« Back To Top

kwatt said...

  • kwatt at 09:55 AM JST - 23rd October

    The US really wants to continue to keep present large US bases in Okinawa whatever happens, even if US and Japan disagreed finally about Futenma base relocation. It seems that the US wants to keep them there even if without large amount of money support from J government, or they…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 09:55 AM JST - 23rd October

  • kwatt at 06:13 PM JST - 22nd October

    In China Windows7 has been sold since last month. Of course, copies with cheapest price.

    Posted in Windows 7 goes on sale in Japan at 06:13 PM JST - 22nd October

  • kwatt at 05:56 PM JST - 22nd October

    david1-5 - Your message is very understandable. Japan seems to have more benefit while US bases keep staying but not much benefit or advantage for the US. In spite of it, Why does the US want to put large US bases in Japan? The US seems to be wasting a…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 05:56 PM JST - 22nd October

  • kwatt at 05:34 PM JST - 22nd October

    Not enough for hub airport. J government does not have political power to kick farmers out of there and maybe could have made more longer runways there as hub airport long time ago if used force.

    Posted in Narita's extended 2nd runway goes into operation at 05:34 PM JST - 22nd October

  • kwatt at 09:36 AM JST - 22nd October

    I think that China and other Asian countries would like US bases to keep in Japan but not too many, not too heavy, as there are too many US bases all over in Japan, especially too heavy concentration in Okinawa. Why the US wants them in Japan? Ready for another…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 09:36 AM JST - 22nd October

  • kwatt at 09:04 AM JST - 22nd October

    smithinJapan - As far as I know, Japan did not ask the US to keep the long range nukes in America soil. The US wanted to keep them for yourselves for potential future war. In the first place NKrea would not make war against Japan. If NK wanted so, it…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 09:04 AM JST - 22nd October

  • kwatt at 11:46 PM JST - 21st October

    You guys love talking about potential nukes war. No countries can afford to make war. It costs a lot more than you imagine. All countries are now connected each other with global economy. if one country attacks another, then it will receive big economic influence. No countries will use nukes…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 11:46 PM JST - 21st October

  • kwatt at 10:37 PM JST - 21st October

    ptolemy - Yes, Afghanistan is very far away from Japan, but I've heard US soldiers flew (or flying) to Afghanistan from Okinawa US bases. If so, the US seems to be using Japan for potential act of war. During 10 years Vietnam's war, the US used Okinawa US bases like…

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 10:37 PM JST - 21st October

  • kwatt at 10:09 PM JST - 21st October

    ptolemy - I just wonder why Americans are going dying for Afghanistan. so far more than 4000 US soldiers died. Is there any peace treaty between US and Afghanistan? If not, why are Americans dying there? Afghanistan rather might send terrorists to the US.

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 10:09 PM JST - 21st October

  • kwatt at 09:33 PM JST - 21st October

    noborito - Yes, Japan really welcomes almost everything but except military things, nuclear weapons, etc, etc. I think Japanese still remember tragedy of the war. And Big thanks for article #9 given by the US.

    Posted in No Futenma relocation, no transfer of Marines to Guam, Gates says at 09:33 PM JST - 21st October

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...71