Wednesday February 15, 2012

Wolfpack's past comments

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    So he pulled a Clinton - what's the big deal? Screwing around on your wife was okay for Kennedy and Clinton. If the Republicans also change their minds and decide it's no big deal, then there really isn't anything left to talk about.

    Posted in: Woman alleges affair with presidential hopeful Cain

  • 2

    Wolfpack

    This woman had an interesting life; a front row seat of history.

    Posted in: Stalin's daughter Lana Peters dies at 85

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    With heat-trapping carbon at record levels in the atmosphere, U.N. climate negotiations opened Monday with pressure building to salvage the only treaty limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

    This is a flat out untrue statement. Anyone that has read anything about the history of earths climate knows that the amount of carbon in the atmosphere is not at a "record level" right now. Don't they are editors at the Associated Press?

    So the "journalist" that wrote this article writes this:

    As if to illustrate the effects of global warming, a fierce storm on the eve of the talks flooded shack settlements and killed at least five people in the port city hosting the international gathering.

    Then in the very next paragraph writes:

    Scientists say such unusual weather has become more frequent and will continue to happen more often as the Earth warms, although it is impossible to attribute any individual event to climate change.

    In other words, there is absolutely no link between the "fierce storm" and climate change (ie. man-made global warming) and it does not "illustrate the effects of global warming".

    This isn't just lazy journalism, this is a point of view being pushed as news.

    As the talks opened, Canadian television reported that Ottawa will announce its formal withdraw from the Kyoto accord next month.

    So Canada has now joined former President Bush and the US. Next, Japan will reject further binding limits on the emission of plant food as well. Why? For the same reason that the US Senate unanimously rejected the Kyoto Protocol in a test vote, unless so called 'developing countries' like China agree to binding limits, any treaty is simply national economic suicide that would not prevent the onset of the "tipping point" that green fundamentalists are forever babbling about.

    Global warming is a leftist fraud. There is no consensus. This is politicized science on the part of activists promoting an anti-capitalist agenda.

    Posted in: Divergent views signal tough climate talks ahead

  • -2

    Wolfpack

    @Laguna:

    a look at the facts show that Obama has shown more restraint than most any modern president.

    Are you serious? Obama raised the baseline budget by nearly $1 trillion per year since 2009. This is on top of the gap turned over from the Bush years. Of the $4.4 trillion he has added to the debt, $3 trillion in three years is clearly Obama's. The remainder is due to his failure to cut spending (or raise taxes) to make up the difference.

    President Obama is the worst president in American history. The budget and economic numbers alone tell the story.

    Posted in: Failure looms for U.S. debt talks

  • -1

    Wolfpack

    The Obama Administration has added $4.4 trillion to the debt and there is still a year to go. The failure of the "super committee" is meaningless. The $1.2 trillion sequestor itself is a joke. It's not even a cut in real dollar terms but in the amount of projected increase in spending of over 7% a year. These yahoo's in both parties will not get serious about cutting spending until the governments credit rating get's down to junk status. Tax increases of any amount - even of 99% on the millionaires and billionaires - will not make a dent in the real problem - which is huge entitlement costs.

    Posted in: Failure looms for U.S. debt talks

  • 1

    Wolfpack

    I can remember when U.S. politicians weren't expected to make such a spectacle of their religious beliefs.

    I can remember when Liberals used to believe in God and didn't hate people who do. I cannot understand the Left's intolerance for them. (Disclaimer: I am not Christian or religious). Religion is an important social issue the world over and shunning it is senseless.

    Posted in: Six candidates dwell on religious issues during debate

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    Fur (and animal skins in general) is the traditional clothing of every human being that has ever lived. It isn't politically correct to say but it just so happens to be true. In this case, Ueto is wearing fur because she is a 'talento' and it is an expensive article of clothing. Because of the expense, relatively few people wear them these days. The idea that the human use of animals is wrong is a modern concept that is a luxury for people with the wealth, means, and sense of moral superiority to deem it so.

