Wednesday February 15, 2012

OssanAmerica's past comments

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    sfjp330, If China weren't so overboard with nationalism the rest of Asia including Japan wouldn't have to be. China wrote the book in using nationalism to direct the people's concerns away from the government so it;s pretty funny that you accuse Japan of it. China bashing is a winning formula not just in Japan but all of Asia and even the United States because of China's territorial and miliytary expansionist agenda. And Japan has always expressed interest in Tariwan's defense for decades, after all a China-controlled Tasiwan would vut off the oil supply to Japan, anmd Japan has always been aligned with the United States on the issue of North Korea. Japan actually served cobertl;y inn the Korean W#ar under US supervision when the Chinese were killing Americans and other UN troops. China would never start a real conflict with Japan because that would cause the US-Japan Mutual Defense Treaty to kick in and China would be be starting a war with the United States. Only North Korra would side with China, as there is zero chancxe of South Korea and Taiwan siding with China as they both see it as a threat. But you are right, the Senkakus are calm because China doesn't dare start a shotting war with the U.S.

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • -1

    OssanAmerica

    And fueling China's nationalism feeds their territorial anmd miltary expansionisty agenda that has made trhem a threat to all of Asia. Yes, good thinking there. As long as China re,mains an authoritarian one party dictatorship that censors and controls what it's people make produce and watch, they need no help at all from anyone else.

    Posted in: Christian Bale denies Nanjing Massacre film is propaganda

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    BurakuminDesDec. 15, 2011 - 10:48PM JST "gosh that was a long long time ago, world war 2, already erased in history, face the fact now its new era.... nonsence korea nonsence." Are you prepared to go down to Hiroshima and Nagasaki next August and tell the locals the same thing? "It's a long >time ago WW2, people, get over it, it's erased from history...". Try it and see what reception you get! LOL

    I don't what you're LOLing about because I've been to both Hiroshima andNagasaki in August and while there is indeed considerable "war is evil" and "no nukes" sentiment, I have never ever seen any anti-American sentiment.

    Posted in: Former sex slaves hold 1,000th protest outside Japan's embassy in Seoul

  • 3

    OssanAmerica

    The Whalers also have mountains of video footage showing the SS conducting acts of violence. The Complaint filed in the Fedral Court refers specifically to them as evidence of their actons. As for the Whalers' "denying" anything, what is there to deny? They are only there to chase he whales. SS are the ones who are there to interefere with their operations. Waston is a weidely recognized liar, video taping the whalers testing fire extinguishers and calling it tear gas, and claiming to have been shot but somehow the bullet didn't kill him. This kind of childish nonsense isn't going to fly in a court of law because once credibility is questioned it will prejudice SS' own position.

    Posted in: Japan whaling authorities sue Sea Shepherd in U.S.

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    just-a-guyDec. 15, 2011 - 12:45PM JST If japan dared to drill the seabed without Chinese goverbment'a approval, the 'W88' will be sent like a christmas gift!

    I am sure they would appreciate receiving a watch phone very much. Merry Christmas. http://www.chinatronic.com/products.php/W88

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    bam_booDec. 15, 2011 - 11:25AM JST The Senkakus were never part of Taiwan. Furthermore they were never taken from China (Qing/Ching) by force as >they were Terra Nullius when Japan followed proper Internationally accepted procedure to incorpoirate them in >early 1884. "OssanAmerica, were do you get your data from? According to wikipedia the island were not taken by Japan until 1895, because Japanese diplomats were afraid to arouse Chinese anger, thus implicitly admitting that they knew China had knowledge of and interest in the Islands"

    My mistake, the Senkakus were incorporated into Japan as Terra Nullius in January of 1885. The Treaty of Shimonoseki and the hadover by Ching to Japan of territories did npt take place until April of 1885. The Senkakus were not included in them because Ching did not consider them to be their to start with and they were not taken as part of the Sino-Japanese War. Arouse Chinese anger? Nobody, not the US, England or Japan cared about the "anger" of the sick man of Asia at the time.

    "Japan claims the islands as official Japanese territory in 1895. From 1885 on, surveys of the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly made by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the Senkaku Islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China. Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the Senkaku Islands into the territory of Japan. Since then, the Senkaku Islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Nansei Shoto Islands which are the territory of Japan. These islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands which were ceded to Japan from the Qing Dynasty of China in accordance with Article II of the Treaty of Shimonoseki which came into effect in May of 1895. Accordingly, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty"

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/senkaku.htm

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    sfjp330Dec. 15, 2011 - 10:26AM JST OssanAmericaDec. 15, 2011 - 09:59AM JST. You are confusing the issue of the Senkaku Islands with the entire East >China Sea. "Really? The Senkaku Island is important for strategic and political reasons, as claims of ownership are used to bolster claims to the wider surrounding sea areas and its resources."

    Yes really. Japan is not "sharing" exploration rights on the islands. They are doing so with China in seabed areas where the borders are next to each other.

