Bogi > people are bashing us for making quick changes, and bashing us for not making changes at all. Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems - we're going to roll out changes as diplomatically as possible now by taking all your thoughts into consideration and figuring…
that's not HTML, Dan. You've attempted to use BB code by the looks of it and these comments don't support that. Just plain text for now until we put formatting options back in (new and improved, of course)! Thanks for your understanding and positive comment above.
I think a clear distinction between links and regular text can only be good for the usability of a site. Make the links too dark and you risk confusing what is clickable and what is not, which I feel would be a problem for new members of the old site…
NagoyaOya > I don't want to give away too many details, but development on this new site started in February (a little over a month ago). Now that we have essentially completely rewritten the software, JT is now free to move a lot quicker in terms of functionality upgrades. And…
taj > I assure you we are reading every post in this thread and we are currently incrementally adding stuff that we agree with. As always, constructive criticism is appreciated.
yongfook at 11:31 PM JST - 25th March
"yongfook" isn't meant to offend. FYI, it's my real name, and surprise surprise, it's not English.
Cheers.
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 11:31 PM JST - 25th March
yongfook at 05:01 PM JST - 25th March
Bogi > people are bashing us for making quick changes, and bashing us for not making changes at all. Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems - we're going to roll out changes as diplomatically as possible now by taking all your thoughts into consideration and figuring…
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 05:01 PM JST - 25th March
yongfook at 12:57 PM JST - 25th March
Bogi > my temperature widget says 13 degrees, so I think we're all wrong ;)
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 12:57 PM JST - 25th March
yongfook at 10:37 PM JST - 24th March
ah ok I know what you mean. we'll fix that.
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 10:37 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 10:29 PM JST - 24th March
that's not HTML, Dan. You've attempted to use BB code by the looks of it and these comments don't support that. Just plain text for now until we put formatting options back in (new and improved, of course)! Thanks for your understanding and positive comment above.
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 10:29 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 10:19 PM JST - 24th March
I think a clear distinction between links and regular text can only be good for the usability of a site. Make the links too dark and you risk confusing what is clickable and what is not, which I feel would be a problem for new members of the old site…
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 10:19 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 07:16 PM JST - 24th March
didn't feel this one at all.
Posted in M5.3 quake hits areas north of Tokyo at 07:16 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 06:40 PM JST - 24th March
NagoyaOya > I don't want to give away too many details, but development on this new site started in February (a little over a month ago). Now that we have essentially completely rewritten the software, JT is now free to move a lot quicker in terms of functionality upgrades. And…
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 06:40 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 04:56 PM JST - 24th March
Dan > thanks for the heads up. we have it covered, though ;)
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 04:56 PM JST - 24th March
yongfook at 04:03 PM JST - 24th March
taj > I assure you we are reading every post in this thread and we are currently incrementally adding stuff that we agree with. As always, constructive criticism is appreciated.
Posted in What do you think of the new Japan Today design? at 04:03 PM JST - 24th March