-
- International Account Manager
- Cosmo PR Corporation (株式会社 コスモ・ピーアール), 東京都
- Salary: 年収 500万円 相談可
-
- Research Officer (Trade and Economic)
- Australian Embassy / オーストラリア大使館, 東京都
- Salary: 月給 51万9167円 ~ 51万9167円
-
- ERP Consultant, System Engineer
- Nakamoto & Associates, 東京都
- Salary: 月給 25万円 ~ 70万円 相談可 インターンシップ
-
- Restaurant Service Attendant
- Mandarin Oriental, Tokyo - マンダリン オリエンタル東京, 東京都
- Salary: 給与についての記載なし
-
- In Room Dining Ordertaker
- Mandarin Oriental, Tokyo - マンダリン オリエンタル東京, 東京都
- Salary: 給与についての記載なし
2
doombird
Okinawamike, that's a good point - the article says that she left food and spending money, but also that over a week passed. From the information given there's no way to know, of course. All we commenters can do is speculate and conclude.
Article Unavailable
25
doombird
In additon to Mom's negligence, there's another thing that really bothers me about this story that I'd like to bring up:
How could a 14 year old possibly let her 3 year old little sister starve to death? Is that a complete lack of education or a complete lack of compassion? They were left with food. A 3-year-old would be able to communicate that she's hungry. Regardless of this being unquestionably irresponsible of their mother, a 14-year-old while still a child is far from helpless, and should have been able to at least provide minimal care for her sister. Enough to keep her alive.
Even in a really awful situation like this, I just do not understand how the toddler could get to that point - I just can't wrap my mind around it. Not too long ago, kids of 13 or 14 were paid to babysit younger children, toddlers, even babies. Unless there is something else going on here, behind the assertion that they "suspect she may have starved to death," it's heartbreaking to me that a 14-year-old should be so unprepared for an emergency situation.
Article Unavailable
1
doombird
I agree completely that we should really be minimizing the amount of synthetic and non-food chemicals we ingest -- and even the amount we expose ourselves to in cleaning and daily life. But I have to say, the argument that something is dangerous because it causes cancer in lab rats is at least a little misleading. I have a pair of pet rats and I read up on them, and these news articles give me a chuckle ever since.
EVERYTHING causes cancer in rats. They are notoriously sensitive and are often used to "prove" something is carcinogenic. Citrus fruit can give rats cancer -- honestly, that's one you can expect not to hear on the news headlines. "Orange juice found to cause cancer in lab rats! Are our children safe?" They have very different physiology from humans. Sure they're naturally scavengers who can eat anything, but that's why they only live about 2-3 years.
Posted in: Coke, Pepsi make changes to avoid cancer warning
0
doombird
It's good to see Japanese developing such a fondness for traditional Western foods!
Posted in: Try cooking a Big Mac in rice cooker
0
doombird
"women have more clothing issues than men and also seem to have less spatial awareness etc."
That's an interesting perspective to hear! It seems like every guy I've dated is constantly bumping into/stubbing his toes on things, getting food all over himself without being aware of it, plopping himself down in a seat that has stuff piled on it regardless of his own discomfort or what he might be damaging - or accidentally elbowing me or stepping on the backs of my heels when he's walking behind me. In my world, it's definitely more the women who have more awareness of small details like spatial positioning, although I've seen obliviousness on both sides.
Clothing issues, though, I will grant you for sure, and it's definitely not to women's credit. Personally, I revere the day that it was deemed acceptable for us to wear pants and normal shirts like the guys, and I take advantage of that privilege every day.
As far as holding the door open, if someone is enterting the same door and they're close enough behind me, I wait and hold it for them. And if they're carrying stuff or on crutches, I'll let them go in first, gender not considered. I just treat people like people.
Posted in: Do you think that a man giving up his seat on a bus or train to a woman, holding a door open for her or holding her chair as she sits down are outmoded?
0
doombird
Cleo, I'm not disputing that raising a child is an important and worthwhile job, but it can also be very demanding especially for a first-time mother, and just because you are the mom and dad is the dad doesn't mean it isn't inhumane to have to sit at home all day, every day with no one to talk to but an infant child. Few new parents have the extended family or social support they need, and mothers suffer especially because dads continue to be expected not to be as invested in the care of their children. It is emotionally and physically draining, and I don't see why it's such a horrible thing to expect dad to take some time off to actually bond with his child too - and give Mom a few hours or a day off here and there. I refuse to pretend that it's abnormal for a mother who absolutely loves her child, and even misses him/her when they have to be apart for any length of time, to still need some time to be her own person as well. Parental leave is designed to last for the first few months after a child is born, and I agree that someone should be home with the baby for at least the first year. But if daycare is undesirable, and one can't afford preschool - which on a single income is likely - then that means someone has to be home all the time with the kid until he's what, 5? And they're weaned by what, 2? I'm glad you didn't personally have any problems with sometimes feeling trapped or unable to get enough help, but what was your arrangement for those intervening years?
