« Back To Top

Seiharinokaze said...

  • Seiharinokaze at 08:48 PM JST - 10th August

    However, there are also right-wingers in the church, and some of them go so far as saying that Catholics not only can, but should visit Yasukuni because of something a Vatican cardinal said in 1936.

    In 1936 it was not Papa Pius XII but Pius XI who reigned as Pope…

    Posted in The Catholic Church and Yasukuni shrine at 08:48 PM JST - 10th August

  • Seiharinokaze at 03:02 PM JST - 10th August

    I heard that unlike Protestant churches the Vatican used to recognize the war between Japan and China was more of a war against Bolshevism. That's why the Vatican approved Catholics' visit to the shrine during the wartime and also why after the war Fr. Bruno Bitter, the representative of the…

    Posted in The Catholic Church and Yasukuni shrine at 03:02 PM JST - 10th August

  • Seiharinokaze at 12:40 AM JST - 2nd August

    bibric

    The game is over. Now, it's time to talk about Tsushima and Oki Islands which originally belongs to Korea

    More importantly the game cannot be over until the two Koreas becomes one. How about moving forward on your own before bothering about Tsushima and Oki?

    Besides what does Daemado…

    Posted in Bush orders S Korea's ownership of disputed islets reinstated in database at 12:40 AM JST - 2nd August

  • Seiharinokaze at 12:36 AM JST - 31st July

    But the matter-of-the-fact is, Korea now occupies (owns) the island and that is not going to change. It's gone. It's as brutally simple as that. It is no longer claimable as Japanese territory. In the same way as the Ainu have no claim to Hokkaido and Northern territories stolen from…

    Posted in Japan criticizes S Korean PM's Takeshima visit at 12:36 AM JST - 31st July

  • Seiharinokaze at 03:03 PM JST - 27th July

    bibric

    What kind of relation did Choi Nam-seon's book have with the map at all? Why are they displayed together again?

    The map on enjoyjapan.naver.com was probably not the one drawn up or reflecting the situation around 1930. Please look at the wording on the right side of the map…

    Posted in S Korea reportedly plans to build hotel on disputed islets at 03:03 PM JST - 27th July

  • Seiharinokaze at 07:33 PM JST - 26th July

    bibric

    Again, let's see the historical context. Koreans and other your neighboring countries see this issue as a "Japanese colonial legacy".

    Takeshima issue is not a colonial legacy. No country ever occupied or ruled the islets before 1905.

    According to Mr. Gerry Bevers http://www.occidentalism.org/?p=670

    *In 1946, one year after Korea…

    Posted in S Korea reportedly plans to build hotel on disputed islets at 07:33 PM JST - 26th July

  • Seiharinokaze at 10:41 PM JST - 23rd July

    Tohoshinki 東方神起's new single ranks No. 1 in the weekly chart. And John-Hoon's 4th. It seems Japanese music listeners are not upset at all by what Koreans have got infuriated over. It's called Nukani Kugi (like nailing into rice bran). Cultural exchange is not spoiled.

    Posted in Japan-S Korea islet row spoils more cultural exchanges at 10:41 PM JST - 23rd July

  • Seiharinokaze at 02:29 AM JST - 22nd July

    bibric

    Your logic is A is B because C is A without actually mentioning C in the original proposition. Perhaps I better desist from asking anymore how identical to Liancourt Rocks the islet called Sokdo was and why you ceased to call it by the name that was formally announced…

    Posted in S Korea rejects Japan's proposal for talks at 02:29 AM JST - 22nd July

  • Seiharinokaze at 01:14 AM JST - 21st July

    bibric

    In addition to the Korean Decree, the 1905 Japanese announcement of Dokdo was illegal. The Japanese people in the Sinemahyun already recognized that it belonged to Korean territory. See the website: Illegality of Japanese 1905 Dokdo Announcement. http://www.dokdo-takeshima.com/dokdo-expansionism-politics.html

    Please let me know in which part of the web site…

    Posted in S Korea rejects Japan's proposal for talks at 01:14 AM JST - 21st July

  • Seiharinokaze at 05:49 PM JST - 20th July

    bibric

    Bakufu recognized Ulleungdo as a Korean territory but did not recognized Takeshima as such even after what is called the Affairs of Takeshia of 1692-6. This perception continued throughout the Tokugawa period into Meiji period until 1905 in Japan.

    http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/sovereignty.html

    http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/prohibition.html

    As for what you called the Takeshima Incident…

    Posted in S Korea rejects Japan's proposal for talks at 05:49 PM JST - 20th July

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...11 ›