    Posted in: Aya Ueto wins Fur of the Year award

  • -6

    Wolfpack

    Speaking mostly in French at a press conference in Algiers, Stone said he was shocked by the global financial crisis and “to see how money was venerated by America.”

    Another filthy-rich Liberal American condeming his own country for pursuing wealth. I can't decide if I am more astonished by his stupidity or the hillarious self-paraody.

    Posted in: Director Oliver Stone lashes out at U.S.

  • -1

    Wolfpack

    No thanks.

    Posted in: Lady Gaga's photo book to be released on Nov 22

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    “A new generation of leaders is just getting started,” Sachs wrote.

    If these whiners are the next generation of leaders, America is in serious trouble.

    Posted in: Anti-Wall Street movement loses home, but not cause

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    @SuperLib

    You are mixing and matching here. The blame for the crash can be spread around to a lot of different places. If you choose to focus on the government it's most likely because you want to criticize the government.

    The actions of individual borrowers and banks were a direct result of the loosening of regulations on the part of the government. The government gave it's blessing and subsidiy via Fannie and Freddie. Ironically, it is the Democrats that pushed for loosening lending rules while Republicans warned against it. The governments loosening of lending rules - cause - led to excesses that followed - effect. The goal of promoting home ownership is laudable but not at the expense of throwing out common sense risk management. It is amazing how common sense can be overwhelmed when placed up against Rep. Franks incessant charges of discrimination and racism. No one wants to be called a racist so it is difficult for politicians to make the case that it is not racism, but simply good business sense and in the interest of all not to promote risky business practices.

    Posted in: Occupy protests under pressure after 4 deaths

  • -1

    Wolfpack

    Now here is where you or Wolfpack suggest that things were probably stolen from his tent while he lie there dead, because it seems you two will say just about anything except admit the protests might some justification.

    Some of their complaints are legit but most are not. It seems their biggest complaint is that they don't have as much money as wealthy people do. Forget the fact that some of them - like Michael Moore - are millionaires themselves. Sitting around in a tent in the middle of a city park and asking the government for a handout isn't going to help much with class envy. Nor will it pay off the huge amount in loads that they voluntarily agreed to.

    Is is because of the government's constant attempts at micromanage the economy with poorly considered regulations and convoluted and corrupt tax policy that has caused unemployment to be so high and prevented businesses from hiring. Government allows the financial markets to be manipulated by mandating that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae make bad home loans. The American economy has been stuck in a cycle of boom and bust for two decades due to idiotic policies like this. Add in Congress's crony capitalism and the Feds overzealous desire to print money to inflate away the nations economic problems and you are left with nothing but class envy and fear. They protestors should be "Occupying the White House" not Wall Street.

    Posted in: Occupy protests under pressure after 4 deaths

  • -3

    Wolfpack

    The retro-hippies have graduated from defecating on cars, property crimes, drugs, public sex, molestation of underage girls, rape, all the way up to murder. And the left was calling the Tea Party folks extreme. I suppose the Occupiers believe this is an how they can get back at 'The Man' for all of their injustices against them.

    Posted in: Occupy protests under pressure after 4 deaths

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    Had a campaigning John Edwards been accused in 04 by a neighbor of Karl Rove's we can all imagine the liberal hysteria that would have occasioned.

    This is exactly correct. It is also why politics in America today is in such sad shape. The media does not report the news it decides what "is" news and pushes their interpretation of it based on their liberal world view. It's a miracle that any Republican could have gotten elected president over the past 70 years in America. The media's handling of the accusations against Cain and those numerous accusations against Clinton, and Hill's against Clarence Thomas are text book examples of the media's double standard. Even in John Edward's case, it got the benefit of the doubt from the press all the way up until definitive evidence to the contrary came to light.

    Posted in: Cain says he won't be forced out of White House race by sex scandal claims

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    @rickyvee

    who knew JP was run buy lolita-files.

    Apparently you are the last person with any interest at all in Japan to figure that out.

    But as to the substance of this particular AKB48 promotion, it seems fairly innocuous to me. Well that is assuming the image is just their face and not a picture of them in lingerie or something - which at this point wouldn't be a total surprise to anyone.

    Posted in: AKB48 members to appear on stamps

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    @ExportExpert:

    Any candidate who mentions , refers to, alludes to, speaks, utters or mumbles anything to do with any religion should immediately be disqualified.

    Freedom of speech is a right so basic to America that such a notion of disqualifying a person from standing for elective office based on what they say is an untenable position. A speech code regarding religion or any other conceivable subject - whether people agree or disagree with it or not - is against American values. The voters are best equipped to determine whether a person is qualified or not.

    There are some conservatives that will not support Romney because of his Mormon religion. There are some liberals that will not support Romney precisely because he considers himself a Christian. Romney will in all likelihood be the Republican nominee. With the complete failure of President Obama's economic policies and the dire conditions for so many Americans, it is more likely that Obama's inadequate handling of the economy will be a greater drag on his chances than Romney's religion to his. If history is a guide, Romney will win in a landslide next November.

    Posted in: Mormonism weighs on Romney candidacy

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    The killing will stop whenever President Obama decides that he will no longer stand by and watch an outlaw regime slaughter it's own people. Obama will know when that time comes whenever the French and British tell him it's time to be morally outraged again.

    Posted in: Syria takes bloody new turn; 250 killed in 11 days

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    I thought this whole issue was settled during the Clinton administration. The National Organization for Women came out in support of the man against multiple female accusers. Democrats were claiming that when you, "drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find. ... There just trailer trash”. Can we not expect the same in the case of Herman Cain's accusers?

    Posted in: Cain sex accuser goes public in New York; he denies it on late-night TV

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    Steve Williams is very rich because of Tiger Woods. Whatever happened between them that caused Williams to be fired doesn't change that fact. Williams would have been best advised to take his huge bundle of money and keep his mouth shut. The whole notion of a caddy acting like a prima donna is ludicrous.

    The so called 'racist' comment isn't racist because it isn't even true. Wood's isn't black. Even if he was black, calling a black person a black person is only racist if you equate it with the n-word; which of course no one does. The pejorative adjective is a matter of opinion that I would guess he ex-wife might have used more than once in reference to her former husband.

    Posted in: Tiger Woods racism row moves to Sydney

  • 0

    Wolfpack

    Now that they accuser(s) have come out of the woodwork it's 'Game On'. Right now it's 'he said she said'. Like with Bill Clinton however, it doesn't look good for Cain. He says he is innocent but let's get real, now that Bialek has come out from hiding and standing in front of the public stated that Cain put his hand up her dress and tried to pull her head towards his crotch, his reputation is done (unless for some reason she recants). This is politics and the accusation is enough for a conservative to be knocked off. Given the woman's track record of financial and legal troubles, it isn't out of the realm of possibilities that she is an opportunist that is hoping to secure a big payday by becoming the next Anita Hill. People will do just about anything for money. She knows that she can expect sympathetic treatment from the press.

    As the accuser, she is just as much on trial as Cain is. She should have to prove what she did is true. But not in politics - that's just in court. Unless you are a Democrat (Clinton/Edwards), there has to be proof that you are innocent or else your political career is over. There is no presumption of innocence. The media hates Black conservatives and this just gives them the green light to pile on whether he is innocent or not.

    The most obvious question that Sharon Bialek must answer is why she attend a very recent political rally where she was seen embracing Cain if she is still so angry by his actions over a decade ago? Conversely, why did Cain say recently that he didn't remember her? That's the part I don't get. Someone is lying based on more than just a 'he said she said' accusation. I wouldn't be surprised if these two had an affair and she is getting back at him for some reason. OK, not likely but I wouldn't be surprised.

    Posted in: Third woman says she was harassed by Cain

Follow us

Facebook
Twitter

View all