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    Looking for a fighter to come online in 2016 justifies a stop gap measure anyway. The F18 would be the ideal choice as an interim replacement for the aging Phantoms.

    Posted in: More headaches with F-35; Japan delays announcement

  • -1

    OssanAmerica

    SwissToniDec. 15, 2011 - 06:07PM JST Ossanamerica, 'The closest Japan came to ceasing it's completely legal research whaling was when the IWC >offered a compromise in 2010 to break the gridlock' "Yes, by offering a commercial catch quota. Japan was full on for the idea and insisted on inclusion of a Southern Ocean catch. That certainly adds credence to the argument that Japan is currently only whaling for research purposes."

    It was offered by the IWC and included a reduction in catch numbers over time. The only thing this proves is that Japan was willing to negotiate to accomodate the utterly baseless demand to cease research whaling in the Southern Ocean, and that the anti-whaling harliners were more interested in flexing their authority over waters they didn't own rather than reduce the number of whales taken.

    Posted in: U.S., Australia, NZ 'disappointed' over Japan whale hunt

  • 1

    OssanAmerica

    2020hindsightsDec. 15, 2011 - 10:42AM JST Really? I do remember "Devils on the Doorstep" and it was banned in China when it was released. It was also >released in Japan where it got good reviews.

    The Chinse director was also banned by the Chinese government from making movies for a time.

    Posted in: Christian Bale denies Nanjing Massacre film is propaganda

  • 2

    OssanAmerica

    CrickyDec. 15, 2011 - 11:07AM JST It's not the same, a Government approved policy Vs right of conquest. Please take a pause and imagine those > close to you forcibly taken and gang raped, I just don't see how this is acceptable. Then or now."

    The Pan-pan girls were a Government approved system. GHQ wanted "safe clean" prostiutes for the GIs, and the defeated J-govt complied. Ironically some of the girls were former IJA comfort girls. Lookmat Vietnam: http://zeroempty000.blogspot.com/2007/04/official-brothel-during-vietnam-war.html And even the South Korean troops in Vietnam: http://zeroempty000.blogspot.com/2007/04/comfort-women-during-vietnam-war-for.html And it not just "then" it;s "now" as well. http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/moderndaycomfort_women.pdf And not every woman in the IJA comfort women system was abducted or gang raped. Nor were they "sex slaves" since they were paid with some making moire than the enlisted men. http://studyofenglish.wordpress.com/2007/09/15/report-of-the-usarmy-at-ww2-on-ianfu-comfort-women-japan-sexslave-korea/ There is far far more to the "Comfort Women" issue than the protests and "accounts" of the few remaining WWII survivors.

    Posted in: Former sex slaves hold 1,000th protest outside Japan's embassy in Seoul

  • 3

    OssanAmerica

    CrickyDec. 15, 2011 - 10:31AM JST OssanAmerica Japan ran the system, it's on them- spreading the blame just belittles and buys into the lie that it >was not their fault. It was a systematic rape business. To claim "Koreans" used it too! It's like saying they did it too, >so me doing it is OK Pathetic argument

    May sound pathetic to you but it's a fact, Doesn't absolve the Japanese military at all. But to close your eyes to all the others who played a role in this is. just so that you can blame just one party is not only wrong, it's unfair to the women who suffered.

    Posted in: Former sex slaves hold 1,000th protest outside Japan's embassy in Seoul

  • 3

    OssanAmerica

    "There is a book written by a Japanese woman who's drunkard father sold her to the army...it's a hard read.

    Yup, daughters were often sold not just in Japan but in Korea as well. And that's how most of the comfort women were recruited. SFJP330 is correct in saying that "abduction" was not an issue at the time, Korean fathers who sold their daughters, the Korean middlemen who procured the girls, the 240,000 Korean men in the Imperial Japanese armed forces who also made use of the comfort women system, the South Korean government that negotiated with Japan in 1965 and received money,,,,,there are more villans in this story than just "Japan".

    Posted in: Former sex slaves hold 1,000th protest outside Japan's embassy in Seoul

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    sfjp330Dec. 15, 2011 - 07:46AM JST OssanAmericaDec. 15, 2011 - 07:17AM JST. The Senkakus never became Japanese territory by any agreement >between Japan and China. "If Japan has definite ownership without doubt, why did Japan offer to explore resources jointly with China? Sounds like a big concession by Japan if you ask me. If Japan owns it, they didn't need to ask China. It shows Japan has a weak claim and they know it."

    You are confusing the issue of the Senkaku Islands with the entire East China Sea.

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    globalwatcher, I was unaware that the Secretary of Commerce had anything to do with the State Department. Additonally the scope of US trade relations with Iceland as opposed to Japan is incomparable. Even further, the claim that some country is violating the 1892 moratorium on commercial whaling has no bearing on a country that is NOT engaged in commercial whaling.