Posted in: Working toward gender equality in language and society
2
doombird
Not the best analogy. By and large, females also do the hunting. With dogs, once the pups are on their feet, mom is out of the den and everyone pulls equal weight. Birds are egalitarian, taking turns nest-sitting and setting out to find food for the chicks. With cats, all the males do is fight and copulate. Primate moms take sole care of their slower-to-mature, more needy young, but the males don't exactly bring home the bacon - they just look out for themselves. Male seahorses carry their young to term. Some fish will eat their own babies if they don't escape quickly enough, whether male or female.
So if we should emulate the animal kingdom, there are some serious mixed signals.
Posted in: Working toward gender equality in language and society
0
doombird
I'm not saying that all women should go out and wear shoulder pads and pound on conference room tables, either. I just want everyone to see and acknowledge that there is a divide between the ideas we have for people and what people may be capable of. Here in the US we're all about individual freedoms, often overly so. Yet even we are fantastically bad at raising children to their full potential as individuals without all these subtle gender stereotypes. I've seen several comments on here asking why it is that women naturally gravitate towards window-shopping or gaggling about with their girlfriends. It's because that's what they see women doing, because that's what those women saw. Because once, women weren't considered able to follow more serious pursuits, and generations of them were mentally and physically stunted by men who thought that their wives and daughters were weak and needed to be "kept" and "cared for." We generally consider all this to be unacceptable rubbish today, but yet there are still stereotypes that women are stupid or shallow and men are somehow less able to care or nurture and should avoid it. Even male nurses are prized for their strength, and not for their kindness or ability to give comfort to their patients.
So why shouldn't we scrape the slate clean, do our best to get rid of the gender stereotypes that are still kicking around (as "PC" as that may seem), and see what really lies underneath? Those people who decry any attempts, claiming that it's an attempt to erase gender entirely - what are they afraid of, really? The world isn't going to collapse if it doesn't work out. So is it that they way they were raised might be determined not to be the absolute best way? That's pretty shallow.
Posted in: Working toward gender equality in language and society
0
doombird
But again, this stance assumes that women have nothing more important to contribute to the whole of society than staying at home and cranking out babies. Some women want to be, say, doctors, and consider saving lives to be a more important calling than personally contributing to the population. We generally consider that OK today, for a minority of women, but still there's that society-wide stigma of "oh, but you're unfeminine for not wanting to have children" and then "oh, but if you have children you're shortchanging them by not giving up your job."
Women aren't that much more delicate than men by nature, you know. We're all animals and we all have muscular systems capable of improvement. If they're weak it's from being taught that it's cool for girls to hate gym class and whine at any physical activity and not pursue activities that challenge them, and from men being taught that it's masculine to do everything for women that requires any strength. I don't think that men who pursue careers as nurses are generally the strength-training musclehead crowd either - so is the difference so much that male nurses should be valued more? How often in nursing do you have to bench-press 200 pounds, or do more than lift, say, 50-pound equipment or roll someone over?
They make breast pumps for a reason. I've watched people fall into severe bouts of depression and do serious emotional harm to themselves from having to sit at home alone with their infant/toddler all day, every day while hubby gets to go to work and interact with actual adults and be a functioning member of society. It gets to the point where they NEED to get out and work, even if it's just a little, even if it means putting the kid in daycare or finding a babysitter, just so Mom can stay sane and connected with reality. It's not good for the mother nor the child, to be cooped up like that without any choice, just because "that's what women ought to do." That's why the equal-time parental leave that for example the Scandinavian countries offer is such a good idea - women might be doing good for society by raising their children well, but they also need a chance to be a functioning part of that society and develop physically and mentally. Otherwise you end up with hysterical, uneducated, bored women and men who are incapable of understanding or empathizing with their wives or their children. Which sounds like the last several hundred years of Western history.
Posted in: Working toward gender equality in language and society
0
doombird
@illsayit:
It seems like you're saying that even though women can have all the same jobs as men, a woman's career is somehow allowed to stop and start while a man's is not, regardless of how important her job is. Does that really make sense to you? Yes, I'm sure that after childbirth a woman needs some time off to physically heal (although I haven't done it myself yet), but after that, both parents are on pretty equal footing as far as caring for the kid. So it comes down to whose job more easily lets them take time off. In more progressive countries, both parents get a certain amount of time off by law, for them to divide up as they see fit. If you're implying that a woman's career is somehow disposable while a man's career can't afford the time off, simply because one is a woman and the other is a man, then you must assume that the woman should naturally be in a lower or less important career, which is totally at odds with what you said about women bosses being "understandable."
