Thursday February 16, 2012

TheQuestion's past comments

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    The proof is in what people do with their hands everyday.

    Fingerprints and faces can be used for identifying criminals. If a person covers up their face it's difficult to generate a positive identification. If I were to walk into a store with a full face mask on I'd be asked to leave or have security called on me, simple as that.

    Posted in: French bid to ban veils worries allies, tourists

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    I am appalled that some of you can't fathom why a women would want to cover up, even her face.

    I just view it as a security risk. Same way I'd view it if a bunch of men decided that as part of their religion they should wear ski-masks and gloves everywhere.

    Posted in: French bid to ban veils worries allies, tourists

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Should have jumped

    Thats what I was thinking.

    Posted in: New Zealand skydiving plane crashes; 9 die

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    The woman is poison, but she is easy on the eyes.

    Compared to pepper spray maybe...

    Posted in: Purse, cocaine not hers, Hilton tells Vegas police

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Drug user is not equalilent to drug addict.

    I dunno, in the words of Rick James, "Cocaine is a hell of a drug!"

    If she can do drugs without causing trouble, then the trouble is the people chasing her around for doing drugs.

    I have no issue with victimless crimes, however, as cocaine is still illegal than there is no reason why she should not be suffer the same penalties as anybody else in possession of illicit substances.

    Self important overbearing invasive law making puritans have no place in this society.

    It's America friend, all people have a place in this society even if we don't like them.

    Posted in: Paris Hilton arrested on cocaine charge in Vegas

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Go back as long as you want and you will find it was common in warfare.

    This is anything but a common war. A conflict in which an outside force enters, defeats established power, sets up a government made up of locals, protects said government, and fights against a group of ununiformed insurgents that blow themselves up in crowds of civilians is a rarity known only to the modern world.

    Posted in: Afghan militants in U.S. uniforms storm 2 NATO bases

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    The joys of capitalism.

    Capitalism has never existed in the U.S so...

    Perhaps if there were true capitalism many would fail, for the better?

    Revolution with a twist...I like it.

    You know, with millions of people ready to SNAP, I am just thankful that they don't have ready access to firearms, because that would make the situation so much worse.

    Not really, I've owned firearms for the majority of my life, and so have my friends and family and not one gun crime in the bunch. The only time I've ever experience a gun crime was in an attempted mugging in Detroit and that turned out badly for the mugger. I did, however, get a neat scar from a hunting knife in Chicago.

    it sucks to be in America right now

    Yet it really doesn't. Nobody starves to death (barring an eating disorder or getting locked in a closet), nobody puts you under arrest for not agreeing with a majority, U.S. prisoners enjoy more comforts than most law abiding citizens in the rest of the world, and you have virtually unlimited potential you just have to tap into it. There is absolutly no other place on the face of the earth I would rather live.

    Unfortunately, being a hard working American depends on having an employer and customers stable enough to support those high moral principles.

    Not really, most of my jobs have been working for jerks and most of them involved forced overtime, less than minimum wage, and verbal abuse. A hard worker will always find a place to work even if he hates it.

    Posted in: America feels ready to snap

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Depends on the situation. I agree that by and large Americans (and all NORTH AMERICANS, for that matter) can be very generous, but clearly in this situation they are not, are they?

    "The U.S. government has been largest donor to the flood relief effort, allocating $200 million to date." So I guess even if the U.S. is the largest donor in the world it's still not quite generous enough.

    I'm blaming it on the people who refuse to give money for such inadequate reasons (again, paranoia).

    Considering conservative voters donate more blood, time, and money (proportionate relative to income and in volume) than liberal voters I'd say you're blaming the wrong people. Considering one cannot dictate how the Red Cross and other charities dish out the money they receive I think it's fair to say that conservatives have probably contributed more to the Pakistan flood relief effort than non-conservatives as well, although whether or not they agree with this practice is subject to debate.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservativesmoreliberal_giv.html

    Posted in: Tepid response from U.S. public to Pakistan flood relief

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Your reasoning is un-sound.

    In what way? You support embryotic stem cell reasearch for medical purposes, an admirable reason. Others oppose it because they equate the destruction of an embryo to the destruction of human life, and on a very basic level it is. I don't have a problem with people electing to participate in potentially lethal studies or the donation of one's body to science. However an embryo has little option in the matter. The possible benefits of embryotic stem cell research could be substantial, I simply don't feel the ends justify the means based on current research.

    Likely if you found yourself or a loved one blind or in a wheelchair which might very well be remedied by said stem cell research, you might change your mind.

    They would have never forgiven me.

    It's based on faith, not reality, and you're potentially opposing the advancement of healing fellow humans on this basis.

    Faith is fact to those who attest to it. A person can only act in accordance with their own codes of moral conduct. I can't ask any more of anyone.

    Posted in: Obama stem cell regulations temporarily blocked

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Sorry the Q, I didn't get it :-)

    I've never claimed to be a comedian.

    I don't have anymore answers than science has to suggest, but the oness on you is to prove your fictive god exists.

    Proof would be a little counter productive to the whole faith thing. I like my faith, it feels right so I go with it. I've got nothing to prove and no reason to try.

    They've also made a lot of progress in reverse engineering stem cells from adult cells.

    Others have already stated that it's not adult and amniotic stem cells people have a problem with, just embryotic.

    Posted in: Obama stem cell regulations temporarily blocked

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Meaning?

    It was a joke. Albeit not a particularly good one.