    Posted in: U.S., Australia, NZ 'disappointed' over Japan whale hunt

  • 1

    OssanAmerica

    sfjp330Dec. 15, 2011 - 06:56AM JST In 1951, Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed by Japan and the Allied Powers (excluding both the ROC >and the PRC) stated that, "Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Paracels".

    The Senkakus are not part of Formosa(Taiwan) or the Paracels.

    Article Four of the separate peace treaty signed between Japan and the ROC in 1952 declared that all agreements >between Japan and China before 1941 were null and void.

    The Senkakus never became Japanese territory by any agreement between Japan and China.

    As stated above, it is reasonable to take the mean that Diaoyu Islands should be returned to China because the >Diaoyu Islands are one part of Taiwan. However, Japanese have maintained that the islands should not be >included in these treaties.

    The Senkakus were never part of Taiwan. Furthermore they were never taken from China (Qing/Ching) by force as they were Terra Nullius when Japan followed proper Internationally accepted procedure to incorpoirate them in early 1884. For these reasons the victorius allied powers did not include them in territories to be returned to their previous owners.

    Posted in: China sends patrol ship to disputed waters

  • 3

    OssanAmerica

    Any Chinese movie about WWII is a propaganda film. Proof is that there have been films that didn't contain ENOUGH propaganda and the director was chastised or worse. Remember Devils at the Doorstep? Christan Bale either doesn't pay too much attention to reality or as a party to this film simply has to tow the party line. He's not much of an actor anyway imho.

    Posted in: Christian Bale denies Nanjing Massacre film is propaganda

  • 0

    OssanAmerica

    warnerbroDec. 14, 2011 - 10:49PM JST For heaven's sake, yes! Build a base there, then post Ishihara and his senile father there to defend the land of >Amaterasu. They're both nothing but paper tigers.

    That's fine. The base will be providing information to the US 7th Fleet. Excellent idea.

    Posted in: LDP's Ishihara wants base on China-claimed islands

  • 1

    OssanAmerica

    Japan conducts Research Whaling under the IWC regulations. The IWC itself is a regulatory body for the whaing industry. It is also tasked with ensuring that global stocks are not depleted. To that end the IWC Scientific Committee utilizes the data provided from research whaling. The IWC is not an academic marine biology research center. That is not their charter and not their goal. Japan's position is entirely defended by their compliance with those IWC regulations. The IWC exempts research whaling from recognizing moratoriums and sanctuaries. It's all in writing at the IWC website. Which, explains why the anti-whaing nations can only "express dissappointment" and many anti-whaling advocates can only deny the facts. Of course many of them have never bothered to read the IWC site either. The closest Japan came to ceasing it's completely legal research whaling was when the IWC offered a compromise in 2010 to break the gridlock between the two fafctions. However this was undermined by Australia and other anti-whaling nations who refused to compromise at all. A moment of thought suggests that the anti-whaling nations are in conflict with the IWC charter to start with and they should not even be members. Perhaps they should start an Anti-IWC where their regulations will apply soleley to their members.

    Posted in: U.S., Australia, NZ 'disappointed' over Japan whale hunt

  • -1

    OssanAmerica

    globalwatcherDec. 15, 2011 - 03:19AM JST The whole issue is escalating to the point that is nothing but stupid. I recalled Japanese whaling industry has just >filed a law suit to the State of Washington last week, then now the US State Dept is taking over and coodinating with >Australia, NZ, Holland agains Japan.

    Really? What action is US State Dept which has absolutely nothing to do with whaling taking? What exactly are they "taking over"? If you read the article you would realize that those countries "expressed dissappointment". That's not exactly what anyone would call an operation of any consequence.

    Many more countries will join them against Japanese Whaling industry. Well, it seems like the verdict is already in >for the dispute. The whaling war of Japan is over no mater how you look at it.

    Nope the verdict is likely years ahead and when the ICJ finally gets around to hearing the Australian claim.

    Hope everyone can go home before someone gets hurt in process. Maybe within a couple weeks we will see >Japanese PM speaks in public showing his deep bowing in regret and apology. Today, The world has a low >tolorence towards "loophole", "terrorism" and "corruptions". Hope Japan gets this message sooner.

    Agree SSCSI should cease their lawless acts of violence, go home and demonstrate peacefully like all the other anti-whaling orgaizations.

    Posted in: U.S., Australia, NZ 'disappointed' over Japan whale hunt

Follow us

View all

  • Translator

    Translator
    ZAIHON, Inc. (日本財務翻訳株式会社), Tokyo
    Salary: ¥6.0M / Year Negotiable
  • Full-time English Teacher  - Osaka

    Full-time English Teacher - Osaka
    Epion English Language Schools, Osaka
    Salary: ¥200,000 ~ ¥250,000 / Month Depending on your ability and experience
  • Part-time English Teacher - Osaka

    Part-time English Teacher - Osaka
    Epion English Language Schools, Osaka
    Salary: ¥10,000 ~ ¥15,000 / Day Depending on how many days a week are worked