Stay in touch with the latest and widest range of Japan News with JapanToday's News Alert newsletter.
Up to the moment news in your inbox everyday. Subscribe now!
Already a JapanToday registered user?
Login to update your settings to subscribe to News Alert.
*Required
Moar tariff restrictions!
Knowing the US, they must weigh heavily on the issue!! (Sorry, couldn't help myself ;).)
Posted in: U.S. weighing steep nuclear arms cuts
Wurthington: "It makes me wonder. Are there Neighborhood Support Groups organized for families in Japan? As…
I wonder what the working conditions are like for Chinese owned manufacturing companies, designing their own…
paulinusa, collecting is not the same thing in my opinion. If you live in the boonies,…
Posted in: My favorite English bookstores in Tokyo
0
goodDonkey
At the very least the borders should be the 1967 borders. Really the borders should return to the UN Partition Plan of 1947.
Posted in: U.S. presents new proposal to Israel on reviving Mideast talks
0
goodDonkey
I expected this; no big surprise, at all.
Posted in: Black congressman announces bid for Chicago mayor
0
goodDonkey
TheRat is correct.
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
Obama is a great Commander in Chief.
Posted in: Obama salutes U.S. troops, condemns North Korea
0
goodDonkey
TimRussert
I guess you missed former Chairman Allen Greenspan say that tax cuts do not pay for themselves. Economists have had ample time to measure the effects of tax cuts on the U.S. economy - Bush puts the "bunk" back in Kennebunkport.
Posted in: Bush memoir sells 220,000 copies on first day
0
goodDonkey
mikehuntez at 09:27 AM JST - 10th November
It is not a case of being either one of the possibilities you propose or none at all. There are other possibilities. One possibility would be to let the prices be determined by fair market competition rather than by price fixing.
Posted in: EU fines airlines $1.1 billion for cargo cartel
0
goodDonkey
Alphaape
Who the hell did you think I was talking about?
Posted in: Muslim minister admits reluctant Michelle Obama handshake
0
goodDonkey
TimRussert at 08:44 AM JST - 10th November
`
And what pray tell does one have to do with the other. He could be both the best author that ever lived and the worst president ever. What evidence do you have that the two things are mutually exclusive?
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
mikehuntez
Hilarious; how you managed to bring up "liberal bleeding hearts" in this thread.
Those ultraconservatives are really whack!
Posted in: Muslim minister admits reluctant Michelle Obama handshake
0
goodDonkey
Finally, a thread where the Bush truthtellers can tell the truth to their heart's content!
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
Another thing Tigermoth
I am not a prude and I don't drink. I have plenty of alcohol available in my home to those that do drink.
Bush was also snorting mountains of cocaine. But he would never state that something should be done concerning the disparity in the law concerning recreational drugs. (I don't do drugs either)
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
Currently Bush holds the title for WPE. Two events will keep him there for a very long time. The war in Iraq and its justification will always be judged harshly as history continues to divulge the true cost of the war. The Great Recession will eventually be placed squarely on Bush's shoulders when history is finally sorted out. All of Obama's efforts will be vindicated concerning the Great Recession.
Bush's bailout of financial institutions will also be seen differently through the eyes of historians. It will be seen as a redeeming factor; a factor when combined with Obama's effort to save the financial and banking industries turned a looming depression into the Great Recession. Just like history records, the events leading up to the 1929 crash, were the cause of a decade of depression, so will the prior administration's (i.e. Bush) be historically what continued the Great Recession so deep into the Obama administration. These idiots that claim we want to "blame it on Bush" and claim it is unwarranted would have been blaming Roosevelt for the Great Depression. History will render out the truth. The truth is that Bush's mistakes and inaction really did last this long and maybe longer. Economist already agree that the stimulus did work and should have been larger or followed by another stimulus bill.
Squandered resources will be Bush's legacy. Squandered budget surplus. Squandered goodwill of the world after 9/11. Squandered military resources.
I do not feel any ill feeling and have absolutely no ill will towards him. I actually feel sorry for him. Here was this, not so bright individual, who was thrust into the presidency by the forces around him. He did the best he could. Unfortunately it was crap. The social conservatives will still sing his praises - as demonstrated on this JT thread.
The best post presidential legacy he can attain would be to be quiet.
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
Derision Points
Posted in: Bush is back, and eager to help history judge him
0
goodDonkey
TimRussert
Yeah like a 20% tax is robbing the super rich. Most people pay a much higher rate. Factor in social security and it is no contest on who is paying the highest tax rate.
TimRussert, MisterCreosote or RomeoRamenII or for that matter what ever else he/she decide to call their self thinks the 100 millionaires and billionaires should only be paying 15% in taxes.
Posted in: Obama says 'midcourse corrections' to come at home
0
goodDonkey
lol @ motogaijin
Posted in: Republicans in charge take aim at health overhaul
0
goodDonkey
I have heard that the Republicans will be trying to repeal over and over again. That is playing politics instead of governing. I do think that getting insurance across state lines would also be helpful. But nooooooooooo they will want total repeal or nothing.
Posted in: Republicans in charge take aim at health overhaul
0
goodDonkey
I can see extending the tax cuts to most of the tax brackets. Why should we extend them to the super rich? Someone please answer that? It is certainly not for economic reasons. They will spend at the same lever regardless of their tax rate. I am for splitting the capital gains tax into a more progressive structure. Instead of 20% (2011) for almost everyone I would like to see 15% for the middle class incomes and 25% for the wealthiest, who are now paying some of the lowest tax rates. Currently the wealthy are paying 15% (on long term gains) and that number will increase to 20%, like I said in 2011. Most people who are not rich rely on money that is income taxed by the IRS at a higher rate than the capital gains taxes that the rich primarily pay. There should be an upward break, in capital gain taxes, somewhere past $250k. It may only be just a couple of percent and then another few percent at 1/2 a mil and another few percent at 1 mil.
But the Republicans want to have the rich and super rich pay only 15% taxes on the vast majority of their new money coming in every year. I must admit that I am not big on a 39.6% tax rate for the top income tax rate, even for the CEO making 3 - 10 mil a year. That is the rate come 2011 for those $373,651 and above. I also think that threshold should be a lot higher.
Well this is one thing they will be arguing when they want to restore some or all of the tax cuts. Again the Republicans will be arguing to make the vast majority of the super rich's taxes a mere 15%. Otherwise they will rise to 20%. 20% for a billionaire is too high for the Republicans they want it to be 15%.
Posted in: Obama says 'midcourse corrections' to come at home
0
goodDonkey
If the Republicans would want to take a look at paper work reduction for the health care bill I would commend them. However, they want to repeal the whole ball of wax or nothing at all. That's not governing that is playing politics. Of course the conservatives have been getting away with playing politics for a long time now. So why should they quit? Certainly not for the good of the country.
Posted in: Republicans in charge take aim at health overhaul
0
goodDonkey
Such malevolent deeds by the time he was 20.
Posted in: Nazi war criminal Seifert dead at 86 in Italy
0
goodDonkey
The Nobel prize has been around a lot longer than the People's Republic of China.
Posted in: Beijing denounces Nobel prize as a Western tool