The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2012 AFPSamsung injunctions against Apple breach rules: EU
BRUSSELS©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2012 AFP
7 Comments
Login to comment
semperfi
Finally a court that has the balz ti call it as it is .
wtfjapan
Apple & Samsung have too step back and get the acts together, neither company will destroy the other. they both need to make better phones at reduced prices and let the customers decide whos best
basroil
As mentioned dozens of times before, the reason Samsung was seeking an injunction was because Apple was not in the category of "willing licensees". Apple first argued that the patents were not used, then that they would only pay pennies for it, even though their entire ecosystem depends on it. And in the mean time Apple offered their patents in exchange for $40 per device AND free access to the 3g licenses. Hardly willing there, and given their reluctance to make their patents available to anyone (at least those ones), the 3g licenses must be worth quite a bit.
smithinjapan
Looks like Samsung was a little too hell-bent on revenge for the sake of revenge instead of looking up the actual laws. Ouch!
Crazedinjapan
Screw Samsung ! Nothing impresses me about them. Pure Asian greed shown again ....
technosphere
Whatever you say :-)
basroil
smithinjapanDec. 22, 2012 - 11:44PM JST
You do realize that the laws say nothing about it, and only the commission said something? The laws actually specifically allow injunctions in the case of a party unwilling to license, which Apple clearly was by giving Samsung counter offers that were downright rude.