It's that kind of thinking that keeps women in lower positions. The argument that women and men have natural differences may be valid, but who defines what those differences are, and why should we apply them to everyone? If men are generally thought to be stronger and more aggressive, and women generally weaker and more nurturing, then you get teachers encouraging boys to be good at sports and pursue high-stakes careers, and encouraging girls to play with babies and care for the boys and not challenge themselves physically or mentally. And then when they grow up, people tell them they can be whatever they want, and of course they mostly do what they know. So people say a woman can be a boss or a president, but point to how few women are in those roles as proof that it's not as "natural" as having a man in the role. And the cycle begins again.
This is interesting. Nursing is traditionally a female-dominated position. What could male nurses handle better that makes them even more highly valued than women in that role? I wonder why it was a female-dominated profession to begin with, then?
Countries like Sweden aren't trying to eliminate gender, and they're certainly not trying to eliminate sex. It seems like what they're doing is trying to dust away all the old social constructs and stereotypes and give individuals a clean slate from the very beginning to decide themselves what they're capable of. I, for one, am all for it - if there are natural differences between the genders, I'd like to see what they are without any of the baggage of bygone societies weighing either side down. I bet the differences are less than we think they are, and that's not a bad thing.
Posted in: Working toward gender equality in language and society
3
doombird
Not to disparage his work, as I've never heard it, but I could only imagine that an anti-nuclear reggae artist would be complaining about rejection by mainstream media. I don't think that's unique to Japan at all. Songs about "heavy" topics might be more common on Top 40 stations in the US, but I think that political protest songs only really get any airtime if they are by bands that already have some celebrity status.
Posted in: Japanese prefer nonsense songs to message songs. It’s a hassle to think about the future, or about society. People want entertainment, not a message.
0
doombird
That's a cute knife! Still, while I agree that it is a mission, I'm a woman and cutting apart Japanese pumpkins never struck me as such a hardship that I'd go out and buy specialized equipment for it. That said, I'm sure there are lots of women who don't appreciate the extra elbow grease involved.
Posted in: Pumpkin knife
0
doombird
The thing that really blows my mind about all this is, when we talk about "reducing nuclear arsenals," what exactly are we doing with the weapons? Right now there are an estimated 9,400 active and reserve nuclear weapons in the US. Even if we "got rid of" all but 1,500, you don't just get rid of nuclear material. Sure, we can't blow each other to bits with it anymore, but it has to go somewhere. Are we just sticking it in the ground and pretending it doesn't exist anymore, like all our other garbage, or what?
Posted in: Obama: Al-Qaida would use nuclear weapons if it could
0
doombird
It doesn't look like they're even wearing any jewelry. Unless the point is that the women are just a pretty accessory to go with the dresses?
Article Unavailable
0
doombird
But it has a pen holder!!
Posted in: Post-it dispenser
0
doombird
Finally, people are getting away from those ubiquitous swimsuits that were bizarrely high cut, leaving hips and thighs hanging out for all to see and flattering no one. I like where this is going.
Still, all we can see here is that this newest swimsuit does work fantastically well on already-slim people.
Posted in: Fitness swimwear
0
doombird
I am guessing they grew up petting cows and hugging chickens in Harvest Moon games. How hard could farming be?
Posted in: City girls hit rice paddies, in style
0
doombird
Haha... wow, nice save there, Microsoft.
Posted in: Court bans sale of Word; Microsoft has fix ready
0
doombird
Every opinion you have, every belief and trait and mannerism that makes you who you are, is considered deeply offensive by someone somewhere. The question is, if we formed a consensus that it was not acceptable to say things that offended others, who would ultimately decide what is offensive? What would be left to say? The people who are most easily offended and who complain the loudest are always the ones to set the rules, and have everyone tiptoeing around them.
Posted in: Should freedom of expression include the right to offend others?
0
doombird
I'm guessing that this is mostly designed for those times when you're hunkered down alone in your (possibly kerosene-heated) room/cubicle for 12 hours straight doing work/schoolwork/playing games, and no one has to see you.
I'm constantly amazed at the clever little ways we come up with to make our unhealthy, antisocial behavior more comfortable, rather than having to try to minimize the need for it!
Posted in: For dry-eye syndrome