation'sa definition of eco-terrrism is "irrelevant" takes the cake.

    As to the pic of the day, I love the euphemism employed here: "In this photo released by the Institute of Cetacean >Research of Japan, a Sea Shepherd activist aboard a small boat throws a butyric acid-containing glass bottle..." A much better explanation of the pic would be: "Pro-whalers release a picture of SS throwing some rotten butter". >But hey, gotta put some lip-stick on that pig, eh?

    Going back to education, the facts that the eco-terrorists are throwing "butyric acid in a glass bottle" and "butryric acid is found IN ROTTEN BUTTER" does not equal "Butric acid is rotten butter".

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    DisillusionedFeb. 13, 2012 - 11:18AM JST OssanAmerica - "The FBI defines eco-terrorism as the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature >against innocent victims or property by an environmentally-oriented, subnational group for environmental-political >reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature."> Are the Japanese whalers innocent victims? Really?

    Yes really, I'm afraid they are, as much as the anti-whaling crowd would like to believe otherwise. It is clear that they are conducting research whaling as sanctioned by Article VIII of the IWC Regulations, which permits them to take whales in "sanctuaries" and REQUIRES them to to consume the whales taken. It is also clear that the waters where they are conducting acvtivities are NOT AUSTRALIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS, iotherwise theywould have been stopped and escported out years ago. If you want to substantiate your position that they "are not innocent" you will, like everyone else, have to wait for the outcome of Australia's ICJ action. Until then, the whalers are most certainly "innocent" of breaking any agreements, treaties or laws, Hence, Sea Shephers are eco-terrorists.,

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • -6

    OssanAmerica

    tkoind2Feb. 13, 2012 - 09:28AM JST It is incomprehensible that an educated person with knowledge of the English language could rationalize the use of >the word "terrorist" when talking about anyone on either side of this conflict. Words like "protester", "activist" or >even "criminal" could be easily applied, and yet the word "terrorist" is trotted out with foolish zeal.

    The term "terrorist" as in "blow up an airplane" and "eco-terrorist" are two completely different things. The contuinuous posting of "no they aren'nt terrorits" arguments is both irrelevant and misguided.

    "The FBI defines eco-terrorism as the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against innocent victims or property by an environmentally-oriented, subnational group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature."

    "Since 1977, when disaffected members of the ecological preservation group Greenpeace formed the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and attacked commercial fishing operations by cutting drift nets, acts of "eco-terrorism" have occurred around the globe. "

    http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/the-threat-of-eco-terrorism

    Posted in: Confrontation

  • 1

    OssanAmerica

    I cant stop laughing. This is an example of how "some" Conservation groups have corrupted what is basically a noble cause into a PR show. Are the contributiors to PETA aware of how many attorney hours were paid for to contsruct and file this absurd "suit"? A suit that wil l will become a dictonary example of the world frivolous.

    Posted in: Judge throws out whale 'slavery' suit against Seaworld in California

  • -3

    OssanAmerica

    Now that I have stopped laughing, I hope every contributor to Ingrid's money making cult appreciates how their well intended funds are wasted on silly publicity stuints like this. Animal do not have "rights". Since the animals themselves have no rights you can't bring an action on behalf of one. At least not seriously. As soon as the Orcas submit ther affidavits and appear in court to present their swoen testimony I;ll eat my words. As flor the nutbags who think this is somehow sane I am tempted to entice PETA to bring an abuse charge against dog owers who refuse to let their pets eat meat.

    Posted in: California court to decide if SeaWorld whales are illegal 'slaves'

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    This is pretty normal unless he was a repeat offender.

    Posted in: Chinese skipper gets suspended term for illegal fishing

  • 1

    OssanAmerica

    No, but there's rule that says Arson is illegal. In Japan, South Korea and China and everywhere else on this planet.

    Posted in: Chinese man charged with arson attack on Japan's embassy in Seoul

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    Japan has twice tried to settle this dispute at the ICJ. South Korea has refused twice. Yet they get bent out of shape over issues like this. If they acted like adults and settled it in court they wouldn't have to get bent out of shape.

    Posted in: S Korea blasts Gemba for remarks on disputed isles

Follow us

View all

  • English Instructor (Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe)

    English Instructor (Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe)
    Berlitz Japan, Inc. (ベルリッツ・ジャパン株式会社), Kansai
    Salary: ¥125,000 ~ ¥250,000 / Month
  • FT English Teachers for Kids - Osaka

    FT English Teachers for Kids - Osaka
    Kohgakusha Co., Ltd. (株式会社興学社), Osaka
    Salary: ¥255,000 ~ ¥275,000 / Month Travel Expenses, Encouragement of Japanese learning*
  • Translator

    Translator
    ZAIHON, Inc. (日本財務翻訳株式会社), Tokyo
    Salary: ¥6.0M / Year Negotiable