national

IAEA begins inspection of nuclear power plant in Fukui

28 Comments
By Mari Yamaguchi

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

28 Comments
Login to comment

IAEA begins inspection of nuclear power plant in Fukui

That's good. But what about Fukushima? Don't tell me "The Fukushima Daiichi plants are cold shut down condition and essentially stable." just like PM Noda said at the press conference the other day.

1 ( +1 / -1 )

Start them up. We need the electric.

-5 ( +4 / -9 )

I bet none of the plants in Japan wanted an IAEA inspection. They probably drew lots, with poor old Ohi drawing the short straw.

Everyone else meanwhile quickly shut down for 'regular' inspections or simulated 'stress' tests.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The nuclear village inspects the nuclear village.

The outcome is obvious...

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Nuclear energy is always dangerous. It's a lost gamble. It is not worthy since there will always be accidents.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

TEPCO might have given draft (in japanese) to IAEA, -ijo nashi, shimpai nashi hai ryokai (nothing wrong, nothing to worry and it's alright) !!!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"Before you enter the complex, please kindly put on these blindfolds"

1 ( +1 / -0 )

The estimate also played down the supply capacity of pumped-storage hydroelectricity, which utilizes night-time surplus power during the daytime.

I think pumped-storage hydroelectricity should be added to the total amount of electricity that they can supply; TEPCO can supply 6,810,000kw by pumped-hydro, but it seems to be always controversial issue...

0 ( +1 / -1 )

"suggesting that the government would override possible local opposition if Japan’s energy needs were dire."

The only dire needs in this regard are those of the gangs of irresponsible liars that profit substantially from building, operating, and cheerleading for nuclear power.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Capitalism has its advantages and disadvantages. Start up the reactors.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Nuclear Power is NOT safe, German Gov’t Study: Children living near nuclear plants have double leukemia rates, high incidence of solid cancers. Reactors cannot prevent radiation from escaping.

The people, Children and Adults in some areas of Fukushima are suffering horribly from Radiation exposure. It's not pretty and it should not be even considered okay to start up any reactors while knowing whats coming out of them. It is damaging to the population who lives in close proximity to these reactors. None of them are safe.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Zichi I wholeheartedly agree with you on this. The food is poisoned with radiation and so are the people when they live near nuclear power plants.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Hang on... they just went there and 'exchanged views' (ie. paid lip-service to one another) before the IAEA simply watched them plug the thing in and push the start button? Doesn't sound like all that thorough an inspection.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

No matter what Japan does, the plants need to be brought back online. The old ones can be shut down but closing them all is insanity. There is no way to prove absolute safety. Without enough electric, might as well complete the deindustrialization of Japan. Japan can be a 3rd world country again.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

@ YuriOtani

Japan has 22 steam-electric plants - coal and lignite, 14 Gas- and Oil-Fired Steam-Electric Plants, 25 combined-cycle and gas turbine plants - CCGT, 32 conventional hydroelectric plants, 9 pumped-storage hydroelectric plants, 18 nuclear power plants, 7 waste-to-energy plants.

You can still turn on your lights without the NPP's.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Ultrack, as long as Japan can get fuel for them. Really the plants should be looked at and those that can be restarted. My suggestion is any town that does not want the nuke restarted be placed on a list. Not only should they be charged more but the first to lose their power in a shortage. Really until there is a proper replacement they have to be used. Destroying the economy of Japan for paranoia is baka.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

7 waste-to-energy plants fuel is Refuse ; 32 conventional hydroelectric plants just needs moving water to generate electricity ; 9 pumped-storage hydroelectric plants just needs moving water to generate electricity

That's 49 power plants that don't need fuel at all and that's10 plants shy of being half of the non nuclear power plants in Japan. How is it paranoia when scientists and experts have revealed their research that reactors can't keep radiation from escaping and that children living near nuclear plants are prone to getting cancer. I wish is was paranoia and not a fact.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Utrack, there is no such thing as a lack of radiation. They are using statistics and not hard facts. The lack of radiation is a fact, do you know how much radiation is produced by a 1 megaton bomb ground burst?Japan does not have the luxury of not running them. Remember pollution kills people as well.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Perhaps economists should look more closely at Japan's so-called economic miracle, supported by billions of yen of anonymous donations (aka bribes) to politicians, academics, bureaucrats, the media, local unions and government, run off the faulty premise that nuclear power was cheap and safe.

The hollow economies that have grown around these NPPs, funded by cheap, dirty money, are not sustainable; and the expensive sports and culture facilities to placate the locals - in reality hardly used, subsidised quasi-tourism, and and extensive, one-time construction works have done nothing to stimulate real business or other industries, and have destroyed traditional local industries such as fishing and handicrafts. With the NPPs going or gone, there is nothing left for the locals now the subsidies are drying up.

Even the national power grid, designed to feed power from these rural backwaters to the industrial complexes and mega-cities of Japan's pacific coast, failed abysmally.

Time is running out, this business model is not going to last much longer.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

People have been scared STUPID by this accident. Suppose it has to do with the evil radiation. People buying radiation detectors looking for it in their food and homes. How many people have been killed by the radiation? Then compare it to people dying from respiratory illness, traffic accidents and suicide. While it is sad people get killed or sick, why don't we pay more attention to the other deaths? The government and nuclear industry need to learn from this accident and prevent it was happening again. The scientists need to study low levels of radiation and what are the effects on the human body. My knowledge of this is from a military perspective. If I remember right people start getting sick at 50 rems, start dying at 200 rems and almost 100 percent by 1000 rems. If I understand it there is .1 Millisievert per rem. So by cold war standards it would take 500 of them in a short period of time to start showing illness.

I do agree the nuclear industry needs to be better regulated. Until we can replace the plants they need to stay online. Oil, gas and coal kill people as well. Next time you fly out of Handea on a "clear" day, take a look towards the ground and you will see a brown blanket of pollution covering the Kanto area. You are breathing that and it is TOXIC. Though most people do not worry about that. The press has scared people STUPID and if studied more people died in the evacuation than the threat. My question is what is the actual threat?

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

YuriOtani, cold war standards are precisely the problem. Nuclear power is an antiquated Cold War artifact. It's grossly inefficient and consumes huge subsidies to produce electricity. Cold war standards are not accurate. There are almost no data on the consequences of low level exposure that are not either based on extremely flawed Hiroshima/Nagasaki exposure rubrics and/or collected by people with an interest in keeping nuclear power going. Japan is doing fine with only 3 reactors in the midst of peak winter usage. No blackouts. No brownouts. No problems. The government's projections of shortfalls last summer were completely inaccurate. Japan has enough power without nuclear. Oil and fossil fuels are fungible. If you can't buy it from somebody, say Iran, Iran will sell it to somebody you can buy it from. Japan has enough intelligence to achieve greater energy efficiency and much more effective renewable sources. Japan could easily lead the world into a new era of much cleaner energy if it were not ruled by a gang of people wedded to the Cold War past. In fact, the huge cost of nuclear power that TEPCO intends to pass on to consumers by increasing rates is driving Japanese business to send their manufacturing capacity abroad. Continuing to live in the past is the path to the destruction of Japan's industrial power.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites