« Back To Top

bibric said...

• 

  bibric at 09:42 AM JST - 7th August

  imagawa

  I'm very sorry that at this point, I agree US has to station in Japan. Sorry about it. I know how hard it is to live under the foreign influence!

  US military bases have caused numerous crimes to the innocent citizens in South Korea and Japan. Still many Cons…

  Posted in Does the U.S. need to have military bases anywhere in Japan? at 09:42 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 09:30 AM JST - 7th August

  What a non-sense!

  Nuclear weapon was used to collapse and ban the Japanese militarism!

  Posted in Hiroshima mayor hopes next U.S. president will back ban on nuclear weapons at 09:30 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 09:26 AM JST - 7th August

  For last four decades, Japanese were successful to have it seen as victims of the WWII by propagating this Nuclear issue.

  Yet, think about who was the Aggressor of the war II. Think about how many victims under the relentless rule of Japan were saved by the end of the…

  Posted in Do you get tired of all the news coverage of the A-bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at this time each year? at 09:26 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 09:15 AM JST - 7th August

  Japan...it's really hard to understand Japanese are civilized in terms of "humanity and dignity on themselves and others".

  The US, the strong military power, the primitive measure is very useful and effective in this country, Japan.

  Even China, Russia, and North Korea are eager to have the US military stationing…

  Posted in Does the U.S. need to have military bases anywhere in Japan? at 09:15 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 09:07 AM JST - 7th August

  NK and Bush are in the "Honeymoon", right!

  Posted in Japan, N Korea to hold talks on abductions in China on Aug 11-12 at 09:07 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 09:02 AM JST - 7th August

  "About Hiroshima nuclear incidents"

  First of all, think about which side was "the aggressor" of the WWII!

  Second, think about which side saved more numerous innocent victims in Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, China, Taiwan and Korea.

  Finally, think about the role of the head of your country!

  You always…

  Posted in Bush orders S Korea's ownership of disputed islets reinstated in database at 09:02 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 08:48 AM JST - 7th August

  hermitage

  I sincerely hope that you take more critical position different from Japanese Cons.

  The 1965 treaty doesn't cover "any crime that Japan committed before and during the Japanese colonial period". If you think that the 1965 has completely finalized all issues derived from the Japanese colonial legacy, it's just…

  Posted in Bush orders S Korea's ownership of disputed islets reinstated in database at 08:48 AM JST - 7th August

• 

  bibric at 04:51 AM JST - 3rd August

  *nipponlove *

  Excellent point!

  Posted in Japan criticizes S Korean PM's Takeshima visit at 04:51 AM JST - 3rd August

• 

  bibric at 04:15 AM JST - 3rd August

  *pathat *

  Blue Tiger's main point is the reparations given to South Korea are in fact "quasi reparations", including some loans with low interest rates.

  Singapore had the similar reparations for 100,000 Singaporean's murdering, including half of it with no-interest loan. What a non-sense of 250 million for 100,000 killings!…

  Posted in Bush orders S Korea's ownership of disputed islets reinstated in database at 04:15 AM JST - 3rd August

• 

  bibric at 10:26 PM JST - 2nd August

  hermitage

  Dokdo was part of Korean territory before 1952 Rhee' declaration. You may allege that 1905 before Ulsa treaty Japan declared its possession. Yet, 1900, the Korean government declared the world that Dokdo belongs to Korea. Dokdo is not taken by the Rhee's declaration,but by the historical fact of several…

  Posted in Bush orders S Korea's ownership of disputed islets reinstated in database at 10:26 PM JST - 2nd August