    Posted in: Obama stem cell regulations temporarily blocked

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    And if they did engage and an all out battle erupted you'd all complain about how the UN incited a firefight and civilians got killed.

    There's a lot of things I'd do if the UN intervened (first and foremost would be to die of shock) but the last thing on my mind would be complaining.

    Posted in: Some 200 women gang-raped near Congo U.N. base

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Easy to say "defend your wife" how many people looked down the business-end of a rifle/gun/machete/etc?

    There’s a story behind that and it ends with a neat scar on my part and a neat hospital ride on theirs. The only acceptable response to a threat is immediate action. I can't speak for others but whenever I've been threatened the only emotion I can well up is rage, the very idea of somebody violating my person or my family is enough to illicit a response.

    So yes, it is easy to say 'defend your wife' because you're a man for God's sake and if you're not willing to stand up for something sacred you're very existence is futile. PC be damned it's a man's duty to defend no matter the cost.

    Also I would assume many were fathers and thus were worried about their kids future if they expire, etc. Plus, how many were trained fighters?

    What use is a man who can't, or won't, protect his family? What kind of example is it to his children that when faced with death it's best to let those around him suffer? You don't need to be a trained fighter to fight, winning is a whole other story.

    Not that easy to throw your life away.

    Sure it is, people do it all the time. Most people just don't do it for the right reason.

    Posted in: Some 200 women gang-raped near Congo U.N. base

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    This article is not talking about adult stem cells research.

    Simply stating the advantage of the alternative.

    At least man exists....

    Don't make me go all existential on you, there will be angst.

    Posted in: Obama stem cell regulations temporarily blocked

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Embryonic stem cell research has a lot of potential, but so do other abhorrent practices. As it stands Adult and Amniotic stem cells can be collected and used with far less fuss.

    Posted in: Obama stem cell regulations temporarily blocked

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Utterly pointless waste of life, if the man couldn't understand why the police let him go he should have looked at his own actions.

    Guns are just too easily available in Philippines.

    Actually the M16 rifle the shooter used is illegal for citizens to own in the Philippines. The following is a passage from Philippines Center on Transnational Crime in regards to the number and power of firearms a person may possess, I lifted the section on retired officers as this would be the most likely to apply even though he was technically fired.

    Officers and non-commissioned police officers enlisted personnel in the active service and in the retired list of the Philippine National Police (PNP) and Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) may hold under license a maximum of only one (1) low powered rifle caliber .22 or shotgun not heavier than 12 gauge and one (1) sidearm of any type or caliber.

    http://www.pctc.gov.ph/laws/basicFA.htm

    Posted in: 9 killed on hijacked Philippine tourist bus

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    It's cases like this when I truly believe that a PMC would be the professional’s scalpel to the UN's moron wielded sledgehammer. Before its dissolution Executive Outcomes did a fantastic job in Angola and Sierra Leone and they did it with fewer men, less money, and they were still more effective than a large UN presence. The best course for dealing with these rebels is to surgically eliminate them; total war is the only way to win.

    I thought "raping and pillaging" stopped in the civilised world hundreds of years ago?

    Human cruelty is timeless; it permeates our history and will continue on so long as a single human draws breath.

    Posted in: Some 200 women gang-raped near Congo U.N. base

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    I'm a doctor, not a butcher.

    Then find a scientist or a skilled mortician, breaking things is easy enough with the proper motivation. Come to think of it a butcher may very well suffice, although using an unskilled person in lieu of a professional may equate to using a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed and would significantly reduce the chance of survival.

    If someone ran in to the road in front of your car causing you to swerve and knock down a child, would it be 'appropriate' if your punishment was to be placed in front of a speeding car?

    I'm sure a wrench to the torso or extremities would be sufficient to remind one of their carelessness.

    Well, how about prison as would be the case in a country with some sort of civilized legal system?

    14 months for a lifetime of misery? I'd be angry at the prospect as well. Equal reciprocity is so much more fulfilling than modern justice, better results as well.

    I'm sure Saudi prisons are not fun places to be in.

    Good, in my honest opinion a prison should be a deplorable place with limited human contact, nutritious but near vomit inducing food, and only enough sunlight to remind a prisoner of what they have lost. The very idea of having television, books, exercise time, and conjugal visits are entirely counter to the soul breaking task a prison exists for. Utterly confounding.

    Posted in: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    Absolutely barbaric.

    True. We like to lie to ourselves, tell ourselves that we're above such punishments, we're not. Compassion, forgiveness, and modern justices are fundamentally flawed in that they are utterly self-serving to the self righteous people that embrace them. Those that fear to do the grim work necessary to perpetuate society should step out of the way or buckle down. It is not the duty of government to forgive or show compassion, it's to preserve the society they represent.

    For asking for such a punishment the victim is indeed vindictive, barbaric, and possessed of incredible bloodlust that does not, however, make it wrong. The victim, paralyzed and unable to exact justice for himself, is probably filled with seething and completely understandable rage. Especially considering the meager term of imprisonment and the fact the perpetrator was allowed to live his life and even become a school teacher. Prison teaches criminals nothing save that next time the commit a crime they should work harder to not get caught. Punishments like these give the victims some reciprocity and set an example for others, I approve absolutely.

    Posted in: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment

  • 0

    TheQuestion

    I'm almost overhwelmed with how much I don't care.

    Posted in: White House says Obama is Christian, prays daily

Follow us

View all